Cited by 426Child Abuse and TraumaFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Childhood maltreatment is associated with altered fear circuitry and increased internalizing symptoms by late adolescence

Open access
Herringa, Ryan J., Birn, Rasmus M., Ruttle, Paula L., Burghy, Cory A., Stodola, Diane E., Davidson, Richard J., Essex, Marilyn J.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Childhood maltreatment is a major risk factor for internalizing disorders including depression and anxiety, which cause significant disability. Altered connectivity of the brain’s fear circuitry represents an important candidate mechanism linking maltreatment and these disorders, but this relationship has not been directly explored. Using resting-state functional brain connectivity in adolescents, we show that maltreatment predicts lower prefrontal–hippocampal connectivity in females and males but lower prefrontal–amygdala connectivity only in females. Altered connectivity, in turn, mediated the development of internalizing symptoms. These results highlight the importance of fronto–hippocampal connectivity for both sexes in internalizing symptoms following maltreatment. The additional impact on fronto–amygdala connectivity in females may help explain their higher risk for anxiety and depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1310766110

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Right amygdala structural alterations in adulthood are particularly linked to childhood maltreatment exposure.

    “Thus, right amygdala may be differentially responsive to negative or threatening stimuli (107–109), and alterations in structure (38, 109, 110) of the right amygdala in adulthood have been particularly related to exposure to childhood maltreatment.”
  • The mPFC and amygdala have extensive bidirectional connections and often function together.

    “Although mPFC and amygdala have extensive bidirectional connections and often function in tandem (110, 116, 117), these mPFC findings on greater left responding under conditions of deprived care are suggestive but have yet to be extended to amygdala structure or function.”
  • Recent work suggests that prefrontal-amygdalar functional connectivity can be influenced by early adversity.

    “Likewise, recent work suggests that prefrontal-amygdalar functional connectivity can be influenced by early adversity43-44.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]17. Garrett AS, et al. (2012) Brain activation to facial expressions in youth with PTSD symptoms. Depress Anxiety 29(5):449-459.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herringa, R. J., Birn, R. M., Ruttle, P. L., Burghy, C. A., Stodola, D. E., Davidson, R. J., & Essex, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-11-04
Volume
110
Issue
47
Pages
19119-19124
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2167216405
Cited by
426
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 1
FWCI
32.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  • National Institutes of Health (MH084051)
  • School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH052354, P50MH100031, R01MH044340, P50MH084051, K08MH100267)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD003352)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
child abuse, internalizing problems, fear circuitry, resting-state functional connectivity, amygdala, hippocampus, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, anxiety, depression, adolescence, sex differences, mediation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amygdala, Anxiety Disorders, Child Abuse, Depressive Disorder, Fear, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Wisconsin, Prefrontal Cortex, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review