Cited by 119Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Modifying Memory: Selectively Enhancing and Updating Personal Memories for a Museum Tour by Reactivating Them

Open access
St. Jacques, Peggy L., Schacter, Daniel L.·2013·Psychological Science

Abstract

Memory can be modified when reactivated, but little is known about how the properties and extent of reactivation can selectively affect subsequent memory. We developed a novel museum paradigm to directly investigate reactivation-induced plasticity for personal memories. Participants reactivated memories triggered by photos taken from a camera they wore during a museum tour and made relatedness judgments on novel photos taken from a different tour of the same museum. Subsequent recognition memory for events at the museum was better for memories that were highly reactivated (i.e., the retrieval cues during reactivation matched the encoding experience) than for memories that were reactivated at a lower level (i.e., the retrieval cues during reactivation mismatched the encoding experience), but reactivation also increased false recognition of photographs depicting stops that were not experienced during the museum tour. Reactivation thus enables memories to be selectively enhanced and distorted via updating, thereby supporting the dynamic and flexible nature of memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797612457377

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contextual reinstatement could underlie the link between the quality of reactivation and subsequent memory effects.

    “Contextual reinstatement could underlie the link between the quality of reactivation and subsequent memory effects (42).”
  • In a previous behavioral study, the quality of memory reactivation modulates the extent to which reactivation strengthens subsequent true memories or creates false memories.

    “In a previous behavioral study, we showed that the quality of memory reactivation, as indexed by an individual’s subjective sense of recollection, modulates the extent to which reactivation strengthens subsequent true memories for a recently presented target event or creates false memories of novel information encountered for the first time after the target event has already occurred (42).”
  • In the previous behavioral study, subsequent false memories were greater for lures that followed targets that were highly reactivated.

    “however, subsequent false memories were also greater for lures that followed targets that were highly reactivated.”
  • In the previous behavioral study, subsequent true memories were improved when targets were highly reactivated compared with memories reactivated at lower levels.

    “We found that subsequent true memories were improved when targets were highly reactivated (i.e., the retrieval cues during reactivation matched the encoding experience) compared with memories that were reactivated at lower levels (i.e., the retrieval cues during reactivation mismatched encoding);”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
St. Jacques, P. L., & Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2013-02-13
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
537-543
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2161169061
Cited by
119
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag008441-30)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG008441, AG038079, AG 08441, F32AG038079, R37AG008441)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 060941, R01MH060941)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
memory reactivation, personal memories, recognition memory, false recognition, memory updating, memory distortion, retrieval cues, event memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Repression, Psychology, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult, Memory, Long-Term, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review