Canonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain
Open accessAbstract
The structure and function of the human brain are highly stereotyped, implying a conserved molecular program responsible for its development, cellular structure and function. We applied a correlation-based metric called differential stability to assess reproducibility of gene expression patterning across 132 structures in six individual brains, revealing mesoscale genetic organization. The genes with the highest differential stability are highly biologically relevant, with enrichment for brain-related annotations, disease associations, drug targets and literature citations. Using genes with high differential stability, we identified 32 anatomically diverse and reproducible gene expression signatures, which represent distinct cell types, intracellular components and/or associations with neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Genes in neuron-associated compared to non-neuronal networks showed higher preservation between human and mouse; however, many diversely patterned genes displayed marked shifts in regulation between species. Finally, highly consistent transcriptional architecture in neocortex is correlated with resting state functional connectivity, suggesting a link between conserved gene expression and functionally relevant circuitry.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper applies a correlation-based “differential stability” (DS) metric to Allen Human Brain Atlas expression data across 132 structures in six adult human brains to identify conserved transcriptional organization. It reports 32 reproducible co-expression modules, links high-DS genes to brain function, disease, and drug targets, compares module conservation with mouse, and finds that conserved cortical gene expression correlates with resting-state functional connectivity.
Key findings
- DS ranged from ΔBR=0.970 to −0.057 across 17,348 uniquely annotated human transcripts; the highest-DS gene was FOXG1 (ΔBR=0.970), and PCDH8 had ΔBR=0.931. The top 10% DS genes (n=1735) were enriched for neuronal functional categories, drug interactions (first decile had 4651 small-molecule/chemical interactions, more than 30 times the third decile), and disease gene sets including mental disorders (p<8.06e-31), schizophrenia (p<9.14e-30), autism (p<3.45e-17), epilepsy (p<1.00e-11), bipolar disorder (p<4.94e-14), and major depression (p<4.60e-10).
- A consensus WGCNA network built from the 50% highest DS genes (ΔBR>0.5284, g=8674) identified 32 modules; 90.1% (15,627) of genes correlated with these patterns at kME>0.4. Modules ranged from largely neuronal (M1–M15) to essentially non-neuronal (M16–M32), with examples including M6 in cortex, M10 in striatum, M11 in thalamus, M12 in substantia nigra, M14 in hypothalamus, M16 in dentate gyrus, and M17 in cerebellum; M25 was associated with immune response (q<3.71e-35) and M30 with myelination/glial ensheathment (q<1.48e-06).
- In human-mouse comparison using 53 matched mouse structures and 2651 genes, neuron-associated modules such as M1, M6, and M7 were better preserved than many non-neuronal modules (M25–M32), though individual genes within even preserved modules sometimes shifted patterning between species.
- In cortex, the top 5th percentile of cortical DS genes (n=867) had ΔCTX>0.357 versus ΔBR>0.854 for whole brain, and only 31% of the top 5% cortical DS genes were in the top 5% of brain-wide DS. Higher cortical DS predicted stronger correlation between functional connectivity and gene expression (ρ=0.46, p<2.2e-16); 136 genes whose polymorphisms affect resting-state functional connectivity had higher expression-connectivity correlation (μ=0.12, p<2.2e-192) and higher cortical DS (ΔCTX=0.40, p<1.2e-325).
Methods
- Data came from the Allen Human Brain Atlas: six neurotypical adult whole brains (3 Caucasian males, 2 African American males, 1 Caucasian woman), with 345–911 samples per brain spanning one or both hemispheres, 232 discrete brain structures sampled at least once, and 132 structures used for the main analysis; expression was profiled with whole-genome Agilent microarrays.
- DS was defined as the average Pearson correlation across 15 pairs of the six brains over a set of anatomic regions; WGCNA was used to construct a consensus co-expression network from the top 50% DS genes, with modules assigned by kME>0.4 and functionally annotated using ToppGene and related databases.
- Cross-species comparison used Allen Mouse Brain Atlas in situ hybridization expression energy for 2651 genes across 53 matched mouse structures; functional connectivity analysis used Human Connectome Project resting-state fMRI data, including a dense connectome from 468 subjects and parcellated connectomes from 447 subjects across 52 left-hemisphere parcels, then correlated gene co-expression matrices with the connectome matrix.
Limitations
- The paper states possible ascertainment bias in regional transcriptional patterns because they may be preferentially annotated in available studies, and notes that approximately 9% of the most conserved gene set has no functional annotation to date.
- The paper states that the mouse comparison used 2651 genes initially chosen because they were potentially biologically interesting, making that set biased; specific proportions of cross-species agreement may not represent the whole transcriptome, though gene assignments as conserved or not should reflect actual conservation in these datasets.
- The paper states that functional connectivity from fMRI is an indirect measure and should not be considered a surrogate for direct anatomical connectivity; it also notes that anatomical sampling was not cell type-specific, and that direct comparisons with previous studies are challenging due to differences in analysis strategies and experimental design.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 21 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Genes in neuron-associated compared to non-neuronal networks showed higher preservation between human and mouse.
“Genes in neuron-associated compared to non-neuronal networks showed higher preservation between human and mouse; however, many diversely-patterned genes displayed dramatic shifts in regulation between species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Applying a correlation-based metric of differential stability (DS) to gene expression across 132 structures in six individual brains reveals meso-scale genetic organization.
“We applied a correlation-based metric of “differential stability” (DS) to assess reproducibility of gene expression patterning across 132 structures in six individual brains, revealing meso-scale genetic organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using high DS genes, the authors identified 32 anatomically diverse and reproducible gene expression signatures.
“Using high DS genes we identified 32 anatomically diverse and reproducible gene expression signatures, which represent distinct cell types, intracellular components, and/or associations with neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Large transcriptional differences are seen between major brain structures.
“Large transcriptional differences are seen between major structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using the six brains, the authors identified a consensus network common to all brains using the 50% highest DS genes (ΔBR>0.5284, g=8674).
“Using the six brains now available, we identified a consensus network22 common to all brains (Fig. 3a, panel 1), using the 50% highest DS genes (ΔBR>0.5284, g=8674, Supplementary Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Langfelder, P., Luo, R., Oldham, M. & Horvath, S. Is my network module preserved and reproducible? PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001057 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The consensus network identified 32 major transcriptional patterns, or modules, each represented by a characteristic expression pattern across brain structures, the module eigengene (ME), in each brain.
“This network identified 32 major transcriptional patterns, or modules, each represented by a characteristic expression pattern across brain structures, the module eigengene (ME), in each brain (Fig. 3a, panel 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The patterning for any given gene across structures in different individuals is often well conserved.
“In addition to globally conserved differential relationships, the patterning for any given gene across structures in different individuals is often well conserved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The enrichment of mental disorder gene sets in top DS genes was independently reproduced in gene sets from the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative Database and Alzheimer's-related genes from the Alzheimer's Forum.
“This result was independently reproduced in gene sets from the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative Database (https://gene.sfari.org/autdb/Welcome.do; n=666; p<1.19e-38) and Alzheimer’s-related genes from the Alzheimer’s Forum (www.alzforum.org; n=630; p<3.55e-07).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The top 10th percentile set of genes (n=1735) ranked by DS is significantly over-represented in many functional categories, including GO molecular function, cellular component and biological processes associated with neuronal function, and transcription factor binding sites.
“The top 10th percentile set of genes (n=1735) ranked by DS is significantly over-represented in many functional categories (Fig. 2d), including gene ontology (GO) molecular function, cellular component and biological processes associated with neuronal function, and transcription factor binding sites (Supplementary Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Each module also contained genes that were not only poorly correlated to the human module, but were instead very highly correlated (ρ > 0.8) to a different human module eigengene.
“Interestingly, each module also contained genes that were not only poorly correlated to the human module, but were instead very highly correlated (ρ > 0.8) to a different human module eigengene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cortex, cerebellum, and amygdala are notably homogenous across their constituent subdivisions.
“In contrast, cortex, cerebellum, and amygdala are notably homogenous across their constituent subdivisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many diversely-patterned genes displayed dramatic shifts in regulation between species.
“Genes in neuron-associated compared to non-neuronal networks showed higher preservation between human and mouse; however, many diversely-patterned genes displayed dramatic shifts in regulation between species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Highly consistent transcriptional architecture in neocortex is correlated with resting state functional connectivity.
“Finally, highly consistent transcriptional architecture in neocortex is correlated with resting state functional connectivity, suggesting a link between conserved gene expression and functionally relevant circuitry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The relationship between anatomical structures based on top DS genes generally resembles the physical topography and developmental origins of brain regions.
“Consistent with this observation, the relationship between anatomical structures based on these top DS genes generally resembles the physical topography and developmental origins of brain regions, as shown by multidimensional scaling (MDS) in which distance is determined by correlation between samples (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Brain-related diseases are associated with higher DS genes.
