Cited by 183Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

The first neurons of the human cerebral cortex

Bystron, Irina, Rakic, Pasko, Molnár, Zoltán, Blakemore, Colin·2006·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

We describe a distinctive, widespread population of neurons situated beneath the pial surface of the human embryonic forebrain even before complete closure of the neural tube. These 'predecessor' cells include the first neurons seen in the primordium of the cerebral cortex, before the onset of local neurogenesis. Morphological analysis, combined with the study of centrosome location, regional transcription factors and patterns of mitosis and neurogenesis, indicates that predecessor cells invade the cortical primordium by tangential migration from the subpallium. These neurons, described here for the first time, precede all other known cell types of the developing cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1726

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The developing human CNS has derived features including expanded proliferative zones and diverse neural stem/progenitor cell subtypes with enhanced proliferative capacity that facilitate brain expansion, especially neocortical expansion.

    “the developing human CNS possesses certain divergent and highly derived features, such as expanded proliferative zones and diverse subtypes of neural stem and progenitor cells with enhanced proliferative capacities that facilitate brain expansion, especially of the neocortex (Bae et al., 2015; Bystron et al., 2006; Dehay et al., 2015; Gulden and Sestan, 2014; Howard et al., 2008; Lui et al., 2011;”

    From The Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System (2016) · cites this paper as Bystron et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bystron, I., Rakic, P., Molnár, Z., & Blakemore, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Bystron, Irina
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2006-06-18
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
880-886
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1969413827
Cited by
183
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
cortical development, tangential migration, subpallium, transcription factors, mitosis, neurogenesis, neural tube closure
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Cell Movement, Cerebral Cortex, Fetus, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Stem Cells, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression, Body Patterning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review