Cited by 217Bone health and osteoporosis researchNutritional Studies and DietVitamin D Research Studies

Comparative fracture risk in vegetarians and nonvegetarians in EPIC-Oxford

Appleby, P, Roddam, A, Allen, N, Key, T·2007·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To compare fracture rates in four diet groups (meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians and vegans) in the Oxford cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford).Design Prospective cohort study of self-reported fracture risk at follow-up.Setting The United Kingdom.Subjects A total of 7947 men and 26,749 women aged 20-89 years, including 19,249 meat eaters, 4901 fish eaters, 9420 vegetarians and 1126 vegans, recruited by postal methods and through general practice surgeries.Methods Cox regression.Results Over an average of 5.2 years of follow-up, 343 men and 1555 women reported one or more fractures. Compared with meat eaters, fracture incidence rate ratios in men and women combined adjusted for sex, age and non-dietary factors were 1.01 (95% CI 0.88-1.17) for fish eaters, 1.00 (0.89-1.13) for vegetarians and 1.30 (1.02-1.66) for vegans. After further adjustment for dietary energy and calcium intake the incidence rate ratio among vegans compared with meat eaters was 1.15 (0.89-1.49). Among subjects consuming at least 525 mg/day calcium the corresponding incidence rate ratios were 1.05 (0.90-1.21) for fish eaters, 1.02 (0.90-1.15) for vegetarians and 1.00 (0.69-1.44) for vegans.Conclusions In this population, fracture risk was similar for meat eaters, fish eaters and vegetarians. The higher fracture risk in the vegans appeared to be a consequence of their considerably lower mean calcium intake. An adequate calcium intake is essential for bone health, irrespective of dietary preferences.Sponsorship The EPIC-Oxford study is supported by The Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602659

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EPIC-Oxford cohort had a significantly higher fracture risk compared with meat eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians.

    “Indeed, this cohort had a significantly higher fracture risk compared with meat eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians [270].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [270]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Appleby, P., Roddam, A., Allen, N., & Key, T.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Appleby, P
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2007-02-07
Volume
61
Issue
12
Pages
1400-1406
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2119182433
Cited by
217
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
Keywords
fracture risk, vegetarian diet, vegan diet, meat-eaters, calcium intake, bone health, energy intake
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Calcium, Dietary, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Meat, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Diet, Vegetarian, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Seafood, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review