“Finally, brain-related diseases are associated with higher DS genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The proportion of genes assigned to modules with high neuronal expression (M1-M15) was significantly greater for the highest DS gene set (top 10%).
“Interestingly, the proportion of genes assigned to modules with high neuronal expression (M1-M15, blue in Fig. 3d) was significantly greater for the highest DS gene set (top 10%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PCDH8 has high DS, with ΔBR=0.931.
“PCDH8 (shown in Fig. 1B) also has high DS, with ΔBR=0.931.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The gene with highest DS is FOXG1 (ΔBR=0.970).
“The gene with highest DS is FOXG1 (ΔBR=0.970), a transcription factor regulating the development of the early born Cajal-Retzius cells in the cerebral cortex18, 19.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Patterns identified using any five brains could be found reproducibly in the sixth.
“Furthermore, these patterns are likely to be representative of a larger population as they are highly consistent across all six individuals, and patterns identified using any five brains could be found reproducibly in the sixth (Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Calcium channels and genes associated with calcium/calmodulin signaling (NRGN, CAMK2A, CAMKV) are overrepresented among high DS genes (p<1.32e-04, BH corrected).
“Calcium channels and genes associated with calcium/calmodulin signaling (NRGN, CAMK2A, CAMKV) are overrepresented among high DS genes (p<1.32e-04, BH corrected) indicating a strong conservation of these signaling pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is no significant relationship (ρ=0.064) between mean gene expression level and high DS.
“The DS metric selects for genes with moderate to high expression level and moderate to high variability across structures; however, there is no significant relationship (ρ=0.064) between mean gene expression level and high DS (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
A small set of highly patterned and consistent genes were not correlated to these consensus networks but rather showed unique patterns.
“A small set of highly patterned and consistent genes were not correlated to these consensus networks but rather showed unique patterns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The lack of conservation for glial modules was observed both anatomically and in the within-module correlation of glial genes, which is independent of anatomical distribution.
“this lack of conservation for glial modules was observed both anatomically and also in the within-module correlation of glial genes which is independent of anatomical distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse ISH expression energy values are comparable to human microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.
- Rests on an assumption: Genes in mouse can be assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.
- Findingnone given
The DS metric, when applied only to neocortex where transcriptional variation is much less than between major brain regions, identifies genes that vary consistently across cortical regions.
“The DS metric, when applied only to neocortex where transcriptional variation is much less than between major brain regions, identifies genes that vary consistently across cortical regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Many individual genes shift their global expression from one major pattern to another.
“many individual genes shift their global expression from one major pattern to another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse ISH expression energy values are comparable to human microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.
- Rests on an assumption: Genes in mouse can be assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.
- Findingown data
There is a significant correlation between the transcriptional patterning in the neocortex and functional connectivity (as manifested by the partial correlation functional connectivity matrix), obtained with an independent imaging dataset (HCP).
“As before28, we report here a significant correlation between the transcriptional patterning in the neocortex and functional connectivity (as manifested by the partial correlation functional connectivity matrix), and we obtain this result with an independent imaging dataset (HCP).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Richiardi, J. et al. Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks. Science 348, 1241–1244 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The AHBA tissue samples can be mapped to the HCP 52 region parcellation such that gene expression can be compared to functional connectivity.
- Findingown data
The different co-expression networks vary in their conservation between species.
“Here we find that the different co-expression networks vary in their conservation between species as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse ISH expression energy values are comparable to human microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.
- Rests on an assumption: Genes in mouse can be assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.
- Findingreasoning
This correlation was only evident for genes having consistent cortical patterning across individuals (i.e., high DS in cortex).
“This correlation was only evident for genes having consistent cortical patterning across individuals (i.e., high DS in cortex)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There exists a relatively small (32) set of consensus co-expression gene networks that explain the vast majority (90.1%, ρ>0.4) of transcriptional variation across adult brain regions.
“Taking this concept of conserved patterning from genes to gene networks, we demonstrate the existence of a relatively small (32) set of consensus co-expression gene networks that explain the vast majority (90.1%, ρ>0.4) of transcriptional variation across adult brain regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes with non-specific patterning or ubiquitous expression tend to represent more basal cell functions.
“While we recognize there may remain ascertainment bias in the selection of regional transcriptional patterns insofar as they may be preferentially annotated in available studies, these findings appear relevant as we find that genes with non-specific patterning or ubiquitous expression tend to represent more basal cell functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many genes show highly consistent patterns of transcriptional regulation across brain regions that can be quantified using DS.
“Using the rich microarray profiling dataset in the Allen Human Brain Atlas (http://human.brain-map.org), we demonstrate that many genes show highly consistent patterns of transcriptional regulation across brain regions that can be quantified using a metric of differential stability (DS).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Glial modules are among the most stable and robust in the brain despite the lack of strict anatomical segregation.
“glial modules are among the most stable and robust in the brain despite the lack of strict anatomical segregation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The high cortical DS genes represent the consistent transcriptional features.
“these genes represent the consistent transcriptional features”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The high cortical DS genes show more variation across cortex.
“the high cortical DS genes show more variation across cortex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These genes are preferentially correlated with resting state functional cortical architecture.
“these genes are preferentially correlated with resting state functional cortical architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both the co-expression statistics and anatomical patterning of neuron-associated modules were better preserved than glia-associated modules.
“both the co-expression statistics and anatomical patterning of neuron-associated modules were better preserved than glia-associated modules”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse ISH expression energy values are comparable to human microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.
- Rests on an assumption: Genes in mouse can be assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.
- Interpretationown data
Conserved cortical genes correlate most strongly with cortical functional connectivity.
“Fig. 7d shows that higher cortical DS of a gene is predictive of a stronger correlation between functional connectivity and cortical gene expression pattern (ρ = 0.46, p<2.2e-16; the correlation with brain-wide DS alone was much weaker (ρ=0.17), indicating that the conserved cortical genes correlate most strongly with cortical functional connectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Tightly regulated structural transcription is quite important for brain function and dysfunction.
“Taken together these observations indicate that tightly regulated structural transcription is quite important for brain function and dysfunction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The correlation between conserved cortical gene expression and functional connectivity suggests a link between conserved gene expression and functionally relevant circuitry.
“Finally, highly consistent transcriptional architecture in neocortex is correlated with resting state functional connectivity, suggesting a link between conserved gene expression and functionally relevant circuitry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The DS metric applied to cortex alone identifies genes having more subtle but consistent variation across functionally defined cortical parcels that is not captured when highly distinct structures across the whole brain are included.
“Thus, the DS metric applied to cortex alone identifies genes having more subtle but consistent variation across functionally defined cortical parcels that is not captured when highly distinct structures across the whole brain are included.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Genes with the most consistent anatomical patterning across individuals appear to be particularly significant for brain function and disease.
“Those genes with the most consistent anatomical patterning across individuals appear to be particularly significant for brain function and disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Some of these networks appear to represent co-expression in broad cell classes such as telencephalic neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes and vasculature.
“Although the anatomical sampling in this study was not cell type-specific, some of these networks appear to represent co-expression in broad cell classes such as telencephalic neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes and vasculature, as observed previously3, 5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Hawrylycz, M.J. et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489, 391–399 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Oldham, M.C. et al. Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1271–1282 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Transcriptional regulation patterns are informative about human brain organization at multiple scales.
“Transcriptional regulation patterns are informative about human brain organization at multiple scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Many of the core co-expression networks described here at the meso-scale appear to reflect the underlying cellular architecture.
“many of the core co-expression networks described here at the meso-scale appear to reflect the underlying cellular architecture”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is likely that discrete cell types similarly display highly conserved transcriptional regulation critical to cellular function.
“it is likely that discrete cell types similarly display highly conserved transcriptional regulation critical to cellular function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These categories are consistent with a role for these genes in neuronal connectivity and function.
“These categories are consistent with a role for these genes in neuronal connectivity and function as suggested in other studies28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Richiardi, J. et al. Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks. Science 348, 1241–1244 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The canonical transcriptional architecture of the human brain may in some respects be considered a genetic analog to group average anatomical or functional architecture revealed by MRI.
“The canonical transcriptional architecture of the human brain may in some respects be considered a genetic analog to group average anatomical or functional architecture revealed by MRI40, 41, 42.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [40] Damoiseaux, J.S. et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13848–13853 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Greicius, M.D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A.L. & Menon, V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 253–258 (2003). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Richiardi, J. et al. Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks. Science 348, 1241–1244 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest DS genes are enriched for brain-related biological annotations, disease associations, drug targets, and literature citations.
“The highest DS genes are highly biologically relevant, with enrichment for brain-related biological annotations, disease associations, drug targets, and literature citations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPotassium channels are the most over-represented among high DS genes (p<1.70e-12), exhibiting diverse and specific expression patterns.
