Cited by 140Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Abilities and Testing

How does practice makes perfect?

Jonides, John·2004·Nature Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn0104-10

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jonides, J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Jonides, John
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2004-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
10-11
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1996900025
Cited by
140
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
working memory, learning, brain activation, behavioral strategies, neuroplasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Practice, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review