Cited by 45Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and Health

Probiotic Bifidobacterium bifidum strains desialylate MUC13 and increase intestinal epithelial barrier function

Open access
Segui-Perez, Celia, Huang, Liane Z. X., Paganelli, Fernanda L., Lievens, Elke, Strijbis, Karin·2025·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Probiotic bacteria including Bifidobacterial species have the capacity to improve intestinal health, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are often not understood. Bifidobacteria are considered keystone species but have a relatively low abundance in the adult intestinal tract. Bifidobacterium colonization depends on degradation of host-derived carbohydrates, including human milk oligosaccharides and mucin-associated oligosaccharides. Specific Bifidobacterium strains can enhance intestinal barrier integrity and improve symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders. We previously reported that the transmembrane mucin MUC13 localizes to the apical and lateral membrane and regulates epithelial tight junction strength. Here, we screened probiotic bacterial strains for their capacity to modulate MUC13 and enhance intestinal barrier function. Of these probiotic bacteria, a Bifidobacterium bifidum strain uniquely degraded the MUC13 O- glycosylated extracellular domain. Further characterization of two probiotic B. bifidum strains (W23 and W28) and the type strain 20456 demonstrated that the W23 and W28 strains adhered strongly to the apical surface, had high sialidase activity, penetrated the mucus layer, and enhanced epithelial barrier integrity. These results underscore the strain-specific properties of these specific B. bifidum strains that most likely contribute to their probiotic effects in the intestinal tract.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-92125-2

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast to most HBS, which primarily metabolize plant-derived glycans, B. bifidum degrades host-derived complex carbohydrates, including mucin and intestinal epithelial glycans.

    “In contrast to most HBS, which primarily metabolize plantderived glycans, B. bifidum degrades host-derived complex carbohydrates, including mucin and intestinal epithelial glycans [11,12] .”

    From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion (page not provided) states that B. bifidum degrades host-derived mucin glycans, and reports that strains W23 and W28 deglycosylate the intestinal epithelial glycocalyx, including MUC13. It names two other Bifidobacterium species that degrade plant-derived polysaccharides, but does not establish that most HBS primarily metabolize plant-derived glycans. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bifidobacterium bifidum is an infant gut symbiont specialized in degrading host-derived glycans.

    “Bifidobacterium bifidum ( B. bifidum ) is an infant gut symbiont specialized in degrading host-derived glycans.”
  • B. bifidum exhibits highly specialized metabolic pathways adapted to the unique nutritional and ecological conditions of the neonatal gut environment.

    “B. bifidum exhibits highly specialized metabolic pathways adapted to the unique nutritional and ecological conditions of the neonatal gut environment.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segui-Perez, C., Huang, L. Z. X., Paganelli, F. L., Lievens, E., & Strijbis, K.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Winclove Probiotics (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Strijbis, Karin
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-13
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
8778-8778
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408398805
Cited by
45
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 16
FWCI
21.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Winclove Probiotics B.V. (UU-KS-CSP)
  • European Research Council (ERC-2019-STG 852452)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
Bifidobacterium bifidum, probiotics, MUC13, sialidase activity, intestinal epithelial barrier, tight junctions, bacterial adhesion, mucin degradation, human milk oligosaccharides
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium bifidum, Epithelial Cells, Glycosylation, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Mucins, Neuraminidase, Caco-2 Cells, Tight Junctions, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review