Cited by 91Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The impact of auditory working memory training on the fronto-parietal working memory network

Open access
Schneiders, Julia A., Opitz, Bertram, Tang, Huijun, Deng, Yuan, Xie, Chaoxiang, Li, Hong, Mecklinger, Axel·2012·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Working memory training has been widely used to investigate working memory processes. We have shown previously that visual working memory benefits only from intra-modal visual but not from across-modal auditory working memory training. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study we examined whether auditory working memory processes can also be trained specifically and which training-induced activation changes accompany theses effects. It was investigated whether working memory training with strongly distinct auditory materials transfers exclusively to an auditory (intra-modal) working memory task or whether it generalizes to a (across-modal) visual working memory task. We used adaptive n-back training with tonal sequences and a passive control condition. The memory training led to a reliable training gain. Transfer effects were found for the (intra-modal) auditory but not for the (across-modal) visual transfer task. Training-induced activation decreases in the auditory transfer task were found in two regions in the right inferior frontal gyrus. These effects confirm our previous findings in the visual modality and extents intra-modal effects in the prefrontal cortex to the auditory modality. As the right inferior frontal gyrus is frequently found in maintaining modality-specific auditory information, these results might reflect increased neural efficiency in auditory working memory processes. Furthermore, task-unspecific (amodal) activation decreases in the visual and auditory transfer task were found in the right inferior parietal lobule and the superior portion of the right middle frontal gyrus reflecting less demand on general attentional control processes. These data are in good agreement with amodal activation decreases within the same brain regions on a visual transfer task reported previously.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00173

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decreased activation in L-AG and R-IPL may reflect changes in task representations and reduced reliance on parietal engagement.

    “Decreased activation in the L–AG and R–IPL—parietal regions implicated in information maintenance and manipulation—may reflect changes in task representations and reduced reliance on parietal engagement56,67, consistent with their correlated changes and prior evidence for coupling between default-mode and frontoparietal control systems.”

    From Meta-analysis of computerised working memory training: behavioural gains, training parameters, transfer mechanisms, and neural correlates (2026) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Results (Brain imaging results; page unavailable) report decreased activation in the right inferior parietal lobule after auditory working-memory training. The Discussion (fMRI results; page unavailable) interprets this as reduced demand on attentional control, supporting the reduced-parietal-engagement interpretation. The paper does not establish the same decrease in the left angular gyrus or attribute these decreases to changed task representations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reduced activation in SFG and R-MFG may indicate diminished control demands with training or shifts in processing mode.

    “Similarly, reduced activation in the SFG and R–MFG—prefrontal nodes involved in sustained attention, updating, and interference control—may indicate diminished control demands with training or shifts in processing mode67,75,76.”

    From Meta-analysis of computerised working memory training: behavioural gains, training parameters, transfer mechanisms, and neural correlates (2026) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Discussion (fMRI results; page unavailable) links reduced activation in the superior portion of the right middle frontal gyrus to more efficient processing and less demand on attentional control. It does not report a corresponding decrease in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), and it describes strategic changes in processing after working-memory training as unlikely. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneiders, J. A., Opitz, B., Tang, H., Deng, Y., Xie, C., Li, H., & Mecklinger, A.
Affiliations
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Southwest University (CN)
Corresponding author
Schneiders, Julia A.
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
173-173
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163263397
Cited by
91
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (IRTG 1457)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
auditory working memory, working memory training, cross-modal transfer, n-back task, tonal sequences, right inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, middle frontal gyrus, frontoparietal network, neural efficiency, attentional control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review