Cited by 58Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Infections and Studies

Macrophage internalization creates a multidrug-tolerant fungal persister reservoir and facilitates the emergence of drug resistance

Open access
Arastehfar, Amir, Daneshnia, Farnaz, Cabrera, Nathaly, Penalva-Lopez, Suyapa, Sarathy, Jansy, Zimmerman, Matthew, Shor, Erika, Perlin, David S.·2023·Nature Communications

Abstract

Candida glabrata is a major fungal pathogen notable for causing recalcitrant infections, rapid emergence of drug-resistant strains, and its ability to survive and proliferate within macrophages. Resembling bacterial persisters, a subset of genetically drug-susceptible C. glabrata cells can survive lethal exposure to the fungicidal echinocandin drugs. Herein, we show that macrophage internalization induces cidal drug tolerance in C. glabrata, expanding the persister reservoir from which echinocandin-resistant mutants emerge. We show that this drug tolerance is associated with non-proliferation and is triggered by macrophage-induced oxidative stress, and that deletion of genes involved in reactive oxygen species detoxification significantly increases the emergence of echinocandin-resistant mutants. Finally, we show that the fungicidal drug amphotericin B can kill intracellular C. glabrata echinocandin persisters, reducing emergence of resistance. Our study supports the hypothesis that intra-macrophage C. glabrata is a reservoir of recalcitrant/drug-resistant infections, and that drug alternating strategies can be developed to eliminate this reservoir.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-36882-6

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • N. glabratus persisters are recalcitrant to echinocandins and AmB.

    “N. glabratus persisters are recalcitrant to echinocandins and AmB [38].”

    From Antifungal persistence: Clinical relevance and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results section reports that intracellular C. glabrata persisters are highly tolerant to echinocandins, supporting that part of the claim. But the section titled “Micafungin-tolerant ICG are effectively killed by amphotericin B” reports the opposite for AmB: following micafungin with amphotericin B significantly reduced persister numbers. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Echinocandins' cidality requires actively growing cells producing a cell wall, whereas amphotericin B indistinguishably kills growing and non-growing cells.

    “echinocandins’ cidality requires actively growing cells producing a cell wall, whereas amphotericin B indistinguishably kills growing and non-growing cells (36).”

    From Overlooked <i>Candida glabrata</i> petites are echinocandin tolerant, induce host inflammatory responses, and display poor <i>in vivo</i> fitness (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Discussion says echinocandin killing may be more dependent on growth because its target is needed for cell-wall building, while amphotericin B can act on growing and non-growing cells. The Results likewise find amphotericin B killing much less dependent on nutrient availability. These passages support the contrast, but not the categorical claims that echinocandins require growth or that amphotericin B kills the two states indistinguishably. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite initial susceptibility to drug, heteroresistant subpopulations can expand during therapy, partially due to antifungal exposure, characterized as emergence of resistance-related genetic mutations, and clinically as relapse or progression of infection.

    “Despite initial susceptibility to the drug, heteroresistant subpopulations can expand during therapy, partially due to antifungal exposure, characterized as the emergence of resistance-related genetic mutations, and clinically as relapse or progression of the infection [110,151,152,153].”

    From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [110]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Echinocandin resistance predominantly emerges under specific drug selection pressure, as evidenced by its strong association with prior echinocandin exposure.

    “Clinically, echinocandin resistance predominantly emerges under specific drug selection pressure, as evidenced by their strong association with prior echinocandin exposure [44, 45, 46].”

    From Calcineurin‐Dependent Stress Adaptation Enables Caspofungin Heteroresistance Leading to Stable Resistance in <i>Candida Glabrata</i> (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction (page not provided) reports that increased clinical use of echinocandins was accompanied by more resistant C. glabrata isolates, and that resistant isolates can emerge during infection. The paper does not establish that resistance predominantly arises under drug selection pressure or show a strong patient-level association with prior echinocandin exposure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Caspofungin stress itself can induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, which has been linked to decreased susceptibility and may act as a driver of lipid peroxidation.

    “caspofungin stress itself can induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation [54], which has been linked to decreased susceptibility and may act as a driver of lipid peroxidation”

    From Calcineurin‐Dependent Stress Adaptation Enables Caspofungin Heteroresistance Leading to Stable Resistance in <i>Candida Glabrata</i> (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Discussion reports that echinocandin treatment increased ROS in C. glabrata, supporting the general point, but it does not establish that caspofungin specifically caused the increase. The paper links ROS to greater tolerance of micafungin; it also says the authors found no evidence of ROS-based damage to lipids, so it does not support the proposed lipid-peroxidation link. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arastehfar, A., Daneshnia, F., Cabrera, N., Penalva-Lopez, S., Sarathy, J., Zimmerman, M., Shor, E., & Perlin, D. S.
Affiliations
Hackensack Meridian Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shor, Erika
  • Perlin, David S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-03-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1183-1183
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322760718
Cited by
58
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (5R01AI109025)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida glabrata, macrophage uptake, echinocandin resistance, drug tolerance, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species scavenging, amphotericin B, antifungal resistance, drug combination therapy
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Drug Resistance, Drug Tolerance, Macrophages, Candida glabrata, Echinocandins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review