Cited by 768Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

A lymphocyte–microglia–astrocyte axis in chronic active multiple sclerosis

Open access
Absinta, Martina, Maric, Dragan, Gharagozloo, Marjan, Garton, Thomas, Smith, Matthew D., Jin, Jing, Fitzgerald, Kathryn C., Song, Anya +8 more·2021·Nature

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions that do not resolve in the months after they form harbour ongoing demyelination and axon degeneration, and are identifiable in vivo by their paramagnetic rims on MRI scans 1-3. Here, to define mechanisms underlying this disabling, progressive neurodegenerative state 4-6 and foster development of new therapeutic agents, we used MRI-informed single-nucleus RNA sequencing to profile the edge of demyelinated white matter lesions at various stages of inflammation. We uncovered notable glial and immune cell diversity, especially at the chronically inflamed lesion edge. We define 'microglia inflamed in MS' (MIMS) and 'astrocytes inflamed in MS', glial phenotypes that demonstrate neurodegenerative programming. The MIMS transcriptional profile overlaps with that of microglia in other neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting that primary and secondary neurodegeneration share common mechanisms and could benefit from similar therapeutic approaches. We identify complement component 1q (C1q) as a critical mediator of MIMS activation, validated immunohistochemically in MS tissue, genetically by microglia-specific C1q ablation in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and therapeutically by treating chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with C1q blockade. C1q inhibition is a potential therapeutic avenue to address chronic white matter inflammation, which could be monitored by longitudinal assessment of its dynamic biomarker, paramagnetic rim lesions, using advanced MRI methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-021-03892-7

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These prioritized genes were differentially expressed in MS brain lesion types relative to control white matter.

    “These prioritized genes were differentially expressed in MS brain lesion types relative to control white matter26,27 (Supplementary Note, Supplementary Fig. 6).”

    From Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The section “MIMS and AIMS at the chronic active lesion edge” reports genes differentially expressed at that edge relative to control white matter. Extended Data Fig. 9 also maps a list of prioritized MS susceptibility genes, but does not establish that the citing document’s prioritized genes were differentially expressed across MS lesion types. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microglia are a salient feature of white and gray matter lesions, representing a major part of ongoing compartmentalized inflammation induced by an initial inflammatory attack.

    “Microglia are a salient feature of white and gray matter lesions, representing a major part of ongoing compartmentalized inflammation induced by an initial inflammatory attack (Absinta et al. 2021).”

    From Depletion of Microglia Increases Cortical Oligodendrocyte Density During Remyelination (2026) · cites this paper as Absinta et al. 2021

    The ‘MIMS and AIMS at the chronic active lesion edge’ section identifies inflamed microglia as a substantial immune-cell population in chronic active white-matter lesions, and Extended Data Fig. 4 describes frequent activated microglia at the lesion edge (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not establish the same finding for gray-matter lesions or show that the ongoing inflammation was induced by an initial inflammatory attack. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Significantly higher expression of immunoglobulin receptors and complement components and their receptors in lesions with foamy microglia indicates increased immunoglobulin-mediated phagocytosis.

    “In addition, we observed significantly higher expression of immunoglobulin receptors and complement components and their receptors in lesions with foamy microglia (Supplementary Fig. 6), indicating increased immunoglobulin-mediated phagocytosis11.”

    From Foamy microglia link oxylipins to disease progression in multiple sclerosis (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    In “MIMS and AIMS at the chronic active lesion edge” (page not available), the paper links MIMS-foamy to myelin phagocytosis, but does not identify it as immunoglobulin-mediated. It reports elevated Fc-gamma receptors and complement components in MIMS-iron, with higher complement C1-complex expression than MIMS-foamy. The citing authors’ expression comparison is their own observation; the source does not establish the proposed mechanism for their foamy-microglia lesions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reclustering of microglia in the Absinta et al. dataset revealed three microglia clusters across five different MS conditions.

    “Reclustering of microglia revealed three microglia clusters across five different MS conditions (Fig. 4 E and F and Dataset S7).”

