Cited by 39Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Minimal memory for details in real life events

Open access
Misra, Pranav, Marconi, Alyssa, Peterson, Matthew, Kreiman, Gabriel·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The extent to which the details of past experiences are retained or forgotten remains controversial. Some studies suggest massive storage while others describe memories as fallible summary recreations of original events. The discrepancy can be ascribed to the content of memories and how memories are evaluated. Many studies have focused on recalling lists of words/pictures, which lack the critical ingredients of real world memories. Here we quantified the ability to remember details about one hour of real life. We recorded video and eye movements while subjects walked along specified routes and evaluated whether they could distinguish video clips from their own experience from foils. Subjects were minimally above chance in remembering the minutiae of their experiences. Recognition of specific events could be partly explained by a machine-learning model of video contents. These results quantify recognition memory for events in real life and show that the details of everyday experience are largely not retained in memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-33792-2

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If people retain as few details about experiences as suggested by Misra et al. (2018), then remembered past events involve some degree of imagination, such as filling in missing details with internally generated content.

    “If people actually retain as few details about their experiences as suggested by the results of a recent study (Misra, Marconi, Peterson, & Kreiman, 2018), then it is not surprising that remembered past events involve some degee of imagination, such as filling in missing details with internallygenerated content including details from related experiences, conceptual information fleshing out aspects”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Misra, Marconi, Peterson, & Kreiman, 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]Conway, M. A. Autobiographical memory: An introduction. (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990).
  2. [30]Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. In NIPS (Montreal, 2012).
  3. [35]Isola, P., Parikh, D., Torralba, A. & Oliva, A. In NIPS (Montreal, 2011).
  4. [44]Tulving, E. Concepts of memory. (Oxford University Press, 1991).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Misra, P., Marconi, A., Peterson, M., & Kreiman, G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kreiman, Gabriel
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-11-12
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
16701-16701
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900083963
Cited by
39
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
recognition memory, event memory, everyday experience, memory retention, memory assessment
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adolescent, Adult, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review