Cited by 395Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

RIPK1 mediates a disease-associated microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Ofengeim, Dimitry, Mazzitelli, Sonia, Ito, Yasushi, DeWitt, Judy Park, Mifflin, Lauren, Zou, Chengyu, Das, Sudeshna, Adiconis, Xian +5 more·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Dysfunction of microglia plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia. However, there is a lack of knowledge about targets that can be safely manipulated for modulating microglia for the treatment of AD. The presence of a unique subtype of disease-associated microglia (DAM) has recently been implicated in mediating pathogenesis of AD. However, the mechanism that promotes the development of DAM is unclear, nor is it known how DAM may modulate the progression of AD. This study demonstrates that RIPK1-dependent transcription promotes DAM and lysosomal defects to mediate the accumulation of amyloid plaques in AD. Thus, targeting RIPK1 may provide an important therapeutic strategy for the treatment of AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1714175114

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altered Cst7 expression is associated with microglial dysfunction leading to impairment of Aβ clearance.

    “Previous studies associated altered Cst7 expression with microglial dysfunction leading to impairment of Aβ clearance,37”

    From Microglial <i>INPP5D</i> limits plaque formation and glial reactivity in the PSAPP mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says increased Cst7 expression caused microglial dysfunction by blocking lysosomal trafficking, and the Results show that Cst7 expression attenuated lysosomal function in a microglial cell line. The paper proposes that reducing Cst7 might promote Aβ clearance; it does not establish that altered Cst7 expression impaired Aβ clearance. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. [1]Mandrekar-Colucci S, Landreth GE. Microglia and inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2010;9:156–167. doi: 10.2174/187152710791012071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Karch CM, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Abduljaleel Z, et al. Evidence of trem2 variant associated with triple risk of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Hollingworth P, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. CHARGE consortium. EADI1 consortium Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43:429–435. doi: 10.1038/ng.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Jonsson T, et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:107–116. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Wollmer MA. Cholesterol-related genes in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1801:762–773. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [13]Hamilton G, Colbert JD, Schuettelkopf AW, Watts C. Cystatin F is a cathepsin C-directed protease inhibitor regulated by proteolysis. EMBO J. 2008;27:499–508. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [14]Ofengeim D, Yuan J. Regulation of RIP1 kinase signalling at the crossroads of inflammation and cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:727–736. doi: 10.1038/nrm3683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [15]Polykratis A, et al. Cutting edge: RIPK1 kinase inactive mice are viable and protected from TNF-induced necroptosis in vivo. J Immunol. 2014;193:1539–1543. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [16]Shutinoski B, et al. K45A mutation of RIPK1 results in poor necroptosis and cytokine signaling in macrophages, which impacts inflammatory responses in vivo. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23:1628–1637. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [17]Teng X, et al. Structure-activity relationship study of novel necroptosis inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:5039–5044. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.07.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [19]Degterev A, et al. Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:313–321. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  13. [20]Christofferson DE, et al. A novel role for RIP1 kinase in mediating TNFα production. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e320. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [22]Ofengeim D, et al. Activation of necroptosis in multiple sclerosis. Cell Rep. 2015;10:1836–1849. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  15. [23]Kondylis V, Kumari S, Vlantis K, Pasparakis M. The interplay of IKK, NF-κB and RIPK1 signaling in the regulation of cell death, tissue homeostasis and inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2017;277:113–127. doi: 10.1111/imr.12550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [24]Zhou W, Yuan J. Necroptosis in health and diseases. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;35:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  17. [25]Magister S, Kos J. Cystatins in immune system. J Cancer. 2013;4:45–56. doi: 10.7150/jca.5044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [26]Berger SB, et al. Cutting edge: RIP1 kinase activity is dispensable for normal development but is a key regulator of inflammation in SHARPIN-deficient mice. J Immunol. 2014;192:5476–5480. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  19. [28]Fillit H, et al. Elevated circulating tumor necrosis factor levels in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 1991;129:318–320. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90490-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [29]Frost JL, et al. An anti-pyroglutamate-3 Aβ vaccine reduces plaques and improves cognition in APPswe/PS1ΔE9 mice. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:3187–3199. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [30]Audrain M, et al. Alzheimer’s disease-like APP processing in wild-type mice identifies synaptic defects as initial steps of disease progression. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11:5. doi: 10.1186/s13024-016-0070-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [31]Xiong H, et al. Biochemical and behavioral characterization of the double transgenic mouse model (APPswe/PS1dE9) of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Bull. 2011;27:221–232. doi: 10.1007/s12264-011-1015-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [32]Troy CM, et al. Caspase-2 mediates neuronal cell death induced by beta-amyloid. J Neurosci. 2000;20:1386–1392. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-04-01386.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [33]Nakagawa T, et al. Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic-reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid-beta. Nature. 2000;403:98–103. doi: 10.1038/47513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [34]Baron R, Babcock AA, Nemirovsky A, Finsen B, Monsonego A. Accelerated microglial pathology is associated with Aβ plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell. 2014;13:584–595. doi: 10.1111/acel.12210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  26. [36]Riederer BM, Leuba G, Vernay A, Riederer IM. The role of the ubiquitin proteasome system in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2011;236:268–276. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2010.010327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [38]Papassotiropoulos A, et al. Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase on chromosome 10q is a susceptibility gene for sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegener Dis. 2005;2:233–241. doi: 10.1159/000090362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [39]Chiu IM, et al. A neurodegeneration-specific gene-expression signature of acutely isolated microglia from an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model. Cell Rep. 2013;4:385–401. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  29. [40]Ma J, et al. Microglial cystatin F expression is a sensitive indicator for ongoing demyelination with concurrent remyelination. J Neurosci Res. 2011;89:639–649. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [42]Colbert JD, Plechanovová A, Watts C. Glycosylation directs targeting and activation of cystatin f from intracellular and extracellular sources. Traffic. 2009;10:425–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00881.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [44]Mrak RE. Microglia in Alzheimer brain: A neuropathological perspective. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;2012:165021. doi: 10.1155/2012/165021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [45]Sedgwick JD, et al. Isolation and direct characterization of resident microglial cells from the normal and inflamed central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:7438–7442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  33. [47]François A, et al. Involvement of interleukin-1β in the autophagic process of microglia: Relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:151. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  34. [48]Yang CN, et al. Mechanism mediating oligomeric Aβ clearance by naïve primary microglia. Neurobiol Dis. 2011;42:221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  35. [49]Malm TM, Jay TR, Landreth GE. The evolving biology of microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12:81–93. doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0316-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  36. [50]Tanzi RE, Bertram L. Twenty years of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid hypothesis: A genetic perspective. Cell. 2005;120:545–555. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  37. [51]van Leeuwen FW, et al. Frameshift mutants of beta amyloid precursor protein and ubiquitin-B in Alzheimer’s and Down patients. Science. 1998;279:242–247. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5348.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  38. [52]McBrayer M, Nixon RA. Lysosome and calcium dysregulation in Alzheimer’s disease: Partners in crime. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013;41:1495–1502. doi: 10.1042/BST20130201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  39. [53]Perry VH, Nicoll JA, Holmes C. Microglia in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:193–201. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  40. [54]Newton K, et al. Activity of protein kinase RIPK3 determines whether cells die by necroptosis or apoptosis. Science. 2014;343:1357–1360. doi: 10.1126/science.1249361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  41. [55]Brown MS, Goldstein JL. The SREBP pathway: Regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor. Cell. 1997;89:331–340. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80213-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  42. [56]Malaspina A, Kaushik N, de Belleroche J. Differential expression of 14 genes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord detected using gridded cDNA arrays. J Neurochem. 2001;77:132–145. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.t01-1-00231.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  43. [57]Wanke F, et al. EBI2 is highly expressed in multiple sclerosis lesions and promotes early CNS migration of encephalitogenic CD4 T cells. Cell Rep. 2017;18:1270–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  44. [58]Gold ES, et al. 25-hydroxycholesterol acts as an amplifier of inflammatory signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:10666–10671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404271111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  45. [59]Lathe R, Sapronova A, Kotelevtsev Y. Atherosclerosis and Alzheimer–Diseases with a common cause? Inflammation, oxysterols, vasculature. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  46. [61]Magister S, et al. Regulation of cathepsins S and L by cystatin F during maturation of dendritic cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2012;91:391–401. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  47. [62]Maher K, Konjar S, Watts C, Turk B, Kopitar-Jerala N. Cystatin F regulates proteinase activity in IL-2-activated natural killer cells. Protein Pept Lett. 2014;21:957–965. doi: 10.2174/0929866521666140403124146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  48. [63]Yang DS, et al. Therapeutic effects of remediating autophagy failure in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease by enhancing lysosomal proteolysis. Autophagy. 2011;7:788–789. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.7.15596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  49. [64]Orre M, et al. Isolation of glia from Alzheimer’s mice reveals inflammation and dysfunction. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35:2746–2760. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  50. [65]Wang Y, et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell. 2015;160:1061–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  51. [67]Hickman SE, et al. The microglial sensome revealed by direct RNA sequencing. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1896–1905. doi: 10.1038/nn.3554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ofengeim, D., Mazzitelli, S., Ito, Y., DeWitt, J. P., Mifflin, L., Zou, C., Das, S., Adiconis, X., Chen, H., Zhu, H., Kelliher, M. A., Levin, J. Z., & Yuan, J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-09-13
Volume
114
Issue
41
Pages
E8788-E8797
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2754483429
Cited by
395
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 5
FWCI
14.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (1R01NS082257)
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) (1R01AG047231)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
RIPK1, disease-associated microglia, Alzheimer's disease, cystatin F, lysosomal pathway, microglial activation, phagocytosis, neuroinflammation, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Phenotype, Biomarkers, Cytokines, Microglia, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Presenilin-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review