Cited by 131Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsVestibular and auditory disorders

Abstract Representations of Location and Facing Direction in the Human Brain

Open access
Vass, Lindsay K., Epstein, Russell A.·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Humans, like other mobile organisms, rely on spatial representations to guide navigation from place to place. Although previous work has identified neural systems involved in wayfinding, the specific spatial codes supported by these systems are not well understood. We use functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify regions within the human medial temporal and medial parietal lobes that encode two fundamental spatial quantities—location and facing direction—in a manner that abstracts away from sensory inputs. University students were scanned while viewing photographs taken at several familiar campus locations. Multivoxel pattern analyses indicated that the left presubiculum, retrosplenial complex, and parietal-occipital sulcus coded location identity even across non-overlapping views, whereas the right presubiculum coded facing direction even across noncontiguous locations. The location and direction codes supported by these regions may be critical to our ability to navigate within the extended environment and to understand its large-scale spatial structure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3873-12.2013

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vass, L. K., & Epstein, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-04-03
Volume
33
Issue
14
Pages
6133-6142
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2046415503
Cited by
131
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0541957)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-EY016464)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY016464)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F31NS074729)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
spatial representation, location encoding, wayfinding, presubiculum, retrosplenial complex, medial temporal lobe, navigation, multi-voxel pattern analysis
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review