The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations
Open accessAbstract
Stimulus-evoked neural activity is attenuated on stimulus repetition (repetition suppression), a phenomenon that is attributed to largely automatic processes in sensory neurons. By manipulating the likelihood of stimulus repetition, we found that repetition suppression in the human brain was reduced when stimulus repetitions were improbable (and thus, unexpected). Our data suggest that repetition suppression reflects a relative reduction in top-down perceptual 'prediction error' when processing an expected, compared with an unexpected, stimulus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This phenomenon, termed 'expectation suppression' [64,68,71], is present even when low-level adaptation is controlled for and has been consistently found across modalities such as vision [65][66][67][72][73][74] and audition [68,69,75,76].”
From How Do Expectations Shape Perception? (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“All over cortex, there is less spiking and smaller blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses when a stimulus is repeated (4–9).”
From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“An influential early study by Summerfield et al. 57 sought to control for the effects of adaptation by comparing blood oxygen level—dependent (BOLD) activity in the fusiform face area (FFA) of human participants in response to stimulus repetitions that were expected versus unexpected, and found that expected repetitions yielded substantially smaller BOLD responses.”
From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
A theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
A free energy principle for the brain
Friston, K., Kilner, J., & Harrison, L. (2006) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.10.001 · Cited by 1,369
Object perception as Bayesian inference
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005 · Cited by 1,269
fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons
Kalanit Grill-spector, A., & Malach, R. (2001) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00019-1 · Cited by 1,089
Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention
Desimone, R. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13494 · Cited by 1,028
Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex
Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1061133 · Cited by 915
Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming
Wiggs, C. L., & Martin, A. D. (1998) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80144-x · Cited by 871
Neuroimaging studies of priming
Henson, R. N. (2003) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(03)00086-8 · Cited by 770
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Summerfield, C. & Koechlin, E. Neuron published online, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.21 (2008). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding
Bastos, A. M., Usrey, W. M., Adams, R. A., Mangun, G. R., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.038 · Cited by 2,421
“The inhibitory effect of feedback connections is further supported by neuroimaging studies (Murray et al., 2002, 2006; Harrison et al., 2007; Summerfield et al., 2008, 2011; Alink et al., 2010).”
Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self
Seth, A. K. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007 · Cited by 1,816
How Do Expectations Shape Perception?
de Lange, F. P., Heilbron, M., & Kok, P. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.002 · Cited by 975
Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003 · Cited by 950
Self-citationAn Interoceptive Predictive Coding Model of Conscious Presence
Seth, A. K., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00395 · Cited by 950
“Their key finding is that repetition suppression can be abolished when the local likelihood of repetitions is manipulated so that repetitions become unexpected (Egner et al., 2008).”
BackgroundExpectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms
Summerfield, C., & de Lange, F. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3838 · Cited by 832
Self-citationPrecise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism.
Van de Cruys, S., Evers, K., Van der Hallen, R., Van Eylen, L., Boets, B., de-Wit, L., & Wagemans, J. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037665 · Cited by 885
Predictions not commands: Active inference in the motor system
Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5 · Cited by 765
Less Is More: Expectation Sharpens Representations in the Primary Visual Cortex
Kok, P., Jehee, J. F. M., & de Lange, F. P. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.034 · Cited by 798
An aberrant precision account of autism
Lawson, R. P., Rees, G., & Friston, K. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00302 · Cited by 641
Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex
Wacongne, C., Labyt, E., van Wassenhove, V., Bekinschtein, T., Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1117807108 · Cited by 560
Dehaene, S., Meyniel, F., Wacongne, C., Wang, L., & Pallier, C. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.019 · Cited by 478
Theory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem
Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.020 · Cited by 513
Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study
Todorovic, A., van Ede, F., Maris, E., & de Lange, F. P. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1425-11.2011 · Cited by 391
Attention and conscious perception in the hypothesis testing brain
Hohwy, J. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00096 · Cited by 396
Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks
Kristjansson, A. K., & Campana, G. (2009) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.1.5 · Cited by 422
Theories of Error Back-Propagation in the Brain
Whittington, J. C. R., & Bogacz, R. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.005 · Cited by 420
Hughes, G., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028566 · Cited by 365
Expectation and Surprise Determine Neural Population Responses in the Ventral Visual Stream
Egner, T., Monti, J. M., & Summerfield, C. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2770-10.2010 · Cited by 350
Self-citationTemporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory.
Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000045 · Cited by 416
Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception
Walsh, K. S., McGovern, D. P., Clark, A., & O'Connell, R. G. (2020) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14321 · Cited by 333
Todorovic, A., & de Lange, F. P. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2227-12.2012 · Cited by 326
Implicit Perceptual Anticipation Triggered by Statistical Learning
Turk‐Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Johnson, M. K., & Chun, M. M. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0858-10.2010 · Cited by 384
Repetition suppression and its contextual determinants in predictive coding
Auksztulewicz, R., & Friston, K. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.024 · Cited by 307
Seth, A. K. (2014) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2013.877880 · Cited by 346
Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates
Kok, P., Mostert, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705652114 · Cited by 340
Bayesian approaches to autism: Towards volatility, action, and behavior.
Palmer, C. J., Lawson, R. P., & Hohwy, J. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000097 · Cited by 307
Emotion words shape emotion percepts.
Gendron, M., Lindquist, K. A., Barsalou, L. W., & Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0026007 · Cited by 357
Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing
Bastos, A. M., Lundqvist, M., Waite, A. S., Kopell, N., & Miller, E. K. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2014868117 · Cited by 268
“, 2018; Schwiedrzik and Freiwald, 2017; Zmarz and Keller, 2016) and higher fMRI BOLD signals (Alink et al., 2010; Kok et al., 2012; Summerfield et al., 2008)”
Striatal Prediction Error Modulates Cortical Coupling
den Ouden, H. E. M., Daunizeau, J., Roiser, J., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4458-09.2010 · Cited by 304
Putting Reward in Art: A Tentative Prediction Error Account of Visual Art
de Cruys, S. V., & Wagemans, J. P. (2011) · i-Perception · doi:10.1068/i0466aap · Cited by 311
Prior Expectations Evoke Stimulus Templates in the Primary Visual Cortex
Kok, P., Failing, M. F., & de Lange, F. P. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00562 · Cited by 293
fMRI Repetition Suppression: Neuronal Adaptation or Stimulus Expectation?
Larsson, J., & Smith, A. T. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr119 · Cited by 264
Prior expectations bias sensory representations in visual cortex
Kok, P., Brouwer, G. J., van Gerven, M. A. J., & de Lange, F. P. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0742-13.2013 · Cited by 260
Online evaluation of novel choices by simultaneous representation of multiple memories
Barron, H. C., Dolan, R. J., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3515 · Cited by 280
Whittington, J. C. R., & Bogacz, R. (2017) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00949 · Cited by 278
The Functional Neuroanatomy of Human Face Perception
Kalanit Grill-spector, A., Weiner, K. S., Kay, K., & Gomez, J. (2017) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061214 · Cited by 290
Carbajal, G. V., & Malmierca, M. S. (2018) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216518784822 · Cited by 241
Melloni, L., Schwiedrzik, C. M., Müller, N. G., Rodríguez, E., & Singer, W. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4570-10.2011 · Cited by 240
Xu, M., Xiao, X., Wang, Y., Qi, H., Jung, T., & Ming, D. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2018.2799661 · Cited by 228
Gotts, S. J., Chow, C. C., & Martin, A. (2012) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2012.670617 · Cited by 213
Repetition suppression: a means to index neural representations using BOLD?
