Cited by 674NF-κB Signaling PathwaysSignaling Pathways in DiseaseNatural Compounds in Disease Treatment

Post-translational modifications regulating the activity and function of the nuclear factor kappa B pathway

Open access
Perkins, N D·2006·Oncogene

Abstract

The diverse cellular and biological functions of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) pathway, together with the catastrophic consequences of its aberrant regulation, demand specific and highly regulated control of its activity. As described in this review, regulation of the NF-kappaB pathway is brought about through multiple post-translational modifications that control the activity of the core components of NF-kappaB signaling: the IkappaB kinase (IKK) complex, the IkappaB proteins and the NF-kappaB subunits themselves. These regulatory modifications, which include phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, sumoylation and nitrosylation, can vary, depending on the nature of the NF-kappaB-inducing stimulus. Moreover, they frequently have distinct, sometimes antagonistic, functional consequences and the same modification can have different effects depending on the context. Given the important role of NF-kappaB in human health and disease, understanding these pathways will not only provide valuable insights into mechanism and function, but could also lead to new drug targets and the development of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for many pathological conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1209937

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modifications of p65 after translation, including phosphorylation and acetylation, change its activity by affecting DNA binding, its interaction with nuclear IκBα, and its association with chromatin modifiers like HAT and HDAC.

    “Although NF-κB nuclear translocation is the best-known mechanism for its activation [12], several lines of evidence indicate that posttranslational modifications in p65 subunit, such as phosphorylation and acetylation, impact its activity by altering DNA binding, interaction with inhibitor of κB α (IκBα) in the nucleus, and association with chromatin structure modifiers such as histone acetyltrans”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkins, N. D.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Perkins, N D
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2006-10-30
Volume
25
Issue
51
Pages
6717-6730
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W1999982643
Cited by
674
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 41
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment
Keywords
NF-κB signaling, post-translational modification, IκB kinase complex, IκB proteins, NF-κB subunits, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, SUMOylation, nitrosylation, therapeutic target, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Nucleus, Cytoplasm, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Hydrolysis, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, NF-kappa B, I-kappa B Kinase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review