Cited by 115Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Spatial and single-nucleus transcriptomic analysis of genetic and sporadic forms of Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Miyoshi, Emily, Morabito, Samuel, Henningfield, Caden M., Das, Sudeshna, Rahimzadeh, Negin, Shabestari, Sepideh Kiani, Michael, Neethu, Emerson, Nora +19 more·2024·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) depends on environmental and heritable factors, with remarkable differences evident between individuals at the molecular level. Here we present a transcriptomic survey of AD using spatial transcriptomics (ST) and single-nucleus RNA-seq in cortical samples from early-stage AD, late-stage AD, and AD in Down Syndrome (AD in DS) donors. Studying AD in DS provides an opportunity to enhance our understanding of the AD transcriptome, potentially bridging the gap between genetic mouse models and sporadic AD. Our analysis revealed spatial and cell-type specific changes in disease, with broad similarities in these changes between sAD and AD in DS. We performed additional ST experiments in a disease timecourse of 5xFAD and wildtype mice to facilitate cross-species comparisons. Finally, amyloid plaque and fibril imaging in the same tissue samples used for ST enabled us to directly link changes in gene expression with accumulation and spread of pathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-024-01961-x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different pathological features may generate distinct glial niches, including plaque-associated microglial and astrocytic responses.

    “Recent spatial and single-nucleus studies have emphasized that different pathological features may generate distinct glial niches, including plaque-associated microglial and astrocytic responses [57,58].”

    From Lymphoid-like Suppressive Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease: A New Neuroimmune Regulatory Axis? (2026) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Results sections on conformation-specific amyloid signatures and imaging mass cytometry report distinct plaque- and fibril-associated gene signatures, as well as changes in microglia and astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease (page unavailable). They do not establish that different pathological features generate distinct glial niches or directly identify both glial responses as plaque-associated. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent transcriptomic studies have demonstrated changes in the inhibitory-to-excitatory neuronal ratio and microglial cell states in the brain of people with DS.

    “Recent transcriptomic studies have begun to address this by systematically interrogating how the extra copy of Hsa21 alters transcript expression within the brain of people with DS, demonstrating changes in the inhibitory-to-excitatory neuronal ratio, and microglial cell states [49, 51].”

    From Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome–Alzheimer’s disease (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Results section (“ST and cellular transcriptomics of AD”; page not provided) reports shifts in cell-state composition, especially among microglia, in samples from people with Down syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease (DSAD). It identifies excitatory and inhibitory neurons but does not report a change in their ratio. The study also examined DSAD, not Down syndrome without Alzheimer’s disease. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Re-analysis of a previously published snRNAseq dataset showed upregulated expression of APOE in astrocytes in DSAD compared to healthy controls.

    “In support of these data, re-analysis of a previously published snRNAseq dataset showed the upregulated expression of APOE in astrocytes in DSAD compared to healthy controls [49].”

    From Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome–Alzheimer’s disease (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Methods (Differential gene expression analysis; page unavailable) report a DSAD-versus-control snRNA-seq comparison, but say it used a dataset generated in this study; the re-analysis of previously published datasets compared late-stage AD with controls. No passage found reports APOE upregulation in DSAD astrocytes (searched: APOE and APOE astrocytes DSAD). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • APP transcription is elevated in many cell types in the brains of people with DSAD, including cell types in which APOE expression is also raised.

    “Consistent with previous reports [49, 51], we observe that APP transcription is elevated in many cell types in the brains of people with DSAD, including cell types in which we find APOE expression is also raised.”

