Cited by 378Stress Responses and CortisolTreatment of Major DepressionNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acquired deficit of forebrain glucocorticoid receptor produces depression-like changes in adrenal axis regulation and behavior

Open access

Abstract

Dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is a hallmark of major depressive disorder. A number of studies have shown that this dysregulation is correlated with impaired forebrain glucocorticoid receptor (GR) function. To determine whether a primary, acquired deficit in forebrain GR signaling is an etiologic factor in the pathogenesis of depression, we generated a line of mice with time-dependent, forebrain-specific disruption of GR (FBGRKO). These mice develop a number of both physiological and behavioral abnormalities that mimic major depressive disorder in humans, including hyperactivity of the HPA axis, impaired negative feedback regulation of the HPA axis and, increased depression-like behavior. Importantly, a number of these abnormalities are normalized by chronic treatment with the tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine. Our findings suggest that imipramine's proposed activities on forebrain GR function are not essential for its antidepressant effects, and that alteration in GR expression may play a causative role in disease onset of major depressive disorder.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0406458102

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barden, N. (2004) J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 29, 185-193.15173895

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boyle, M. P., Brewer, J. A., Funatsu, M., Wozniak, D. F., Tsien, J. Z., Izumi, Y., & Muglia, L. J.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Muglia, Louis J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-12-27
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
473-478
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2156404675
Cited by
378
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 29
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
glucocorticoid receptor, major depressive disorder, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, HPA axis dysregulation, negative feedback regulation, depression-like behavior, imipramine, tricyclic antidepressants, antidepressant mechanism, glucocorticoid signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Depression, Hippocampus, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Imipramine, Mice, Inbred CBA, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Prosencephalon, Mice, Knockout, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review