“Interestingly, potassium channels (p<1.70e-12) are the most over-represented among high DS genes, exhibiting diverse and specific expression patterns (Supplementary Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA smaller percentage of genes have high DS in cortex than in whole brain; the top 5th percentile (n=867) of DS cortex genes had ΔCTX>0.357 versus ΔBR>0.854 for whole brain, and the rank ordering of genes by whole-brain DS vs cortex-only DS differs markedly, with only 31% of the top 5% of cortical DS genes in the top 5% of brain-wide DS.
“A smaller percentage of genes have high DS in cortex (Fig. 7b); in contrast to whole brain, the top 5th percentile (n=867) of DS cortex genes had ΔCTX>0.357 versus ΔBR>0.854 for whole brain. The rank ordering of genes by whole-brain DS vs cortex-only DS differs markedly, with only 31% of the top 5% of cortical DS genes in the top 5% of brain-wide DS, (Fig. 7b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data136 genes whose polymorphisms significantly affect resting-state functional connectivity in a large sample of healthy adolescents have both higher correlation of expression with functional connectivity (μ=0.12, p<2.2e-192) and higher DS (ΔCTX=0.40, p<1.2e-325) in human cortex, though they constitute only a minority (15%) of the highest cortical 5th percentile DS genes.
“Further, we found that 136 genes whose polymorphisms significantly affect resting-state functional connectivity in a large sample of healthy adolescents28 have both higher correlation of expression with functional connectivity (μ=0.12, p<2.2e-192) and higher DS (ΔCTX=0.40, p<1.2e-325) in human cortex (red points, Fig. 7d), though they constitute only a minority (15%) of the highest cortical 5th p”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Richiardi, J. et al. Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks. Science 348, 1241–1244 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataA small number (302) of high DS genes appear to have unique spatial expression patterns and were not strongly correlated to any of the 32 module eigengenes; among these are extensively studied genes and regional markers; these genes are enriched in GPCR pathway and signaling events and over-represented for SNP-associated neurotransmission and neurodevelopment genes conferring susceptibility to某些 等
“Finally, a small number (302) of high DS genes appear to have unique spatial expression patterns, and were not strongly correlated to any of the 32 module eigengenes. 50 of these genes are shown in Figure 5, illustrating the diversity of their expression patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom a global anatomical perspective, the 32 gene modules were predominantly enriched either in the telencephalon or in non-telencephalic deeper brain structures, and individual modules were enriched in distinct combinations of structures and associated with distinct functional pathways, disease and drug interactions.
“From a global anatomical perspective, the 32 gene modules were predominantly enriched either in the telencephalon or in non-telencephalic deeper brain structures (Fig. 4a). Individual modules were enriched in distinct combinations of structures (Fig. 4b; Supplementary Figs. 5–8) and were associated with distinct functional pathways, disease and drug interactions (Table 1; Supplementary Fig. 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLow DS genes with ubiquitous expression are typically not brain specific and are enriched for housekeeping functions such as RNA binding, KEGG spliceosome pathway, and mitochondrial ribosomal proteins.
“In contrast, low DS genes with ubiquitous expression (lower 25th percentile in variability across brain regions, below the horizontal green line in Fig. 2b; Supplementary Table 3), such as the ubiquitin isoforms UBB and UBC, are typically not brain specific. Instead, they appear to provide the basal machinery common to all cell and are enriched for housekeeping functions such as RNA binding (p<3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a clear ordering of modules based on predominance of neuronal gene expression, and the proportions ranged widely from largely neuronal signatures (M1-M15) to essentially non-neuronal (M16-M32).
“While not a perfect comparison given the differences between species and in vivo versus in vitro, there was a clear ordering of modules that could be seen based on predominance of neuronal gene expression (Fig. 3c). These proportions ranged widely from those with largely neuronal signatures (M1-M15) to essentially non-neuronal (M16-M32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome modules were well preserved between human and mouse, including the neuronal-enriched modules M1, M6 and M7, whereas many of the most non-neuronal modules (M25-M32) were poorly preserved.
“Some modules were well preserved (Fig. 6a), including the neuronal-enriched modules M1, M6 and M7, whereas many of the most non-neuronal modules (M25-M32) were poorly preserved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHigher cortical DS of a gene is predictive of a stronger correlation between functional connectivity and cortical gene expression pattern (ρ = 0.46, p<2.2e-16), while the correlation with brain-wide DS alone was much weaker (ρ=0.17).
“Fig. 7d shows that higher cortical DS of a gene is predictive of a stronger correlation between functional connectivity and cortical gene expression pattern (ρ = 0.46, p<2.2e-16; the correlation with brain-wide DS alone was much weaker (ρ=0.17), indicating that the conserved cortical genes correlate most strongly with cortical functional connectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGene sets associated with mental disorders are significantly enriched in the top 10% of DS genes, in particular those for schizophrenia, autism, epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and major depression.
“Genes sets associated with mental disorders (p<8.06e-31) are significantly enriched in the top 10% of DS genes (Fig. 2f; Supplementary Table 5), in particular those for schizophrenia (p<9.14e-30), autism (p<3.45e-17), epilepsy (p<1.00e-11), bipolar disorder (p<4.94e-14), and major depression (p<4.60e-10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataM12 is uniquely associated with dopamine biosynthesis and cocaine addiction; M19 is associated with mitochondria and demyelination and has strong disease associations with Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Leigh's syndrome; and M25 is enriched in the glia-rich corpus callosum and internal portion of the globus pallidus and is associated with immune response and systemic lupus erythemetosis.
“In agreement with known function, M12 is uniquely associated with dopamine biosynthesis (q<8.39e-06) and cocaine addiction (q<5.64e-05). Other modules showed more complex anatomical patterning, such as non-telencephalic expression (M19), the inverse of M1. M19 is associated with mitochondria (q<5.50e-82) and demyelination (q<2.57e-04), and has strong disease associations with Alzheimer’s (q<3.98e-”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIndividual genes with matching anatomical and cellular patterns could be found for each module, but for each module there were also genes whose pattern fundamentally shifts between species; even in highly preserved modules, some individual genes differ in their patterning across species, and the frequency of these changes varies by module with better general pattern conservation in more strongly n
“Despite this variation in the overall strength of correlation across species, individual genes with matching anatomical and cellular patterns could be found for each module (left 2 ISH panels in Fig. 6c–g). On the other hand, for each module there were genes whose pattern fundamentally shifts between species (far right ISH panels), for example from thalamic to cerebellar in M11 or from glial to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe great majority of all genes (90.1%, 15,627) are correlated with this relatively small set of patterns, and the MEs derived from these genes are highly stable.
“The great majority of all genes (90.1%, 15,627) are correlated with this relatively small set of patterns (Supplementary Table 6), and the MEs derived from these genes are highly stable (Fig. 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataOver 96% of all annotations were associated with just 17 of the 32 modules; modules M1-M6 contain by far the most neuronal function-related annotations; and the most non-neuronal modules (M21-M32) show strong and unique associations with vasculature development, immune system function, and myelination and glial ensheathment.
“Interestingly, over 96% of all annotations were associated with just 17 of the 32 modules (left-most in Fig. 3e) including those restricted to the highly studied nigro-striatal pathway structures associated with Parkinson’s disease (M10 and M12) as well as a set of predominantly non-neuronal modules (M24, M23, M25, M30; Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe top DS genes have a disproportionate number of drug interactions and a monotonically decreasing association with miRNA targets.
“Furthermore, the top DS genes have a disproportionate number of drug interactions and a monotonically decreasing association with miRNA targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite massive differences in size and measurement techniques of the two data modalities, many of the modules had very highly correlated expression across specific anatomical regions; for example, M6, M10, M11 and M17 had nearly identical patterning, whereas M30 was very poorly correlated.
“Despite massive differences in size and measurement techniques of these two data modalities, many of the modules had very highly correlated expression across specific anatomical regions (Fig. 6c–g). For example, the forebrain-enriched and neuron-associated M6, striatal M10, thalamic M11 and cerebellar M17 had nearly identical patterning. In contrast, the module eigengenes for the non-neuronal mod”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenApproximately 9% of the most conserved gene set has no functional annotation to date.
“Interestingly, approximately 9% of this most conserved gene set has no functional annotation to date, thus representing a set of rich targets for future research into human brain function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest 10% of brain-wide DS genes are substantially overrepresented for known drug targets and are highly significantly enriched for functional annotations of many cellular functions and biological pathways.
“Remarkably, the highest 10% of brain-wide DS genes are substantially overrepresented for known drug targets and are highly significantly enriched for functional annotations of many cellular functions and biological pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe final set of networks showed consistent but more complex distributed anatomical patterning and were enriched in genes associated with organelles or cellular machinery such as mitochondria, the proteasome, ribonucleoprotein complexes and chromatin.