    From Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome–Alzheimer’s disease (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Results section, “Regional and cell-type-specific gene expression changes” (page unavailable), reports that APP is upregulated in DSAD samples, while noting that its expression is not significantly different from controls in one spatial cluster. It does not establish that APP is elevated in many cell types specifically. The APOE finding is phrased as the citing authors’ own observation, not as a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. [4]Bandler, R. C. et al. Single-cell delineation of lineage and genetic identity in the mouse brain. Nature 601, 404–409 (2022). 34912118 PMC8770128 · DOI
  2. [5]Bakken, T. E. et al. Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse. Nature 598, 111–119 (2021). 34616062 PMC8494640 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [6]BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN). et al.A multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex. Nature 598, 86–102 (2021). 34616075 PMC8494634 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [7]Morabito, S. et al. Single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and transcriptomic characterization of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 53, 1143–1155 (2021). 34239132 PMC8766217 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [8]Mathys, H. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 570, 332–337 (2019). 31042697 PMC6865822 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Zhou, Y. et al. Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 26, 131–142 (2020). 31932797 PMC6980793 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [10]Lau, S.-F., Cao, H., Fu, A. K. Y. & Ip, N. Y. Single-nucleus transcriptome analysis reveals dysregulation of angiogenic endothelial cells and neuroprotective glia in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25800–25809 (2020). 32989152 PMC7568283 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [11]Leng, K. et al. Molecular characterization of selectively vulnerable neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 276–287 (2021). 33432193 PMC7854528 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [13]Murdock, M. H. & Tsai, L.-H. Insights into Alzheimer’s disease from single-cell genomic approaches. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 181–195 (2023). 36593328 PMC10155598 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [14]McCarron, M. et al. A prospective 20 year longitudinal follow up of dementia in persons with Down syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 61, 843–852 (2017). 28664561 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [15]Martini, A. C., Gross, T. J., Head, E. & Mapstone, M. Beyond amyloid: immune, cerebrovascular, and metabolic contributions to Alzheimer disease in people with Down syndrome. Neuron 110, 2063–2079 (2022). 35472307 PMC9262826 · DOI
  12. [16]Fortea, J. et al. Clinical and biomarker changes of Alzheimer’s disease in adults with Down syndrome: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 395, 1988–1997 (2020). 32593336 PMC7322523 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [19]Habib, N. et al. Disease-associated astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease and aging. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 701–706 (2020). 32341542 PMC9262034 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [20]Swarup, V. et al. Identification of evolutionarily conserved gene networks mediating neurodegenerative dementia. Nat. Med. 25, 152–164 (2019). 30510257 PMC6602064 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [22]Zhao, E. et al. Spatial transcriptomics at subspot resolution with BayesSpace. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1375–1384 (2021). 34083791 PMC8763026 · DOI
  16. [23]Rosenberg, A. B. et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360, 176–182 (2018). 29545511 PMC7643870 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [24]Minoshima, S. et al. Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 42, 85–94 (1997). 9225689 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [27]Yang, A. C. et al. A human brain vascular atlas reveals diverse mediators of Alzheimer’s risk. Nature 603, 885–892 (2022). 35165441 PMC9635042 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [28]Dann, E., Henderson, N. C., Teichmann, S. A., Morgan, M. D. & Marioni, J. C. Differential abundance testing on single-cell data using k-nearest neighbor graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 245–253 (2022). 34594043 PMC7617075 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [31]Willumsen, N. et al. Variability in the type and layer distribution of cortical Aβ pathology in familial Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol. 32, e13009 (2022). 34319632 PMC9048809 · DOI
