Cited by 75Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Amygdala-Hippocampal Connectivity Changes During Acute Psychosocial Stress: Joint Effect of Early Life Stress and Oxytocin

Open access
Fan, Yan, Pestke, Karin, Feeser, Melanie, Aust, Sabine, Pruessner, Jens C, Böker, Heinz, Bajbouj, Malek, Grimm, Simone·2015·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Previous evidence shows that acute stress changes both amygdala activity and its connectivity with a distributed brain network. Early life stress (ELS), especially emotional abuse (EA), is associated with altered reactivity to psychosocial stress in adulthood and moderates or even reverses the stress-attenuating effect of oxytocin (OXT). The neural underpinnings of the interaction between ELS and OXT remain unclear, though. Therefore, we here investigate the joint effect of ELS and OXT on transient changes in amygdala-centered functional connectivity induced by acute psychosocial stress, using a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, within-subject crossover design. Psychophysiological interaction analysis in the placebo session revealed stress-induced increases in functional connectivity between amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, putamen, caudate and thalamus. Regression analysis showed that EA was positively associated with stress-induced changes in connectivity between amygdala and hippocampus. Moreover, hierarchical linear regression showed that this positive association between EA and stress-induced amygdala-hippocampal connectivity was moderated after the administration of intranasal OXT. Amygdala-hippocampal connectivity in the OXT session correlated negatively with cortisol stress responses. Our findings suggest that altered amygdala-hippocampal functional connectivity during psychosocial stress may have a crucial role in the altered sensitivity to OXT effects in individuals who have experienced EA in their childhood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2015.123

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chronic stress causes alterations in the hippocampus including dendritic atrophy, synaptic spine loss, suppressed neurogenesis, and volumetric reductions, which impair hippocampal-dependent cognitive processes such as memory formation and emotional regulation.

    “These alterations include dendritic atrophy, synaptic spine loss, suppressed neurogenesis, and volumetric reductions, which collectively impair hippocampal-dependent cognitive processes such as memory formation and emotional regulation [86,87,88,89,90].”

    From Chronic Stress-Associated Depressive Disorders: The Impact of HPA Axis Dysregulation and Neuroinflammation on the Hippocampus—A Mini Review (2025) · cites this paper as [87]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [49]49. Wager TD, Barrett LF, Bliss-Moreau E, Lindquist KA, Duncan S, Kober H et al (2012)The neuroimaging of emotionIn:Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF(eds). Handbook of Emotions. The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, pp 249-271.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, Y., Pestke, K., Feeser, M., Aust, S., Pruessner, J. C., Böker, H., Bajbouj, M., & Grimm, S.
Affiliations
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Fan, Yan
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2015-04-29
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
2736-2744
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2006280192
Cited by
75
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
acute psychosocial stress, early life stress, emotional abuse, oxytocin, functional connectivity, cortisol stress response, medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, intranasal oxytocin
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Double-Blind Method, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Oxytocin, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Retrospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Linear Models, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review