Cited by 7,629Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHeart Failure Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 24 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, when added to standard care in patients with type 2 diabetes, remains unknown. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk to receive liraglutide or placebo. The primary composite outcome in the time-to-event analysis was the first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The primary hypothesis was that liraglutide would be noninferior to placebo with regard to the primary outcome, with a margin of 1.30 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio. No adjustments for multiplicity were performed for the prespecified exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 9340 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 3.8 years. The primary outcome occurred in significantly fewer patients in the liraglutide group (608 of 4668 patients [13.0%]) than in the placebo group (694 of 4672 [14.9%]) (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.97; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.01 for superiority). Fewer patients died from cardiovascular causes in the liraglutide group (219 patients [4.7%]) than in the placebo group (278 [6.0%]) (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.007). The rate of death from any cause was lower in the liraglutide group (381 patients [8.2%]) than in the placebo group (447 [9.6%]) (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97; P=0.02). The rates of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure were nonsignificantly lower in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group. The most common adverse events leading to the discontinuation of liraglutide were gastrointestinal events. The incidence of pancreatitis was nonsignificantly lower in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In the time-to-event analysis, the rate of the first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was lower with liraglutide than with placebo. (Funded by Novo Nordisk and the National Institutes of Health; LEADER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01179048.).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1603827

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

10 of 24 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 41 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 21
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The macrovascular benefits of glycemic control are less certain than its microvascular benefits.

    “Although glycemic control is associated with reductions in the risk of microvascular complications, the macrovascular benefits of glycemic control are less certain.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Robinson LE, 2013, BMJ Open, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 7,578

Metadata

Authors
Marso, S. P., Daniels, G. H., Brown-Frandsen, K., Kristensen, P., Mann, J. F. E., Nauck, M. A., Nissen, S. E., Pocock, S., Poulter, N. R., Ravn, L. S., Steinberg, W. M., Stockner, M., Zinman, B., Bergenstal, R. M., & Buse, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
375
Issue
4
Pages
311-322
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2425644022
Cited by
7,629
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 834 · 2025: 809 · 2024: 643 · 2023: 602 · 2022: 639 · 2021: 745 · 2020: 845 · 2019: 769 · 2018: 814 · 2017: 675 · 2016: 244
FWCI
837.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Collections portal (Koç University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Celgene
  • Massachusetts Medical Society
  • Intarcia Therapeutics
  • Orexigen Therapeutics
  • ResMed
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Esperion Therapeutics
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001111, UL1TR002489)
  • Relypsa
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular outcomes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, pancreatitis, gastrointestinal adverse effects, non-inferiority, high cardiovascular risk patients, GLP-1 receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Treatment Outcome, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review