Cited by 364Epilepsy research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Enhanced synaptic connectivity and epilepsy in C1q knockout mice

Open access
Chu, Yunxiang, Jin, Xiaoming, Parada, Isabel, Pesic, Alexei, Stevens, Beth, Barres, Ben, Prince, David A.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Excessive CNS synapses are eliminated during development to establish mature patterns of neuronal connectivity. A complement cascade protein, C1q, is involved in this process. Mice deficient in C1q fail to refine retinogeniculate connections resulting in excessive retinal innervation of lateral geniculate neurons. We hypothesized that C1q knockout (KO) mice would exhibit defects in neocortical synapse elimination resulting in enhanced excitatory synaptic connectivity and epileptiform activity. We recorded spontaneous and evoked field potential activity in neocortical slices and obtained video-EEG recordings from implanted C1q KO and wild-type (WT) mice. We also used laser scanning photostimulation of caged glutamate and whole cell recordings to map excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connectivity. Spontaneous and evoked epileptiform field potentials occurred at multiple sites in neocortical slices from C1q KO, but not WT mice. Laser mapping experiments in C1q KO slices showed that the proportion of glutamate uncaging sites from which excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) could be evoked (“hotspot ratio”) increased significantly in layer IV and layer V, although EPSC amplitudes were unaltered. Density of axonal boutons was significantly increased in layer V pyramidal neurons of C1q KO mice. Implanted KO mice had frequent behavioral seizures consisting of behavioral arrest associated with bihemispheric spikes and slow wave activity lasting from 5 to 30 s. Results indicate that epileptogenesis in C1q KO mice is related to a genetically determined failure to prune excessive excitatory synapses during development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0913449107

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in complement component C1q result in an increase in the number of presynaptic boutons and exuberant excitatory connectivity in the cortex.

    “Consistent with this idea, deficits in complement component C1q results in an increase in the number of presynaptic boutons and exuberant excitatory connectivity in the cortex (Chu et al., 2010).”
  • KO mice lacking complement factors show cortical excitatory hyperconnectivity, supporting a role for microglia in elimination of excess synapses in mammalian neocortex.

    “Knockout (KO) mice lacking complement factors show cortical excitatory hyperconnectivity10, supporting a role for microglia in the elimination of excess synapses in the mammalian neocortex.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Rosen GD, Burstein D, Galaburda AM. Changes in efferent and afferent connectivity in rats with induced cerebrocortical microgyria. J Comp Neurol. 2000;418:423–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, Y., Jin, X., Parada, I., Pesic, A., Stevens, B., Barres, B., & Prince, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Departments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-04-07
Volume
107
Issue
17
Pages
7975-7980
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2092935640
Cited by
364
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS039579, P01NS012151, K99NS057940, P50NS012151, NS12151)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
C1q, complement system, synaptic pruning, epileptogenesis, epilepsy, neocortex, excitatory postsynaptic currents, axonal boutons, pyramidal neurons, behavioral seizures, field potentials, layer 4, layer V
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Evoked Potentials, Glutamates, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Photic Stimulation, Synapses, Complement C1q, Mice, Knockout, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Microscopy, Video, Neocortex, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review