  21. [34]Zhang, M. J. et al. Polygenic enrichment distinguishes disease associations of individual cells in single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Genet. 54, 1572–1580 (2022). 36050550 PMC9891382 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [35]Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC). et al.Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019). 30820047 PMC6463297 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [37]Jansen, I. E. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat. Genet. 51, 404–413 (2019). 30617256 PMC6836675 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [39]Eissman, J. M. et al. Sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive resilience to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 145, 2541–2554 (2022). 35552371 PMC9337804 · DOI
  25. [40]Irvine, K., Laws, K. R., Gale, T. M. & Kondel, T. K. Greater cognitive deterioration in women than men with Alzheimer’s disease: a meta analysis. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 34, 989–998 (2012). 22913619 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [41]Gale, S. D., Baxter, L. & Thompson, J. Greater memory impairment in dementing females than males relative to sex-matched healthy controls. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 38, 527–533 (2016). 26735615 PMC4967933 · DOI
  27. [42]Hollingworth, P. et al. Four components describe behavioral symptoms in 1,120 individuals with late onset Alzheimer’s disease. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 54, 1348–1354 (2006). 16970641 · DOI
  28. [43]Park, J.-C. et al. Sex differences in the progression of glucose metabolism dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 55, 1023–1032 (2023). 37121979 PMC10238450 · DOI
  29. [44]Johnson, E. C. B. et al. Large-scale deep multi-layer analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease-related changes not observed at the RNA level. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 213–225 (2022). 35115731 PMC8825285 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [45]Wei, R. et al. Spatial charting of single-cell transcriptomes in tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1190–1199 (2022). 35314812 PMC9673606 · DOI
  31. [46]Jin, S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell–cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun. 12, 1088 (2021). 33597522 PMC7889871 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [47]Mizutani, K., Miyata, M., Shiotani, H., Kameyama, T. & Takai, Y. Nectins and Nectin-like molecules in synapse formation and involvement in neurological diseases. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 115, 103653 (2021). 34242750 · DOI
  33. [48]Mizutani, K., Miyata, M., Shiotani, H., Kameyama, T. & Takai, Y. Nectin-2 in general and in the brain. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 477, 167–180 (2022). 34633611 · DOI
  34. [49]Tomorsky, J., Parker, P. R. L., Doe, C. Q. & Niell, C. M. Precise levels of Nectin-3 are required for proper synapse formation in postnatal visual cortex. Neural Dev. 15, 13 (2020). 33160402 PMC7648993 · DOI
  35. [50]Nazarian, A., Yashin, A. I. & Kulminski, A. M. Genome-wide analysis of genetic predisposition to Alzheimer’s disease and related sex disparities. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 11, 5 (2019). 30636644 PMC6330399 · DOI
  36. [51]Sun, Y. et al. A transcriptome-wide association study of Alzheimer’s disease using prediction models of relevant tissues identifies novel candidate susceptibility genes. Genome Med. 13, 141 (2021). 34470669 PMC8408990 · DOI
  37. [52]Chakraborty, A. et al. Angiopoietin like-4 as a novel vascular mediator in capillary cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain 141, 3377–3388 (2018). 30462206 · DOI
  38. [54]Kenigsbuch, M. et al. A shared disease-associated oligodendrocyte signature among multiple CNS pathologies. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 876–886 (2022). 35760863 PMC9724210 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [55]Prasher, V. P. et al. Significant effect of APOE epsilon 4 genotype on the risk of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease and mortality in persons with Down syndrome. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 23, 1134–1140 (2008). 18464295 PMC2714805 · DOI
  40. [56]Lee, J. H. et al. Candidate gene analysis for Alzheimer’s disease in adults with Down syndrome. Neurobiol. Aging 56, 150–158 (2017). 28554490 PMC5603247 · DOI
  41. [58]Traag, V. A., Waltman, L. & Eck, N. J. V. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci. Rep. 9, 5233 (2019). 30914743 PMC6435756 · DOI · Paper page
  42. [59]Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015). 26653891 PMC4676162 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [60]Fleming, S. J. et al. Unsupervised removal of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments using CellBender. Nat. Methods 20, 1323–1335 (2023). 37550580 · DOI · Paper page