    From Acute TREM2 inhibition depletes MAFB-high microglia and hinders remyelination (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract describes subclustering of the dataset, and the section ‘MIMS and AIMS at the chronic active lesion edge’ identifies two inflamed microglial subclusters alongside homeostatic microglia. However, the five sampled tissue settings include normal white matter from neurologically healthy controls, so the source does not support calling all five ‘MS conditions.’ The citing paper’s reclustering is its own analysis, not a result reported by Absinta et al. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the Absinta et al. dataset, microglial cluster 0 exhibited elevated MAFB expression alongside concurrent expression of microglial markers of activation, including APOE, GPNMB, BHLHE40, and C1QC.

    “Among these, cluster 0 exhibited elevated MAFB expression (Fig. 4 G and H) alongside the concurrent expression of microglial markers of activation, including APOE, GPNMB, BHLHE40, and C1QC (Dataset S7).”

    From Acute TREM2 inhibition depletes MAFB-high microglia and hinders remyelination (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    The ‘MIMS and AIMS at the chronic active lesion edge’ section lists APOE in an inflamed microglial cluster, and ‘C1q critically mediates microglia activation’ says C1QC is expressed mainly by MIMS (page numbers unavailable). Our copy does not establish elevated MAFB in cluster 0 or concurrent expression there of APOE, GPNMB, BHLHE40, and C1QC; searches for those genes and cluster 0 did not resolve that specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [2]Absinta M, Persistent 7-tesla phase rim predicts poor outcome in new multiple sclerosis patient lesions. J Clin Invest 126, 2597– 2609 (2016). 27270171 PMC4922708
  2. [4]Absinta M, Association of Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions With Disability In Vivo. JAMA Neurol 76, 1520 (2019). PMC6692692 31403674
  3. [5]Elliott C, Chronic white matter lesion activity predicts clinical progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 142, 2787– 2799 (2019). 31497864 PMC6736181
  4. [6]Maggi P, Chronic white matter inflammation and neurofilament levels in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology (2021). PMC8424501 34088875
  5. [8]Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF & Calabresi PA Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med 378, 169– 180 (2018). 29320652 PMC6942519
  6. [9]Krishnaswami SR, Using single nuclei for RNA-seq to capture the transcriptome of postmortem neurons. Nat Protoc 11, 499– 524 (2016). 26890679 PMC4941947
  7. [11]Elkjaer ML, Molecular signature of different lesion types in the brain white matter of patients with progressive multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7, 205 (2019). 31829262 PMC6907342
  8. [12]Jackle K, Molecular signature of slowly expanding lesions in progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 143, 2073– 2088 (2020). 32577755
  9. [14]Maric D, Whole-brain tissue mapping toolkit using large-scale highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging and deep neural networks. Nat Commun 12, 1550 (2021). 33692351 PMC7946933
  10. [15]Comabella M, Montalban X, Munz C & Lunemann JD Targeting dendritic cells to treat multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 6, 499– 507 (2010). 20717105
  11. [16]Clayton BLL & Popko B Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in disorders of myelinating glia. Brain Res 1648, 594– 602 (2016). 27055915 PMC5036997
  12. [20]Sankowski R, Mapping microglia states in the human brain through the integration of high-dimensional techniques. Nat Neurosci 22, 2098– 2110 (2019). 31740814
  13. [21]Jakel S, Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 566, 543– 547 (2019). 30747918 PMC6544546
  14. [24]Breij EC, Homogeneity of active demyelinating lesions in established multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 63, 16– 25 (2008). 18232012
  15. [25]van der Poel M, Hoepel W, Hamann J, Huitinga I & Dunnen JD IgG Immune Complexes Break Immune Tolerance of Human Microglia. J Immunol 205, 2511– 2518 (2020). 32967931
  16. [26]Browaeys R, Saelens W & Saeys Y NicheNet: modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nat Methods 17, 159– 162 (2020). 31819264
  17. [27]Rusinova I, Interferome v2.0: an updated database of annotated interferon-regulated genes. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D1040– 1046 (2013). 23203888 PMC3531205