“The final set of networks were more difficult to interpret, showing consistent but more complex distributed anatomical patterning and enriched in genes associated with organelles or cellular machinery such as mitochondria, the proteasome, ribonucleoprotein complexes and chromatin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSignificant ontological categories of the highest cortical 5th percentile DS genes include main axon, neuron projection, calcium and sodium channel activity, and axon guidance Reactome pathway.
“Significant ontological categories of this highest cortical 5th percentile DS genes include main axon (p<7.84e-09), neuron projection (p<2.2e-04), calcium and sodium channel activity (p<3.46e-11), and axon guidance Reactome pathway (p<2.22e-04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMany of those genes are well studied as markers of specific cell types (e.g. VIP and SST for GABAergic interneurons) or developmental zones (homeobox genes) and are not representative of the patterning of the great majority of genes.
“Surprisingly, many of those genes are well studied as markers of specific cell types (e.g. VIP and SST for GABAergic interneurons) or developmental zones (homeobox genes) and are not representative of the patterning of the great majority of genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe 32 gene expression signatures represent distinct cell types, intracellular components, and/or associations with neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders.
“Using high DS genes we identified 32 anatomically diverse and reproducible gene expression signatures, which represent distinct cell types, intracellular components, and/or associations with neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFunctional brain networks determined using resting-state fMRI can be recapitulated using correlated gene expression in postmortem brain tissue.
“Recent work has revealed that functional brain networks determined using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can be recapitulated using correlated gene expression in postmortem brain tissue28.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Richiardi, J. et al. Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks. Science 348, 1241–1244 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese patterns are likely to be representative of a larger population as they are highly consistent across all six individuals.
“Furthermore, these patterns are likely to be representative of a larger population as they are highly consistent across all six individuals, and patterns identified using any five brains could be found reproducibly in the sixth (Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHuman neocortex shows variations in transcriptional patterns that are consistent across individuals and are correlated with topographical position across the cortical sheet.
“Despite its relative homogeneity compared to other brain regions, human neocortex shows variations in transcriptional patterns that are consistent across individuals and are correlated with topographical position across the cortical sheet3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Hawrylycz, M.J. et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489, 391–399 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis shift may represent a mechanism for species differentiation where mutations lead to dramatic shifts in gene regulation across brain regions.
“This may represent a mechanism for species differentiation where mutations lead to dramatic shifts in gene regulation across brain regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese networks may represent core intracellular pathways that tend to be co-expressed and also differentially enriched in particular brain regions.
“These networks may represent core intracellular pathways that tend to be co-expressed and also differentially enriched in particular brain regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDifferences in analysis strategies and experimental design make direct comparisons with previous studies challenging.
“Despite similarities in data type and methodology, these differences in analysis strategies and experimental design make direct comparisons with previous studies challenging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA study of ~700 genes in human versus mouse cortex by in situ hybridization found approximately 25% of genes having at least subtle differences in areal or cellular patterning.
“a study of ~700 genes in human versus mouse cortex by in situ hybridization found approximately 25% of genes having at least subtle differences in areal or cellular patterning39”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Zeng, H. et al. Large-scale cellular-resolution gene profiling in human neocortex reveals species-specific molecular signatures. Cell 149, 483–496 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFunctional connectivity as measured using fMRI is a powerful but indirect measure of network organization that can provide high spatial resolution but should not be considered a surrogate for direct anatomical connectivity.
“Functional connectivity as measured using fMRI is a powerful but indirect measure of network organization that can provide high spatial resolution but should not be considered a surrogate for direct anatomical connectivity29, 30.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMajor differences in glial structure and function between human and mice have been described.
“major differences in glial structure and function between human and mice have been described38”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Oberheim, N.A., Wang, X., Goldman, S. & Nedergaard, M. Astrocytic complexity distinguishes the human brain. Trends Neurosci. 29, 547–553 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTopological overlap has been shown to be a more biologically relevant metric than adjacency in many cases.
“Topological overlap has been shown to be a more biologically relevant metric than adjacency in many cases10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, 17 (2005). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese genes represent a functionally critical set whose transcriptional regulation is tightly controlled.
“This suggests that these genes represent a functionally critical set whose transcriptional regulation is tightly controlled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWithin each batch, array-specific biases characterized by probe GC content, location in the chip, and experiment-wise mean intensity are corrected.
“Within each batch, array-specific biases characterized by probe GC content, location in the chip, and experiment-wise mean intensity are corrected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA second set of networks show striking enrichment in specific brain regions such as the striatum, thalamus, cerebellum and substantia nigra, presumably reflecting unique and coherent expression signatures responsible for the functions of specific neuronal types in these regions.
“A second set of networks show striking enrichment in specific brain regions such as the striatum, thalamus, cerebellum and substantia nigra, presumably reflecting unique and coherent expression signatures responsible for the functions of specific neuronal types in these regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAdjustment is made due to the bias introduced in sample quality and expression level by different dissection methods.
“Adjustment is made due to the bias introduced in sample quality and expression level by different dissection methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationToppGene was used to calculate p-values from hypergeometric tests, corrected for multiple comparisons.
“ToppGene (https://toppgene.cchmc.org) portal24 was used to access an extensive list of databases, and to calculate p-values from hypergeometric tests, corrected for multiple comparisons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Chen, J., Bardes, E.E., Aronow, B.J. & Jegga, A.G. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W305–W311 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe same control samples are included in all batches to correct for non-biological systematic biases among batches.
“The same control samples are included in all batches to serve this purpose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenWithin a brain, cross-batch correction is done so that the mean expression levels of control samples in the batches may be aligned.
“Within a brain, cross-batch correction is done so that the mean expression levels of control samples in the batches may be aligned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe frequency of differences in gene expression between species appears to vary as a function of evolutionary distance.
“the frequency of differences appears to vary as a function of evolutionary distance37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Morris, J.A. et al. Divergent and nonuniform gene expression patterns in mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19049–19054 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThis study builds upon and complements initial results by sampling brain regions at relatively equal depth by decreasing representation of cortex and cerebellum in the analysis, and by performing a consensus network analysis that exclusively identifies common patterns across brains.
“This study builds upon and complements our initial results in two important ways: first, we sample brain regions at relatively equal depth by decreasing representation of cortex and cerebellum in the analysis, and second, we perform a consensus network analysis, which exclusively identifies common patterns across brains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA meta-analysis of microarray studies showed better preservation of neuronal gene co-expression compared to glial and disease-related genes.
“a meta-analysis of microarray studies which showed better preservation of neuronal gene co-expression compared to glial and disease-related genes36”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Miller, J.A., Horvath, S. & Geschwind, D.H. Divergence of human and mouse brain transcriptome highlights Alzheimer disease pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12698–12703 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAcross brains, brain-wise mean expressions as well as control samples' mean expression are aligned.
“Across brains, brain-wise mean expressions as well as control samples’ mean expression are aligned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe method for constructing consensus networks is entirely automated, resulting in an unbiased collection of distinct, yet well-defined modules.
“This method is entirely automated, resulting in an unbiased collection of distinct, yet well-defined modules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThese genes were distributed across all of the human modules and therefore represent a fairly complete set of expression patterns at the whole-brain level.
“these genes were distributed across all of the human modules and therefore represent a fairly complete set of expression patterns at the whole-brain level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse ISH expression energy values are comparable to human microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.
- Rests on an assumption: Genes in mouse can be assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataA significance value for each gene-connectivity comparison was obtained using randomized gene co-expression matrices.
“We also obtained a significance value for each gene-connectivity comparison using the randomized gene co-expression matrices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWhile the specific proportions of genes that agree between species may not be representative of the transcriptome as a whole, the assignment of genes as either conserved or not conserved should accurately reflect their actual conservation based on these two data sets.
“While the specific proportions of genes that agree between species may not be representative of the transcriptome as a whole, the assignment of genes as either conserved or not conserved in the text should accurately reflect their actual conservation based on these two data sets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse ISH expression energy values are comparable to human microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.
- Rests on an assumption: Genes in mouse can be assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationEach of four 15-min resting state runs for each subject was cleaned (denoised) using 24-parameter motion regression followed by ICA+FIX denoising.
“Each of four 15-min resting state runs for each subject in the group was cleaned (denoised) using 24-parameter motion regression followed by ICA+FIX denoising30, 48.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] Smith, S.M. et al. Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 666–682 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Salimi-Khorshidi, G. et al. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage 90, 449–468 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenStatistical tests were chosen such that the data meet assumptions of the specific statistical test.
“To the best of our knowledge, statistical tests were chosen such that the data meet assumptions of the specific statistical test.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe 2651 genes used for mouse comparison were initially chosen to be run in coronal section because they were potentially biologically interesting, and therefore represent a biased set of genes.
“these 2651 genes were initially chosen to be run in coronal section because they were potentially biologically interesting in some way, and therefore represent a biased set of genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse ISH expression energy values are comparable to human microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.
