Cited by 45Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Functional split brain in a driving/listening paradigm

Open access
Sasai, Shuntaro, Boly, Melanie, Mensen, Armand, Tononi, Giulio·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: When one drives on an easy route and listens to a radio, it is at times as if one’s brain splits into two separate entities: one that drives and one that listens. When, instead, one drives while listening to a global positioning system, there is only one functional stream. Here, using measures of information integration, we show that a brain may functionally split into two separate “driving” and “listening” systems when the listening task is unrelated to concurrent driving, but not when the two systems are related. This finding raises the possibility that under certain conditions of daily life, a single brain may support two independent functional streams, a “functional split brain” similar to what is observed in patients with an anatomical split.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1613200113

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IIT makes experimental predictions that have been validated in humans.

    “IIT also makes several experimental predictions that have been validated in humans”

    From Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousness (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Integrated Information section reports that the authors hypothesized higher integrated information during the integrated task and found that pattern in human participants. But the Discussion says the theory-related prediction about a transition to two streams of consciousness remains for future work. This study therefore supports a narrower experimental finding, not the claim that several IIT predictions have been validated in humans. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chen RH, Ito T, Kulkarni KR, Cole MW (2016) Large-scale multivariate activation states of the human brain. bioRxiv, dx.doi.org/10.1101/068221. Available at biorxiv.org/ content/early/2016/08/06/068221. Accessed September 14, 2016. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sasai, S., Boly, M., Mensen, A., & Tononi, G.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Tononi, Giulio
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-11-28
Volume
113
Issue
50
Pages
14444-14449
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2558379945
Cited by
43
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (220020255)
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (P300P3-158505)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
dual-task performance, driving simulator, GPS navigation, functional connectivity, information integration, integrated information, driving performance, brain networks
MeSH terms
Multitasking Behavior, Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Automobile Driving, Computer Simulation, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Nerve Net, Task Performance and Analysis, Multivariate Analysis, Geographic Information Systems, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review