Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 63

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional evolution of the p53 regulatory network through its target response elements

Jegga, Anil G., Inga, Alberto, Menendez, Daniel, Aronow, Bruce J., Resnick, Michael A.·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Transcriptional network evolution is central to the development of complex biological systems. Networks can evolve through variation of master regulators and/or by changes in regulation of genes within networks. To gain insight into meaningful evolutionary differences in large networks, it is essential to address the functional consequences of sequence differences in response elements (REs) targeted by transcription factors. Using a combination of custom bioinformatics and multispecies alignment of promoter regions, we investigated the functional evolution of REs in terms of responsiveness to the sequence-specific transcription factor p53, a tumor suppressor and master regulator of stress responses. We identified REs orthologous to known p53 targets in human and rodent cells or alternatively REs related to the established p53 consensus. The orthologous REs were assigned p53 transactivation capabilities based on rules determined from model systems, and a functional heat map was developed to visually summarize conservation of sequence and relative level of responsiveness to p53 for 47 REs in 14 species. Individual REs exhibited marked differences in transactivation potentials and widespread evolutionary turnover. Functional differences were often not predicted from consensus sequence evaluations. Of the established human p53 REs analyzed, 91% had sequence conservation in at least one nonprimate species compared with 67.5% for functional conservation. Surprisingly, there was almost no conservation of functional REs for genes involved in DNA metabolism or repair between humans and rodents, suggesting important differences in p53 stress responses and cancer development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0704694105

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.042 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1101/gad.831000 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nature02415 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15446 · DOI
  5. 10.1242/dev.00711 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/35000615 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.0508103103 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0501721102 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1633803100 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1128/MCB.22.24.8612-8625.2002 · DOI
  11. 10.4161/cc.4.8.1904 · DOI
  12. 10.1128/MCB.01742-06 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.012283399 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02595-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.07.004 · DOI
  17. 10.1128/MCB.25.14.6077-6089.2005 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.018 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1128/MCB.19.2.1438 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00308-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. GC Das, CV Shivakumar, SD Todd Oncogene 10, 449–455 (1995).
  22. 10.1002/bies.950170611 · DOI
  23. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0663 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/sj.neo.7900211 · DOI
  25. 10.1101/gr.2195604 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020398 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030093 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-9-r61 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.06.002 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030127 · DOI
  31. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-141 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.0404998101 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/hmg/ddi202 · DOI
  34. 10.1101/gr.1933104 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/nar/gkg129 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/nar/24.1.238 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Jegga, A. G., Inga, A., Menendez, D., Aronow, B. J., & Resnick, M. A.
Affiliations
  • *Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039;
  • Molecular Mutagenesis Unit, National Institute for Cancer Research, 16132 Genoa, Italy; and
  • Laboratory Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-01-22
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
944-949
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
63
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional evolution of the p53 regulatory network through its target response elements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0704694105
The paper
Jegga, A. G., Inga, A., Menendez, D., Aronow, B. J., & Resnick, M. A. (2008). Functional evolution of the p53 regulatory network through its target response elements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704694105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.