Cited by 8,710Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy

Peer, Dan, Karp, Jeffrey M., Hong, Seungpyo, Farokhzad, Omid C., Margalit, Rimona, Langer, Robert·2007·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

Nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize cancer diagnosis and therapy. Advances in protein engineering and materials science have contributed to novel nanoscale targeting approaches that may bring new hope to cancer patients. Several therapeutic nanocarriers have been approved for clinical use. However, to date, there are only a few clinically approved nanocarriers that incorporate molecules to selectively bind and target cancer cells. This review examines some of the approved formulations and discusses the challenges in translating basic research to the clinic. We detail the arsenal of nanocarriers and molecules available for selective tumour targeting, and emphasize the challenges in cancer treatment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nnano.2007.387

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 106 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. James, J. S. & Dubs, G. FDA approves new kind of lymphoma treatment. AIDS Treat. News 284, 2–3 (1997).
  2. Kontermann, R. E. Immunolliposomes for cancer therapy. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 8, 39–45 (2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–126 of 126

Metadata

Authors
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O. C., Margalit, R., & Langer, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2007-12
Volume
2
Issue
12
Pages
751-760
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W2032760352
Cited by
8,710
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 315 · 2025: 354 · 2024: 357 · 2023: 383 · 2022: 454 · 2021: 563 · 2020: 618 · 2019: 607 · 2018: 686 · 2017: 677 · 2016: 659 · 2015: 664 · 2014: 600 · 2013: 536 · 2012: 453
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54ca119349-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 119349)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (K08EB003647, R01EB000244, EB003647)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
nanocarriers, cancer therapy, tumor targeting, targeted drug delivery, clinical translation, nanomedicine, cancer diagnosis
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Carriers, Drug Compounding, Neoplasms, Nanostructures, Nanomedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review