  18. [31]Zhang B & Horvath S A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 4, Article17 (2005). 16646834
  19. [32]Dal-Bianco A, Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis iron rim lesions in 7 T MRI. Brain 144, 833– 847 (2021). 33484118
  20. [34]Fitzgerald KC, Early complement genes are associated with visual system degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Brain 142, 2722– 2736 (2019). 31289819 PMC6776113
  21. [35]Kaiser T & Feng G Tmem119-EGFP and Tmem119-CreERT2 Transgenic Mice for Labeling and Manipulating Microglia. eNeuro 6(2019). PMC6712208 31371457
  22. [36]Werneburg S, Targeted Complement Inhibition at Synapses Prevents Microglial Synaptic Engulfment and Synapse Loss in Demyelinating Disease. Immunity 52, 167– 182 e167 (2020). 31883839 PMC6996144
  23. [37]Fonseca MI, Cell-specific deletion of C1qa identifies microglia as the dominant source of C1q in mouse brain. J Neuroinflammation 14, 48 (2017). 28264694 PMC5340039
  24. [39]Michailidou I, Complement C1q-C3-associated synaptic changes in multiple sclerosis hippocampus. Ann Neurol 77, 1007– 1026 (2015). 25727254
  25. [40]van der Valk P & De Groot CJ Staging of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions: pathology of the time frame of MS. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 26, 2– 10 (2000). 10736062
  26. [41]Matson KJE, Isolation of Adult Spinal Cord Nuclei for Massively Parallel Single-nucleus RNA Sequencing. J Vis Exp (2018). PMC6235529 30371670
  27. [43]Stuart T, Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell 177, 1888– 1902 e1821 (2019). 31178118 PMC6687398
  28. [44]Korsunsky I, Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat Methods 16, 1289– 1296 (2019). 31740819 PMC6884693
  29. [45]Fabregat A, The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46, D649– D655 (2018). 29145629 PMC5753187
  30. [46]Raudvere U, g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res 47, W191– W198 (2019). 31066453 PMC6602461
  31. [47]Zhou Y, Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat Commun 10, 1523 (2019). 30944313 PMC6447622
  32. [49]Krzywinski M, Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res 19, 1639– 1645 (2009). 19541911 PMC2752132
  33. [51]Absinta M, Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging to guide the pathologic cut: individualized, 3-dimensionally printed cutting boxes for fixed brains. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 73, 780– 788 (2014). 25007244 PMC4144036
  34. [53]Absinta M, Identification of Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 3T MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39, 1233– 1238 (2018). 29724768 PMC6039266
  35. [54]Yao B, Chronic multiple sclerosis lesions: characterization with high-field-strength MR imaging. Radiology 262, 206– 215 (2012). 22084205 PMC3244667
  36. [55]Sati P, Rapid, high-resolution, whole-brain, susceptibility-based MRI of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 20, 1464– 1470 (2014). 24639479 PMC4167170

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Absinta, M., Maric, D., Gharagozloo, M., Garton, T., Smith, M. D., Jin, J., Fitzgerald, K. C., Song, A., Liu, P., Lin, J.-P., Wu, T., Johnson, K. R., McGavern, D. B., Schafer, D. P., Calabresi, P. A., & Reich, D. S.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
  • Absinta, Martina
  • Reich, Daniel S.
Venue
Nature
Published
2021-09-08
Volume
597
Issue
7878
Pages
709-714
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3197136220
Cited by
768
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 139 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 192 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 1
FWCI
77.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (ZIA NS003148)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG068281)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM136577)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R35NS097303, R01NS117533, ZIANS003119, R01NS041435, R01NS082347)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
microglia, astrocytes, lymphocytes, demyelination, white matter lesions, paramagnetic rim lesions, neurodegeneration, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, glial phenotype, microglial activation, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
RNA-Seq, Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Lymphocytes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Complement C1q, Microglia, Mice, Transcriptome, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review