- Rests on an assumption: Genes in mouse can be assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll p-values in the module enrichment analysis were Bonferroni corrected for multiple hypergeometric test comparisons.
“All p-values in this analysis were Bonferroni corrected for multiple hypergeometric test comparisons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The structure and function of the human brain are highly stereotyped.
“The structure and function of the human brain are highly stereotyped, implying a conserved molecular program responsible for its development, cellular structure, and function.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The general anatomical positioning of and connectivity between brain regions is highly stereotyped between individuals.
“Despite a range of brain sizes across individuals and variation in sulcal patterning in the neocortex, the general anatomical positioning of and connectivity between regions is highly stereotyped between individuals, suggesting that a significant proportion of the transcriptional coding for this common architecture is conserved across the human population.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A significant proportion of the transcriptional coding for the common brain architecture is conserved across the human population.
“Despite a range of brain sizes across individuals and variation in sulcal patterning in the neocortex, the general anatomical positioning of and connectivity between regions is highly stereotyped between individuals, suggesting that a significant proportion of the transcriptional coding for this common architecture is conserved across the human population.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mouse ISH expression energy values are comparable to human microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.
“These values were treated the same way as microarray intensities for between-species correlations and network statistics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Genes in mouse can be assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.
“Genes in mouse were assigned to the same modules as their human orthologs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The AHBA tissue samples can be mapped to the HCP 52 region parcellation such that gene expression can be compared to functional connectivity.
“The next step is to map the Allen Human Brain Atlas (AHBA) tissue samples to the HCP 52 region parcellation so that comparison can be made.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High differential stability appears to be a hallmark of genes with considerable biological relevance.
“high differential stability appears to be a hallmark of genes with considerable biological relevance40.”
From Oxytocin pathway gene networks in the human brain (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
High differential stability is indicative of highly consistent patterning across donor brains.
“which is indicative of highly consistent patterning across donor brains40.”
From Oxytocin pathway gene networks in the human brain (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Mouse regional expression is described as averaged over different voxel sets
MajorOne methods section says mouse expression energy was averaged across all voxels in each matched structure. Another says it was averaged over only the 250 most highly expressed voxels, except in regions with fewer than 250 voxels.
“For each of 53 human structures, average expression energy was calculated across all voxels in matched mouse structures.”
“In mouse, the data was processed by finding the average expression energy (see web documentation above) of the 250 most highly expressed voxels in each of the 53 regions (or all voxels if fewer than 250 in a region)”
Autworks disease-set count differs between sections
MinorThe results give 2,289 Autworks gene sets, while the methods describe the same database as listing 2,288 disease states. The text does not explain the one-set difference.
“based on 2289 gene sets from the Autworks database”
“For disease annotations we used the Autworks database (http://autworks.hms.harvard.edu), listing genes associated with 2,288 disease states, including Autism.”
Cites
WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis
Langfelder, P., & Horvath, S. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 · Cited by 27,252 · see citing works
The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Thomas Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., Roffman, J. L., Smoller, J. W., Zöllei, L., Polimeni, J. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011 · Cited by 9,182 · see citing works
The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00339.2011 · Cited by 7,304 · see citing works
Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0135058100 · Cited by 6,358 · see citing works
Self-citationA General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis
Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2005) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1128 · Cited by 5,684 · see citing works
The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview
Van Essen, D. C., Smith, S. M., Barch, D. M., Behrens, T. E. J., Yacoub, E., & Ugurbil, K. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 · Cited by 5,651 · see citing works
Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain
Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05453 · Cited by 5,572 · see citing works
Self-citationConsistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects
Damoiseaux, J. S., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M., & Beckmann, C. F. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601417103 · Cited by 4,326 · see citing works
Cahoy, J. D., Emery, B., Kaushal, A., Foo, L. C., Zamanian, J. L., Christopherson, K. S., Xing, Y., Lubischer, J. L., Krieg, P. A., Krupenko, S. A., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4178-07.2008 · Cited by 3,129 · see citing works
An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome
Hawrylycz, M. J., Lein, E. S., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Shen, E. H., Ng, L., Miller, J. A., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Smith, K. A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11405 · Cited by 3,083 · see citing works
Self-citationToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization
Chen, J., Bardes, E. E., Aronow, B. J., & Jegga, A. G. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp427 · Cited by 2,952 · see citing works
Self-citationProbabilistic Independent Component Analysis for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Beckmann, C. F., & Smith, S. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2003.822821 · Cited by 2,707 · see citing works
Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain
Kang, H. J., Kawasawa, Y. I., Cheng, F., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Li, M., Sousa, A. M. M., Pletikos, M., Meyer, K. A., Sedmak, G., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10523 · Cited by 2,084 · see citing works
Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R
Langfelder, P., Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm563 · Cited by 1,892 · see citing works
Transcriptomic Analysis of Autistic Brain Reveals Convergent Molecular Pathology
Voineagu, I., Wang, X., Johnston, P., Lowe, J. K., Tian, Y., Horvath, S., Mill, J., Cantor, R. M., Blencowe, B. J., & Geschwind, D. H. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10110 · Cited by 1,874 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, Kang et al (2011) created a network using data from six brain structures across pre-and post-natal development and found modules related to different spatiotemporal profiles 4 , while Voineagu et al (2011) studied changes in expression modules in the autistic brain 7 .”
Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Douaud, G., Beckmann, C. F., Glasser, M. F., Griffanti, L., & Smith, S. M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.046 · Cited by 1,770 · see citing works
Self-citationResting-state fMRI in the human connectome project
Smith, S. M., Beckmann, C. F., Andersson, J., Auerbach, E. J., Bijsterbosch, J., Douaud, G., Duff, E., Feinberg, D. A., Griffanti, L., Harms, M. P., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.039 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works
Self-citationTranscriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain
Miller, J. A., Ding, S.-L., Sunkin, S. M., Smith, K. A., Ng, L., Szafer, A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., Royall, J. J., Aiona, K., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13185 · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
Self-citationIs My Network Module Preserved and Reproducible?
Langfelder, P., Luo, R., Oldham, M. C., & Horvath, S. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001057 · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI
Smith, S. M., Vidaurre, D., Beckmann, C. F., Glasser, M. F., Jenkinson, M., Miller, K. L., Nichols, T. E., Robinson, E. C., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Woolrich, M. W., et al. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.016 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional organization of the transcriptome in human brain
Oldham, M. C., Konopka, G., Iwamoto, K., Langfelder, P., Kato, T., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2207 · Cited by 752 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Studies using these methods suggest that, largely because of their nonparametric statistically robust nature, conserved differential expression relationships may be more descriptive of transcriptome organization than absolute magnitude of expression level 3, 5, 11–13 .”