Barron, H. C., Garvert, M. M., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0355 · Cited by 229
Counterfactual Choice and Learning in a Neural Network Centered on Human Lateral Frontopolar Cortex
Boorman, E. D., Behrens, T. E. J., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001093 · Cited by 237
Top-down effects on early visual processing in humans: A predictive coding framework
Rauss, K., Schwartz, S., & Pourtois, G. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.011 · Cited by 219
Relief as a reward: hedonic and neural responses to safety from pain
Leknes, S., Lee, M., Berna, C., Andersson, J., & Tracey, I. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017870 · Cited by 207
Distances between real-world locations are represented in the human hippocampus
Morgan, L. K., MacEvoy, S. P., Aguirre, G. K., & Epstein, R. A. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4667-10.2011 · Cited by 203
The suppression of repetition enhancement: A review of fMRI studies
Segaert, K., Weber, K., de Lange, F. P., Petersson, K. M., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.006 · Cited by 208
Learning what to expect (in visual perception)
Seriès, P., & Seitz, A. R. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00668 · Cited by 194
Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation
Noonan, M. P., Adamian, N., Pike, A. C., Printzlau, F. A. B., Crittenden, B. M., & Stokes, M. G. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2133-15.2016 · Cited by 211
Shape Perception Simultaneously Up- and Downregulates Neural Activity in the Primary Visual Cortex
Kok, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.042 · Cited by 163
Serial Dependence in Perceptual Decisions Is Reflected in Activity Patterns in Primary Visual Cortex
John-Saaltink, E. S., Kok, P., Lau, H. C., & de Lange, F. P. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4390-15.2016 · Cited by 195
Functional dissociation of stimulus intensity encoding and predictive coding of pain in the insula
Geuter, S., Boll, S., Eippert, F., & Büchel, C. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.24770 · Cited by 184
Adaptive Gain Control during Human Perceptual Choice
Cheadle, S. W., Wyart, V., Tsetsos, K., Myers, N. E., de Gardelle, V., Castañón, S. H., & Summerfield, C. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.020 · Cited by 194
Self-citationReal and Fictive Outcomes Are Processed Differently but Converge on a Common Adaptive Mechanism
Fischer, A. G., & Ullsperger, M. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.006 · Cited by 187
Forms of prediction in the nervous system
Teufel, C., & Fletcher, P. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0275-5 · Cited by 155
Representation, inference, and transcendent encoding in neurocognitive networks of the human brain
Mesulam, M. M. (2008) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21534 · Cited by 166
Self-citationHuman Scalp Electroencephalography Reveals that Repetition Suppression Varies with Expectation
Summerfield, C., Wyart, V., Johnen, V. M., & de Gardelle, V. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00067 · Cited by 145
Self-citationBastos, A. M., Litvak, V., Moran, R., Bosman, C. A., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.081 · Cited by 152
Gentsch, A., & Schütz‐Bosbach, S. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00012 · Cited by 166
Different Spatial Scales of Shape Similarity Representation in Lateral and Ventral LOC
Drucker, P. D. D. M., & Aguirre, G. K. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn244 · Cited by 150
Attention Sharpens the Distinction between Expected and Unexpected Percepts in the Visual Brain
Jiang, J., Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3308-13.2013 · Cited by 133
Self-citationGoals and strategies influence lexical prediction during sentence comprehension
Brothers, T. A., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.002 · Cited by 170
Viewpoint (In)dependence of Action Representations: An MVPA Study
Oosterhof, N. N., Tipper, S. P., & Downing, P. E. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00195 · Cited by 156
Kaliukhovich, D. A., & Vogels, R. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq207 · Cited by 131
Emberson, L. L., Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.538972 · Cited by 142
Dysfunction of Rapid Neural Adaptation in Dyslexia
Perrachione, T. K., Tufo, S. N. D., Winter, R. E., Murtagh, J., Cyr, A. B., Chang, P., Halverson, K. K., Ghosh, S., Christodoulou, J. A., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.020 · Cited by 153
Human Inferences about Sequences: A Minimal Transition Probability Model
Meyniel, F., Maheu, M., & Dehaene, S. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005260 · Cited by 145
Chen, J., Olsen, R. K., Preston, A. R., Glover, G. H., & Wagner, A. D. (2011) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.2135211 · Cited by 141
Tuning to non‐symbolic proportions in the human frontoparietal cortex
Jacob, S. N., & Nieder, A. (2009) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06932.x · Cited by 139
Kremláček, J., Kreegipuu, K., Tales, A., Astikainen, P., Põldver, N., Näätänen, R., & Stefanics, G. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.017 · Cited by 148
Weiner, K. S., Sayres, R., Vinberg, J., & Kalanit Grill-spector, A. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01108.2009 · Cited by 138
Prior expectations evoke stimulus-specific activity in the deep layers of the primary visual cortex
Aitken, F., Menelaou, G., Warrington, O., Koolschijn, R. S., Corbin, N., Callaghan, M. F., & Kok, P. (2020) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001023 · Cited by 141
Vance, A., Jenkins, J. L., Anderson, B. B., Bjornn, D. K., & Kirwan, C. B. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/14124 · Cited by 137
Measuring neural representations with fMRI: practices and pitfalls
Davis, T., & Poldrack, R. A. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12156 · Cited by 132
Abstract Representations of Location and Facing Direction in the Human Brain
Vass, L. K., & Epstein, R. A. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3873-12.2013 · Cited by 131
Unmasking Latent Inhibitory Connections in Human Cortex to Reveal Dormant Cortical Memories
Barron, H. C., Vogels, T. P., Emir, U. E., Makin, T. R., O’Shea, J., Clare, S., Jbabdi, S., Dolan, R. J., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.031 · Cited by 133
Baene, W. D., & Vogels, R. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp277 · Cited by 132
Can predictive coding explain repetition suppression?