  44. [66]Melsted, P. et al. Modular, efficient and constant-memory single-cell RNA-seq preprocessing. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 813–818 (2021). 33795888 · DOI
  45. [67]Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019). 31740819 PMC6884693 · DOI · Paper page
  46. [71]Langfelder, P., Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R. Bioinformatics 24, 719–720 (2007). 18024473 · DOI · Paper page
  47. [72]Hartl, C. L. et al. Coexpression network architecture reveals the brain-wide and multiregional basis of disease susceptibility. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1313–1323 (2021). 34294919 PMC10263365 · DOI
  48. [73]Conway, J. R., Lex, A. & Gehlenborg, N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 33, 2938–2940 (2017). 28645171 PMC5870712 · DOI · Paper page
  49. [75]Dimitrov, D. et al. Comparison of methods and resources for cell–cell communication inference from single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Commun. 13, 3224 (2022). 35680885 PMC9184522 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [76]Moses, L. et al. Voyager: exploratory single-cell genomics data analysis with geospatial statistics. Preprint at bioRxiv 10.1101/2023.07.20.549945 (2023). · DOI
  51. [77]Getis, A. & Ord, J. K. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24, 189–206 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
  52. [78]Ord, J. K. & Getis, A. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr. Anal. 27, 286–306 (1995). · DOI
  53. [79]Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566, 496–502 (2019). 30787437 PMC6434952 · DOI · Paper page
  54. [81]Demontis, D. et al. Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nat. Genet. 51, 63–75 (2019). 30478444 PMC6481311 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [82]Consortium, G. et al. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat. Genet. 50, 381–389 (2018). 29483656 PMC5918692 · DOI · Paper page
  56. [83]de Lange, K. M. et al. Genome-wide association study implicates immune activation of multiple integrin genes in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 256–261 (2017). 28067908 PMC5289481 · DOI · Paper page
  57. [85]Liu, M. et al. Association studies of up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use. Nat. Genet. 51, 237–244 (2019). 30643251 PMC6358542 · DOI · Paper page
  58. [86]Linnér, R. K. et al. Genome-wide association analyses of risk tolerance and risky behaviors in over 1 million individuals identify hundreds of loci and shared genetic influences. Nat. Genet. 51, 245–257 (2019). 30643258 PMC6713272 · DOI · Paper page
  59. [88]Davies, G. et al. Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function. Nat. Commun. 9, 2098 (2018). 29844566 PMC5974083 · DOI
  60. [89]Dashti, H. S. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies genetic loci for self-reported habitual sleep duration supported by accelerometer-derived estimates. Nat. Commun. 10, 1100 (2019). 30846698 PMC6405943 · DOI
  61. [90]Nagel, M. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nat. Genet. 50, 920–927 (2018). 29942085 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyoshi, E., Morabito, S., Henningfield, C. M., Das, S., Rahimzadeh, N., Shabestari, S. K., Michael, N., Emerson, N., Reese, F., Shi, Z., Cao, Z., Srinivasan, S. S., Scarfone, V. M., Arreola, M. A., Lu, J., Wright, S., Silva, J., Leavy, K., Lott, I. T., Doran, E., Yong, W. H., Shahin, S., Perez-Rosendahl, M., Alzheimer’s Biomarkers Consortium–Down Syndrome (ABC–DS), Head, E., Green, K. N., & Swarup, V.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Swarup, Vivek
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2024-11-22
Volume
56
Issue
12
Pages
2704-2717
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W4404613107
Cited by
115
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
32.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001414, 5f31ag076308-02, UL1TR001873, UL1TR001857, UL1TR002373, UL1TR002345)
  • National Institute on Aging (F31 AG076308, P50AG005133, U01AG051406, U01AG051412, P50AG008702, P50AG005681, RF1AG071683, R01AG071683, U19AG068054, P30AG066444, T32AG000096, U54AG054349, P30AG062715, U24AG021886, P30AG062421, P30AG066519)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA053826)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM136624)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS084974, R01NS135556)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD090256, U54HD087011, P50HD105353)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, spatial transcriptomics, single-nucleus transcriptomics, cortical layers, glial inflammation, amyloid, genetic risk, intercellular communication, cross-species transcriptomics, sporadic Alzheimer's disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review