InfluentialAstrocytic complexity distinguishes the human brain
Oberheim, N. A., Wang, X., Goldman, S., & Nedergaard, M. (2006) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.08.004 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks
Richiardi, J., Altmann, A., Milazzo, A.-C., Chang, C., Chakravarty, M. M., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., Bokde, A. L. W., Bromberg, U., Büchel, C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1255905 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Self-citationConservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains
Oldham, M. C., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605938103 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Divergence of human and mouse brain transcriptome highlights Alzheimer disease pathways
Miller, J. A., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914257107 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Self-citationZeng, H., Shen, E. H., Hohmann, J. G., Oh, S. W., Bernard, A., Royall, J. J., Glattfelder, K. J., Sunkin, S. M., Morris, J. A., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.052 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Self-citationGene Coexpression Networks in Human Brain Identify Epigenetic Modifications in Alcohol Dependence
Ponomarev, I., Wang, S., Zhang, L., Harris, R. A., & Mayfield, R. D. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3136-11.2012 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Genome-wide association studies: potential next steps on a genetic journey
McCarthy, M. I., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2008) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn289 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Gene expression analyses reveal molecular relationships among 20 regions of the human CNS
Roth, R. B., Hevezi, P. A., Lee, J. S. H., Willhite, D., Lechner, S. M., Foster, A. C., & Zlotnik, A. (2006) · Neurogenetics · doi:10.1007/s10048-006-0032-6 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Strategies for aggregating gene expression data: The collapseRows R function
Miller, J. A., Cai, C., Langfelder, P., Geschwind, D. H., Kurian, S. M., Salomon, D. R., & Horvath, S. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-322 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman-Specific Transcriptional Networks in the Brain
Konopka, G., Friedrich, T., Davis‐Turak, J., Winden, K. D., Oldham, M. C., Gao, F., Chen, L., Wang, G.-Z., Luo, R., Preuss, T. M., et al. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.034 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Transcriptional Architecture of the Primate Neocortex
Bernard, A., Lubbers, L. S., Tanis, K. Q., Luo, R., Podtelezhnikov, A. A., Finney, E. M., McWhorter, M. M. E., Serikawa, K., Lemon, T., Morgan, R., et al. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.002 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroscience in the era of functional genomics and systems biology
Geschwind, D. H., & Konopka, G. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08537 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
The HapMap and Genome-Wide Association Studies in Diagnosis and Therapy
Manolio, T. A., & Collins, F. S. (2009) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.med.60.061907.093117 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Adult mouse brain gene expression patterns bear an embryologic imprint
Zapala, M. A., Hovatta, I., Ellison, J. A., Wodicka, L. M., Rio, J. A. D., Tennant, R. S., Tynan, W., Broide, R. S., Helton, R., Stoveken, B. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503357102 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
The MET Oncogene Is a Functional Marker of a Glioblastoma Stem Cell Subtype
Bacco, F. D., Casanova, E., Médico, E., Pellegatta, S., Orzan, F., Albano, R., Luraghi, P., Reato, G., D'Ambrosio, A., Porrati, P., et al. (2012) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3490 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The Role ofFoxg1and Dorsal Midline Signaling in the Generation of Cajal-Retzius Subtypes
Hanashima, C., Fernandes, M., Hébert, J. M., & Fishell, G. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1066-07.2007 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Relationships between Gene Expression and Brain Wiring in the Adult Rodent Brain
French, L., & Pavlidis, P. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001049 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Gratacòs, M., Costas, J., de Cid, R., Bayés, M., González, J. R., Baca‐García, E., de Diego‐Otero, Y., Fernández‐Aranda, F., Fernández‐Piqueras, J., Guitart, M., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30902 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Expression of complement messenger RNAs and proteins by human oligodendroglial cells
Hosokawa, M., Klegeris, A., Maguire, J. A., & McGeer, P. L. (2003) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.10234 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Association study of 182 candidate genes in anorexia nervosa
Pinheiro, A. P., Bulik, C. M., Thornton, L. M., Sullivan, P. F., Root, T. L., Bloss, C. S., Berrettini, W. H., Schork, N. J., Kaye, W. H., Bergen, A. W., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.31082 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Walker, D. G., Dalsing-Hernandez, J. E., & Lue, L. (2007) · Microvascular Research · doi:10.1016/j.mvr.2007.10.004 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
French, L., Tan, P. P. C., & Pavlidis, P. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2011.00012 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Divergent and nonuniform gene expression patterns in mouse brain
Morris, J. A., Royall, J. J., Bertagnolli, D., Boe, A. F., Burnell, J. J., Byrnes, E. J., Copeland, C., Desta, T., Fischer, S. R., Goldy, J., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003732107 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationSiegenthaler, J. A., & Miller, M. W. (2007) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.09.036 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Screening the human protocadherin 8 (PCDH8) gene in schizophrenia
Bray, N. J., Kirov, G., Owen, R. J., Jacobsen, N., Georgieva, L., Williams, H. J., Norton, N., Spurlock, G., Jones, S., Zammit, S., et al. (2002) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1034/j.1601-183x.2002.10307.x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Autworks: a cross-disease network biology application for Autism and related disorders
Nelson, T. H., Jung, J.-Y., DeLuca, T. F., Hinebaugh, B. K., Gabriel, K. C. S., & Wall, D. P. (2012) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/1755-8794-5-56 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Preservation of Ranking Order in the Expression of Human Housekeeping Genes
Shaw, G. T. W., Shih, E. S. C., Chen, C., & Hwang, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029314 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
A polymorphism in the complement component C1r is not associated with sporadic Alzheimer's disease
Rosenmann, H., Meiner, Z., Kahana, E., Aladjem, Z., Friedman, G., Ben‐Yehuda, A., Grenader, T., Wertman, E., & Abramsky, O. (2002) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01218-1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Richiardi, J. et al. Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks. Science 348, 1241–1244 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI
Schaefer, A., Kong, R., Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Zuo, X.-N., Holmes, A. J., Eickhoff, S. B., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx179 · Cited by 3,657 · see citing works
Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex
Hodge, R. D., Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., Smith, K. A., Barkan, E. R., Graybuck, L. T., Close, J. L., Long, B., Johansen, N., Penn, O., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1506-7 · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Human Connectome Project's neuroimaging approach
Glasser, M. F., Smith, S. M., Marcus, D. S., Andersson, J. L. R., Auerbach, E. J., Behrens, T. E. J., Coalson, T. S., Harms, M. P., Jenkinson, M., Moeller, S., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4361 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain
Lake, B. B., Ai, R., Kaeser, G. E., Salathia, N. S., Yung, Y. C., Liu, R., Wildberg, A., Gao, D., Fung, H.-L., Chen, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1204 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Jansen, P. R., Watanabe, K., Stringer, S., Skene, N., Bryois, J., Hammerschlag, A. R., de Leeuw, C., Benjamins, J. S., Muñoz‐Manchado, A. B., Nagel, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0333-3 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
A practical guide to linking brain-wide gene expression and neuroimaging data
Arnatkevičiūtė, A., Fulcher, B., & Fornito, A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.011 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Transcriptomic analysis of purified human cortical microglia reveals age-associated changes
Galatro, T. F., Holtman, I. R., Lerario, A. M., Vainchtein, I. D., Brouwer, N., Sola, P. R., Veras, M. M., Pereira, T. F., Leite, R. E. P., Möller, T., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4597 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Burt, J. B., Demirtaş, M., Eckner, W. J., Navejar, N. M., Ji, J. L., Martin, W. J., Bernacchia, A., Anticevic, A., & Murray, J. D. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0195-0 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Kong, R., Li, J., Orbán, C., Sabuncu, M. R., Liu, H., Schaefer, A., Sun, N., Zuo, X., Holmes, A. J., Eickhoff, S. B., et al. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy123 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Standardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox
Markello, R. D., Arnatkevičiūtė, A., Poline, J., Fulcher, B. D., Fornito, A., & Mišić, B. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.72129 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Generative modeling of brain maps with spatial autocorrelation
Burt, J. B., Helmer, M., Shinn, M., Anticevic, A., & Murray, J. D. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117038 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Tosches, M. A., Yamawaki, T. M., Naumann, R. K., Jacobi, A. A., Tushev, G., & Laurent, G. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar4237 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Human astrocytes: structure and functions in the healthy brain
Vasile, F., Dossi, E., & Rouach, N. (2017) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-017-1383-5 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Development and arealization of the cerebral cortex
Cadwell, C. R., Bhaduri, A., Mostajo-Radji, M. A., Keefe, M. G., & Nowakowski, T. J. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.009 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Bridging the Gap between Connectome and Transcriptome
Fornito, A., Arnatkevičiūtė, A., & Fulcher, B. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.005 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
A comprehensive transcriptional map of primate brain development
Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., Ding, S., Sunkin, S. M., Smith, K. A., Ng, L., Szafer, A., Dalley, R. A., Royall, J. J., Lemon, T. A., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18637 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Self-citationOxytocin pathway gene networks in the human brain
Quintana, D. S., Rokicki, J., van der Meer, D., Alnæs, D., Kaufmann, T., Córdova-Palomera, A., Dieset, I., Andreassen, O. A., & Westlye, L. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08503-8 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Li, J., Seidlitz, J., John Suckling, A., Fan, F., Ji, G., Meng, Y., Yang, S., Wang, K., Qiu, J., Chen, H., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21943-5 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Neuronal timescales are functionally dynamic and shaped by cortical microarchitecture
Gao, R., van den Brink, R. L., Pfeffer, T. A., & Voytek, B. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.61277 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Transcriptomic and morphophysiological evidence for a specialized human cortical GABAergic cell type
Boldog, E., Bakken, T. E., Hodge, R. D., Novotny, M., Aevermann, B. D., Baka, J., Bordé, S., Close, J. L., Diez-Fuertes, F., Ding, S.-L., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0205-2 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Self-citationMacroscopic gradients of synaptic excitation and inhibition in the neocortex
Wang, X. (2020) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0262-x · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Dissecting diagnostic heterogeneity in depression by integrating neuroimaging and genetics
Buch, A. M., & Liston, C. M. (2020) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-00789-3 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
The human connectome in Alzheimer disease — relationship to biomarkers and genetics
