CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing

Qiang, Xiaogang, Zhou, Xiaoqi, Wang, Jianwei, Wilkes, Callum M., Loke, Thomas, O’Gara, Sean, Kling, Laurent, Marshall, Graham D., Santagati, Raffaele, Ralph, Timothy C., Wang, Jingbo B., O’Brien, Jeremy L., Thompson, Mark G., Matthews, Jonathan C. F.·2018·Nature Photonics
DOI 10.1038/s41566-018-0236-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41566-018-0236-y

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • State-of-the-art integrated quantum photonic circuits based on SOI are capable of implementing quantum gates between two qubits and chip-to-chip teleportation.

    “State-of-the-art integrated quantum photonic circuits based on SOI are capable of implementing quantum gates between two qubits [16] and chip-to-chip teleportation [17]”

    From Ultrabright Entangled-Photon-Pair Generation from anAlGaAs-On-Insulator Microring Resonator (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

  • The on-chip generation, manipulation and measurement of four-photon four-qubit graph states was demonstrated in a Si-chip.

    “The on-chip GMM of four-photon four-qubit graph states was demonstrated in a Si-chip ( Fig. 4f ) [87].”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [87]

  • Four-photon four-qubit star- and line-graph states were generated, manipulated and measured in a Si-photonic chip, with four photons generated in 4 waveguide SFWM-SPSs and qubits operated on a reconfigurable entangling gate performing either a fusion operation or CZ operation.

    “fourphoton four-qubit star- and line-graph states are generated, manipulated and measured in a Si-photonic chip. Four photons are generated in 4 waveguide SFWMSPSs. Qubits are operated on a reconfigurable entangling gate, performing either a fusion operation or CZ operation.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Silverstone, J. W., Bonneau, D., O’Brien, J. L. & Thompson, M. G. Silicon quantum photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 390–402 (2016). · DOI
  2. O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vučković, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 3, 687–695 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Wilkes, C. M. et al. 60 dB high-extinction auto-configured Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Opt. Lett. 41, 5318–5321 (2016). · DOI
  4. Sun, J., Timurdogan, E., Yaacobi, A., Hosseini, E. S. & Watts, M. R. Large-scale nanophotonic phased array. Nature 493, 195–199 (2013). · DOI
  5. Harris, N. C. et al. Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor. Nat. Photon. 11, 447–452 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Long, G. L. General quantum interference principle and duality computer. Commun. Theor. Phys. 45, 825–844 (2006). · DOI
  7. Politi, A., Cryan, M. J., Rarity, J. G., Yu, S. & O’Brien, J. L. Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits. Science 320, 646–649 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Spring, J. B. et al. Boson sampling on a photonic chip. Science 339, 798–801 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Tillmann, M. et al. Experimental boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 7, 540–544 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wang, J. et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science 360, 285–291 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Sharping, J. E. et al. Generation of correlated photons in nanoscale silicon waveguides. Opt. Express 14, 12388–12393 (2006). · DOI
  12. Najafi, F. et al. On-chip detection of entangled photons by scalable integration of single-photon detectors. Nat. Commun. 6, 5873 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Song, C. et al. 10-qubit entanglement and parallel logic operations with a superconducting circuit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180511 (2017). · DOI
  14. Martn-López, E. et al. Experimental realization of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using qubit recycling. Nat. Photon. 6, 773–776 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wang, J. et al. Experimental quantum Hamiltonian learning. Nat. Phys. 13, 551–555 (2017). · DOI
  16. Santagati, R. et al. Silicon photonic processor of two-qubit entangling quantum logic. J. Opt. 19, 114006 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hanneke, D. et al. Realization of a programmable two-qubit quantum processor. Nat. Phys. 6, 13–16 (2010). · DOI
  18. Farhi, E., Goldstone, J. & Gutmann, S. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4028 (2014). · arXiv
  19. Farhi, E., Goldstone, J. & Gutmann, S. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm applied to a bounded occurrence constraint problem. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6062 (2014). · arXiv
  20. Szegedy, M. Spectra of quantized walks and a $$\sqrt {{\rm{\delta}}{\rm{\varepsilon}}}$$ δ ε rule. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0401053 (2004). · arXiv
  21. Szegedy, M. in Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 32–41 (IEEE, 2004).
  22. Childs, A. M. & Wiebe, N. Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations. Quantum Inform. Comput. 12, 901–924 (2012). · DOI
  23. Childs, A. M., Kothari, R. & Somma, R. D. Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision. SIAM J. Comput. 46, 1920–1950 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Patel, R. B., Ho, J., Ferreyrol, F., Ralph, T. C. & Pryde, G. J. A quantum Fredkin gate. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501531 (2016). · DOI
  25. Wei, S. J., Ruan, D. & Long, G. L. Duality quantum algorithm efficiently simulates open quantum systems. Sci. Rep. 6, 30727 (2016). · DOI
  26. Qiang, X., Zhou, X., Aungskunsiri, K., Cable, H. & O’Brien, J. L. Quantum processing by remote quantum control. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 045002 (2017). · DOI
  27. Silverstone, J. W. et al. On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources. Nat. Photon. 8, 104–108 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Okamoto, R. et al. An entanglement filter. Science 323, 483–485 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Childs, A. M. & Goldstone, J. Spatial search by quantum walk. Phys. Rev. A 70, 022314 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Paparo, G. D., Müller, M., Comellas, F. & Martin-Delgado, M. A. Quantum Google in a complex network. Sci. Rep. 3, 2773 (2013). · DOI
  32. Loke, T., Tang, J. W., Rodriguez, J., Small, M. & Wang, J. B. Comparing classical and quantum pageranks. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 25 (2017). · DOI
  33. Chiang, C.-F., Nagaj, D. & Wocjan, P. Efficient circuits for quantum walks. Quantum Inform. Comput. 10, 420–434 (2010). · DOI
  34. Loke, T. & Wang, J. B. Efficient quantum circuits for Szegedy quantum walks. Ann. Phys. 382, 64–84 (2017). · DOI
  35. Highchi, Y., Konno, N., Sato, I. & Segawa, E. Periodicity of the discrete-time quantum walk on a finite graph. Interdiscip. Inform. Sci. 23, 75–86 (2017).
  36. Collins, M. J. et al. Integrated spatial multiplexing of heralded single-photon sources. Nat. Commun. 4, 2582 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Khasminskaya, S. et al. Fully integrated quantum photonic circuit with an electrically driven light source. Nat. Photon. 10, 727–732 (2016). · DOI
  38. Gimeno-Segovia, M., Shadbolt, P. J., Browne, D. E. & Ruddolph, T. From three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states to ballistic universal quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020502 (2015). · DOI
  39. Qiang, X. et al. Underpinning data for ‘Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing.’ https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.1gbf7bpuazruz26cxh0tc0q9zq (2018). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Qiang, X., Zhou, X., Wang, J., Wilkes, C. M., Loke, T., O’Gara, S., Kling, L., Marshall, G. D., Santagati, R., Ralph, T. C., Wang, J. B., O’Brien, J. L., Thompson, M. G., & Matthews, J. C. F.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Photonics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-08-20
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
534-539
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
DOI
10.1038/s41566-018-0236-y
Cited by
516
References
17
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review