Cited by 966Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene expression and cancer classification

High-Spatial-Resolution Multi-Omics Sequencing via Deterministic Barcoding in Tissue

Open access
Liu, Yang, Yang, Mingyu, Deng, Yanxiang, Su, Graham, Enninful, Archibald, Guo, Cindy C., Tebaldi, Toma, Zhang, Di +8 more·2020·Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We present deterministic barcoding in tissue for spatial omics sequencing (DBiT-seq) for co-mapping of mRNAs and proteins in a formaldehyde-fixed tissue slide via next-generation sequencing (NGS). Parallel microfluidic channels were used to deliver DNA barcodes to the surface of a tissue slide, and crossflow of two sets of barcodes, A1-50 and B1-50, followed by ligation in situ, yielded a 2D mosaic of tissue pixels, each containing a unique full barcode AB. Application to mouse embryos revealed major tissue types in early organogenesis as well as fine features like microvasculature in a brain and pigmented epithelium in an eye field. Gene expression profiles in 10-μm pixels conformed into the clusters of single-cell transcriptomes, allowing for rapid identification of cell types and spatial distributions. DBiT-seq can be adopted by researchers with no experience in microfluidics and may find applications in a range of fields including developmental biology, cancer biology, neuroscience, and clinical pathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.026

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBiT-seq enables simultaneous detection of the whole transcriptome and 22 proteins.

    “developing the first spatial multi-omics technology, deterministic barcoding in tissue for spatial omics sequencing (DBiT-seq), enabling simultaneous detection of the whole transcriptome and 22 proteins [85].”
  • DBiT-seq is an unbiased multiomic approach that allows for spatial barcoding of the transcriptome in tissues.

    “DBiT-seq is an unbiased multiomic approach that allows for spatial barcoding of the transcriptome in tissues57.”
  • KRT17 functions as a tumor promoter and regulates proliferation in pancreatic cancer, and MMP11 has been found to be a prognostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer.

    “KRT17 functions as a tumor promoter and regulates proliferation in pancreatic cancer 21 , and MMP11 has been found to be a prognostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer 22 .”

    From SpaGCN: Integrating gene expression, spatial location and histology to identify spatial domains and spatially variable genes by graph convolutional network (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results sections on whole mouse embryos and internal-organ development discuss spatial gene-expression mapping, not pancreatic cancer. Searches for KRT17 as a tumor promoter and MMP11 as a prognostic biomarker found no passage addressing either claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DBiT-seq was the first reported spatial multi-omics technology to co-map tens of proteins and whole transcriptome.

    “DBiT-seq was the first reported spatial multi-omics technology that demonstrated co-mapping of tens of proteins and with a whole transcriptome, and this method has further expanded to spatial epigenomics profiling of chromatin accessibility124 and histone modification125.”
  • Paired experimental methods are easier computationally because modalities can be tethered to a single cell or spot, but sequencing capacity of each modality decreases overall sample size.

    “By contrast, paired experimental methods (10x Multiome, SHARE-seq60, DBiT-seq123, SNARE-seq57, CITE-seq68 and others) are easier to work with computationally as different modalities can be tethered to a single cell or a single spot; however, the sequencing capacity of each modality causes the overall sample size to decrease.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Svensson V, Teichmann SA, and Stegle O (2018b). SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes. Nature Methods 15, 343. 29553579 PMC6350895

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Yang, M., Deng, Y., Su, G., Enninful, A., Guo, C. C., Tebaldi, T., Zhang, D., Kim, D., Bai, Z., Norris, E., Pan, A., Li, J., Xiao, Y., Halene, S., & Fan, R.
Affiliations
  • Yale Cancer Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Rong
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
183
Issue
6
Pages
1665-1681.e18
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3100967665
Cited by
966
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 208 · 2025: 200 · 2024: 181 · 2023: 154 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
30.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Stand Up To Cancer
  • National Institutes of Health
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
spatial omics, mouse embryo development, organogenesis, microcirculation, pigmented epithelium, cell type annotation, spatial gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Automation, Brain, Embryo, Mammalian, Eye, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Organ Specificity, RNA, Messenger, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis, DNA, Complementary, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Genomics, Microfluidics, DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review