Yu, M., Sporns, O., & Saykin, A. J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-021-00529-1 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Genetic Control of Expression and Splicing in Developing Human Brain Informs Disease Mechanisms
Walker, R. L., Ramaswami, G., Hartl, C., Mancuso, N., Gandal, M. J., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Paşaniuc, B., Stein, J. L., & Geschwind, D. H. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.021 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
KaSP, Moberget, T., Doan, N. T., Alnæs, D., Kaufmann, T., Córdova‐Palomera, A., Lagerberg, T. V., Diedrichsen, J., Schwarz, E., Zink, M., et al. (2017) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.106 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Xia, M., Liu, J., Mechelli, A., Sun, X., Ma, Q., Wang, X., Wei, D., Chen, Y., Liu, B., Huang, C., et al. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01519-5 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Mapping gene transcription and neurocognition across human neocortex
Hansen, J. Y., Markello, R. D., Vogel, J. W., Seidlitz, J., Bzdok, D., & Mišić, B. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01082-z · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Vértes, P. E., Rittman, T., Whitaker, K. J., Romero-García, R., Váša, F., Kitzbichler, M. G., Wagstyl, K., Fonagy, P., Dolan, R. J., Jones, P. B., et al. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0362 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Kelley, K. W., Nakao-Inoue, H., Molofsky, A. V., & Oldham, M. C. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0216-z · Cited by 198 · see citing works
A mechanistic model of connector hubs, modularity and cognition
Bertolero, M. A., Yeo, B. T. T., Bassett, D. S., & D’Esposito, M. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0420-6 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Genetic mapping of etiologic brain cell types for obesity
Timshel, P. N., Thompson, J. J., & Pers, T. H. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.55851 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Krienen, F. M., Yeo, B. T. T., Ge, T., Buckner, R. L., & Sherwood, C. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510903113 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Romero-García, R., Whitaker, K. J., Váša, F., Seidlitz, J., Shinn, M., Fonagy, P., Dolan, R. J., Jones, P. B., Goodyer, I. M., Bullmore, E. T., et al. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.060 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Mouse and human share conserved transcriptional programs for interneuron development
Shi, Y., Wang, M., Mi, D., Lu, T., Wang, B., Dong, H., Zhong, S., Chen, Y., Sun, L., Zhou, X., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj6641 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Graph Theory and Brain Connectivity in Alzheimer’s Disease
del'Etoile, J., & Adeli, H. (2017) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858417702621 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Romero-García, R., Warrier, V., Bullmore, E. T., Baron‐Cohen, S., & Bethlehem, R. A. I. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0023-7 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Selective Neuronal Vulnerability in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Network-Based Analysis
Roussarie, J.-P., Yao, V., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, P., Oughtred, R., Rust, J., Plautz, Z., Kasturia, S., Albornoz, C., Wang, W., Schmidt, E. F., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.010 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Fulcher, B., Arnatkevičiūtė, A., & Fornito, A. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22862-1 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Understanding the genetic determinants of the brain with MOSTest
van der Meer, D., Frei, O., Kaufmann, T., Shadrin, A. A., Devor, A., Smeland, O. B., Thompson, W. K., Fan, C. C., Holland, D., Westlye, L. T., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17368-1 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Vogel, J. W., Joie, R. L., Grothe, M. J., Diaz-Papkovich, A., Doyle, A., Vachon‐Presseau, É., Lepage, C., de Wael, R. V., Thomas, R. A., Iturria‐Medina, Y., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14518-3 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Bardy, C., van den Hurk, M., Kakaradov, B., Erwin, J. A., Jaeger, B. N., Hernandez, R. V., Eames, T., Paucar, A. A., Gorris, M. A. J., Marchand, C., et al. (2016) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.158 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Robust estimation of cortical similarity networks from brain MRI
Sebenius, I., Seidlitz, J., Warrier, V., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Alexander‐Bloch, A. F., Mallard, T. T., Romero-García, R., Bullmore, E. T., & Morgan, S. E. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01376-7 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Spatial Patterning of Tissue Volume Loss in Schizophrenia Reflects Brain Network Architecture
Shafiei, G., Markello, R. D., Makowski, C., Talpalaru, A., Kirschner, M., Devenyi, G. A., Guma, E., Hagmann, P., Cashman, N. R., Lepage, M., et al. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.031 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Pagani, M., Barsotti, N., Bertero, A., Trakoshis, S., Ulysse, L., Locarno, A., Misevičiūtė, I., Felice, A. D., Canella, C., Supekar, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26131-z · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationTopographic gradients of intrinsic dynamics across neocortex
Shafiei, G., Markello, R. D., de Wael, R. V., Bernhardt, B. C., Fulcher, B., & Mišić, B. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.62116 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Molecular properties underlying regional vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease pathology
Grothe, M. J., Sepulcre, J., Gonzalez-Escamilla, G., Jelistratova, I., Schöll, M., Hansson, O., Teipel, S. J., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awy189 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Best Practices for Translational Disease Modeling Using Human iPSC-Derived Neurons
Engle, S. J., Blaha, L. C., & Kleiman, R. J. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.033 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Gene expression links functional networks across cortex and striatum
Anderson, K. M., Krienen, F. M., Choi, E. Y., Reinen, J. M., Yeo, B. T. T., & Holmes, A. J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03811-x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Identification of evolutionarily conserved gene networks mediating neurodegenerative dementia
Swarup, V., Hinz, F. I., Rexach, J. E., Noguchi, K.-I., Toyoshiba, H., Oda, A., Hirai, K., Sarkar, A., Seyfried, N. T., Cheng, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0223-3 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Coordinated cortical thickness alterations across six neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders
Hettwer, M. D., Larivière, S., Park, B., van den Heuvel, O. A., Schmaal, L., Andreassen, O. A., Ching, C. R. K., Hoogman, M., Buitelaar, J. K., van Rooij, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34367-6 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Lipidome atlas of the adult human brain
Osetrova, M., Tkachev, A., Mair, W., Larraz, P. G., Efimova, O., Kurochkin, I., Stekolshchikova, E., Anikanov, N. A., Foo, J. C., Cazenave‐Gassiot, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48734-y · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Local molecular and global connectomic contributions to cross-disorder cortical abnormalities
Hansen, J. Y., Shafiei, G., Vogel, J. W., Smart, K. A., Bearden, C. E., Hoogman, M., Franke, B., van Rooij, D., Buitelaar, J. K., McDonald, C. R., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32420-y · Cited by 125 · see citing works
The genetic architecture of human cortical folding
van der Meer, D., Kaufmann, T., Shadrin, A. A., Makowski, C., Frei, O., Roelfs, D., Sánchez, J. M., Linden, D. E. J., Rokicki, J., de Leeuw, C., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj9446 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The heritability of multi-modal connectivity in human brain activity
Colclough, G. L., Smith, S. M., Nichols, T. E., Winkler, A. M., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Glasser, M. F., Essen, D. C. V., & Woolrich, M. W. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.20178 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationDiverse reprogramming codes for neuronal identity
Tsunemoto, R. K., Lee, S., Szűcs, A. L., Chubukov, P., Sokolova, I., Blanchard, J., Eade, K., Bruggemann, J., Wu, C., Torkamani, A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0103-5 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Norbom, L. B., Ferschmann, L., Parker, N., Agartz, I., Andreassen, O. A., Paus, T., Westlye, L. T., & Tamnes, C. K. (2021) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102109 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Anderson, K. M., Collins, M. A., Chin, R., Ge, T., Rosenberg, M. D., & Holmes, A. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16710-x · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Toward Best Practices for Imaging Transcriptomics of the Human Brain
Arnatkevičiūtė, A., Markello, R. D., Fulcher, B., Mišić, B., & Fornito, A. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.10.016 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
A disinhibitory circuit motif and flexible information routing in the brain
Wang, X.-J., & Yang, G. R. (2018) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2018.01.002 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Imaging transcriptomics of brain disorders
Arnatkeviciute, A., Fulcher, B. D., Bellgrove, M. A., & Fornito, A. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.10.002 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Atlas of lesion locations and postsurgical seizure freedom in focal cortical dysplasia: A MELD study
Wagstyl, K., Whitaker, K. J., Raznahan, A., Seidlitz, J., Vértes, P. E., Foldes, S. T., Humphreys, Z., Hu, W., Mo, J., Likeman, M. J., et al. (2021) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.17130 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Gryglewski, G., Seiger, R., James, G. M., Godbersen, G. M., Komorowski, A., Unterholzner, J., Michenthaler, P., Hahn, A., Wadsak, W., Mitterhauser, M., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.068 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Patient-Tailored, Connectivity-Based Forecasts of Spreading Brain Atrophy
Brown, J. A., Deng, J., Neuhaus, J. M., Sible, I. J., Sias, A. C., Lee, S. E., Kornak, J., Marx, G. A., Karydas, A. M., Spina, S., et al. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.037 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Xue, K., Liang, S., Yang, B., Zhu, D., Xie, Y., Qin, W., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., & Yu, C. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003876 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Thomas, G. E. C., Zarkali, A., Ryten, M., Shmueli, K., Gil-Martínez, A. L., Leyland, L., McColgan, P., Acosta‐Cabronero, J., Lees, A. J., & Weil, R. S. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awab084 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The BIN1 rs744373 SNP is associated with increased tau-PET levels and impaired memory
Franzmeier, N., Rubinski, A., Neitzel, J., Ewers, M., (ADNI), T. A. D. N. I., Weiner, M. W., Aisen, P., Petersen, R., Jack, C. R., Jagust, W., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09564-5 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Shadrin, A. A., Kaufmann, T., van der Meer, D., Palmer, C. E., Makowski, C., Loughnan, R. J., Jernigan, T. L., Seibert, T. M., Hagler, D. J., Smeland, O. B., et al. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118603 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Park, B., Hong, S., Valk, S. L., Paquola, C., Benkarim, O. M., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Martino, A. D., Milham, M. P., Gozzi, A., Yeo, B. T. T., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21732-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Larivière, S., Royer, J., Rodríguez‐Cruces, R., Paquola, C., Caligiuri, M. E., Gambardella, A., Concha, L., Keller, S. S., Cendes, F., Yasuda, C. L., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31730-5 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Cerebral differences between dopamine-resistant and dopamine-responsive Parkinson’s tremor
Dirkx, M. F., Zach, H., van Nuland, A. J. M., Bloem, B. R., Toni, I., & Helmich, R. C. G. (2019) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awz261 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
International FTD-Genomics Consortium (IFGC), Yokoyama, J. S., Karch, C. M., Fan, C. C., Bonham, L. W., Kouri, N., Ross, O. A., Rademakers, R., Kim, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1693-y · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“For additional details regarding the dissection methods, quality control and normalization measures on this dataset, please see [19] and http:// human.”