Grotheer, M., & Kovács, G. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.027 · Cited by 108
Encoding of event timing in the phase of neural oscillations
Kösem, A., Gramfort, A., & van Wassenhove, V. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.010 · Cited by 133
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Bell, A. H., Summerfield, C., Morin, E. L., Malecek, N. J., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.007 · Cited by 118
Self-citationPredictive coding of phonological rules in auditory cortex: A mismatch negativity study
Ylinen, S., Huuskonen, M., Mikkola, K., Saure, E., Sinkkonen, T., & Paavilainen, P. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.007 · Cited by 119
Ward, J. (2018) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2018.1557131 · Cited by 134
Boorman, E. D., Rajendran, V. G., O’Reilly, J. X., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.014 · Cited by 116
Perceptual illusions in brief visual presentations
de Gardelle, V., Sackur, J., & Kouider, S. (2009) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.03.002 · Cited by 116
Associative Prediction of Visual Shape in the Hippocampus
Kok, P., & Turk‐Browne, N. B. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0163-18.2018 · Cited by 121
Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning
Chandrasekaran, B., Kraus, N., & Wong, P. C. M. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00923.2011 · Cited by 111
Sources of adaptation of inferior temporal cortical responses
Vogels, R. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.024 · Cited by 97
Fazeli, S., & Büchel, C. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0671-18.2018 · Cited by 105
Schmitz, T. W., Cheng, F. H. T., & Rosa, E. D. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2687-10.2010 · Cited by 113
Hemodynamic Correlates of Cognition in Human Infants
Aslin, R. Ν., Shukla, M., & Emberson, L. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115108 · Cited by 103
Monaco, S., Cavina-Pratesi, C., Sedda, A., Fattori, P., Galletti, C., & Culham, J. C. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01069.2010 · Cited by 104
Time Adaptation Shows Duration Selectivity in the Human Parietal Cortex
Hayashi, M. J., Ditye, T., Harada, T., Hashiguchi, M., Sadato, N., Carlson, S., Walsh, V., & Kanai, R. (2015) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002262 · Cited by 104
The Hippocampus and Neocortical Inhibitory Engrams Protect against Memory Interference
Koolschijn, R. S., Emir, U. E., Pantelides, A. C., Nili, H., Behrens, T. E. J., & Barron, H. C. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.042 · Cited by 105
Is predictive coding theory articulated enough to be testable?
Kogo, N., & Trengove, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2015.00111 · Cited by 98
“…question is particularly crucial because it has been suggested that reduction of neural signals at the lower level can be explained in terms of error minimization (Murray et al., 2002; Summerfield et al., 2008; den Ouden et al., 2009; Alink et al., 2010; Todorovic et al., 2011; Kok et al., 2012b).”
BackgroundRossion, B., Retter, T. L., & Liu‐Shuang, J. (2020) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14865 · Cited by 113
Brain signatures of a multiscale process of sequence learning in humans
Maheu, M., Dehaene, S., & Meyniel, F. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41541 · Cited by 103
Tang, M. F., Smout, C. A., Arabzadeh, E., & Mattingley, J. B. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.33123 · Cited by 83
Lumaca, M., Haumann, N. T., Brattico, E., Grube, M., & Vuust, P. (2018) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14329 · Cited by 100
Statistical learning attenuates visual activity only for attended stimuli
Richter, D., & de Lange, F. P. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47869 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Summerfield, C., Trittschuh, E. H., Monti, J. M., Mesulam, M.-M., & Egner, T.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Egner, Tobias
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1004-1006
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC2747248
- OpenAlex
- W1966342514
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS30863, R01NS030863)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025741)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- stimulus predictability, top-down processing, prediction error, perceptual expectations, stimulus repetition, sensory processing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Repression, Psychology, Time Factors, Likelihood Functions, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