MethodHuguet, G., Schramm, C., Douard, E., Jiang, L., Labbe, A., Tihy, F., Mathonnet, G., Nizard, S., Lemyre, E., Mathieu, A., et al. (2018) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0039 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Insights into the Neural and Genetic Basis of Vocal Communication
Konopka, G., & Roberts, T. F. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.039 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Martins, D., Giacomel, A., Williams, S., Turkheimer, F., Dipasquale, O., & Veronese, M. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110173 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Transcriptomic Perspectives on Neocortical Structure, Development, Evolution, and Disease
Lein, E. S., Belgard, T. G., Hawrylycz, M., & Molnár, Z. (2017) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-013858 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationRittman, T., Rubinov, M., Vértes, P. E., Patel, A. X., Ginestet, C. E., Ghosh, B. C. P., Barker, R. A., Spillantini, M. G., Bullmore, E. T., & Rowe, J. B. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.09.001 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Ji, G., Sun, J., Hua, Q., Zhang, L., Zhang, T., Bai, T., Wei, L., Wang, X., Qiu, B., Wang, K., et al. (2023) · Nature Mental Health · doi:10.1038/s44220-023-00111-2 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Delahaye‐Duriez, A., Srivastava, P. K., Shkura, K., Langley, S. R., Laaniste, L., Moreno‐Moral, A., Danis, B., Mazzuferi, M., Foerch, P., Gazina, E. V., et al. (2016) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1097-7 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
McColgan, P., Gregory, S., Seunarine, K. K., Razi, A., Papoutsi, M., Johnson, E. B., Dürr, A., Roos, R. A. C., Leavitt, B. R., Holmans, P., et al. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.019 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Innovations in 3D Tissue Models of Human Brain Physiology and Diseases
Lovett, M. L., Nieland, T. J. F., Dingle, Y. L., & Kaplan, D. L. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201909146 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Transcriptomic signatures of brain regional vulnerability to Parkinson’s disease
Keo, A., Mahfouz, A. E., Ingrassia, A. M. T., Meneboo, J., Villenet, C., Mutez, E., Comptdaer, T., Lelieveldt, B. P. F., Figeac, M., Chartier‐Harlin, M., et al. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0804-9 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Park, B., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Paquola, C., Larivière, S., Rodríguez‐Cruces, R., de Wael, R. V., Bullmore, E. T., Dolan, R. J., Goodyer, I. M., Fonagy, P., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64694 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Dear, R., Wagstyl, K., Seidlitz, J., Markello, R. D., Arnatkevičiūtė, A., Anderson, K. M., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Raznahan, A., Bullmore, E. T., & Vértes, P. E. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01624-4 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Proteomic analysis of postsynaptic proteins in regions of the human neocortex
Roy, M. M., Sorokina, O., Skene, N., Simonnet, C., Mazzo, F., Zwart, R., Sher, E., Smith, C., Armstrong, J. D., & Grant, S. G. N. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0025-9 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Zarkali, A., McColgan, P., Leyland, L., Lees, A. J., Rees, G. E., & Weil, R. S. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01622-9 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Hartl, C., Ramaswami, G., Pembroke, W. G., Muller, S., Pintacuda, G., Saha, A., Parsana, P., Battle, A. J., Lage, K., & Geschwind, D. H. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00887-5 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Parker, N., Patel, Y., Jackowski, A. P., Pan, P. M., Salum, G. A., Pausová, Z., & Paus, T. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1495 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Advances in transcriptome analysis of human brain aging
Ham, S., & Lee, S. (2020) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-020-00522-6 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Xie, Y., Xu, Z., Xia, M., Liu, J., Shou, X., Cui, Z., Liao, X., & Yong He, A. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.12.004 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
New pathogenic insights from large animal models of neurodegenerative diseases
Yin, P., Li, S., Li, X., & Yang, W. (2022) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-022-00912-8 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Neurology Individualized Medicine: When to Use Next-Generation Sequencing Panels
Klein, C. J., & Foroud, T. (2017) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.09.008 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Negi, S., & Guda, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00952-9 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Neurophysiological signatures of cortical micro-architecture
Shafiei, G., Fulcher, B., Voytek, B., Satterthwaite, T. D., Baillet, S., & Mišić, B. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41689-6 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Oxytocin receptor expression patterns in the human brain across development
Rokicki, J., Kaufmann, T., de Lange, A. G., van der Meer, D., Bahrami, S., Sartorius, A. M., Haukvik, U. K., Steen, N. E., Schwarz, E., Stein, D. J., et al. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-022-01305-5 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Interindividual variation in human cortical cell type abundance and expression
Johansen, N., Somasundaram, S., Travaglini, K. J., Yanny, A. M., Shumyatcher, M., Casper, T., Cobbs, C., Dee, N., Ellenbogen, R. G., Ferreira, M. L., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf2359 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationShafiei, G., Baillet, S., & Mišić, B. (2022) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001735 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Tang, X., Guo, Z., Chen, G., Sun, S., Xiao, S., Chen, P., Tang, G., Huang, L., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102240 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Spaethling, J. M., Na, Y.-J., Lee, J., Ulyanova, A. V., Baltuch, G. H., Bell, T. J., Brem, S. S., Chen, H. I., Dueck, H. R., Fisher, S. A., et al. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.066 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Effect Sizes of Deletions and Duplications on Autism Risk Across the Genome
Douard, E. A., Zeribi, A., Schramm, C., Tamer, P., Loum, M. A., Nowak, S., Saci, Z., Lord, M.-P., Rodríguez‐Herreros, B., Jean‐Louis, M., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19080834 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Can neuroimaging predict dementia in Parkinson’s disease?
Lanskey, J. H., McColgan, P., Schrag, A. E., Acosta‐Cabronero, J., Rees, G. E., Morris, H. R., & Weil, R. S. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awy211 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hawrylycz, M., Miller, J. A., Menon, V., Feng, D., Dolbeare, T., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Jegga, A. G., Aronow, B. J., Lee, C.-K., Bernard, A., Glasser, M. F., Dierker, D. L., Menche, J., Szafer, A., Collman, F., Grange, P., Berman, K. A., Mihalas, S., Yao, Z., Stewart, L., Barabási, A.-L., Schulkin, J., Phillips, J., Ng, L., Dang, C., Haynor, D. R., Jones, A., Van Essen, D. C., Koch, C., & Lein, E.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Northeastern University (US)
- Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hawrylycz, Michael
- Lein, Ed
- ORCID
- Hawrylycz, Michael
- Miller, Jeremy A
- Menon, Vilas
- Feng, David
- Dolbeare, Tim
- Guillozet-Bongaarts, Angela L
- Jegga, Anil G
- Aronow, Bruce J
- Lee, Chang-Kyu
- Bernard, Amy
- Glasser, Matthew F
- Dierker, Donna L
- Menche, Jörg
- Szafer, Aaron
- Collman, Forrest
- Grange, Pascal
- Yao, Zizhen
- Stewart, Lance
- Schulkin, Jay
- Phillips, John
- Ng, Lydia
- Haynor, David R
- Lein, Ed
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2015-11-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1832-1844
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC4700510
- OpenAlex
- W2260830658
- Semantic Scholar
- e3aa43b55cdd5d733360a178d938565fa201667a
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 24.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r33da027644-04, 5u54mh091657-05)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1U54 MH091657, U54-MH091657)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R33 DA027644, 4R33DA027644)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- differential stability, brain cell types, resting-state functional connectivity, neocortex, neurodevelopmental disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, therapeutic target, gene expression signatures
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Animals, Brain, Humans, Nerve Net, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review