Cited by 1,511Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsInflammasome and immune disorders

The microglial sensome revealed by direct RNA sequencing

Open access
Hickman, Suzanne E, Kingery, Nathan D, Ohsumi, Toshiro K, Borowsky, Mark L, Wang, Li-chong, Means, Terry K, El Khoury, Joseph·2013·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Microglia, the principal neuroimmune sentinels of the brain, continuously sense changes in their environment and respond to invading pathogens, toxins and cellular debris. Microglia exhibit plasticity and can assume neurotoxic or neuroprotective priming states that determine their responses to danger. We used direct RNA sequencing, without amplification or cDNA synthesis, to determine the quantitative transcriptomes of microglia of healthy adult and aged mice. We validated our findings using fluorescence dual in situ hybridization, unbiased proteomic analysis and quantitative PCR. We found that microglia have a distinct transcriptomic signature and express a unique cluster of transcripts encoding proteins for sensing endogenous ligands and microbes that we refer to as the sensome. With aging, sensome transcripts for endogenous ligand recognition were downregulated, whereas those involved in microbe recognition and host defense were upregulated. In addition, aging was associated with an overall increase in the expression of microglial genes involved in neuroprotection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3554

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TMEM119 and P2RY12 have been shown to be expressed solely by microglial cells and not by infiltrating macrophages.

    “TMEM119 and P2RY12 are especially useful, since they have been shown to be expressed solely by microglial cells and not by infiltrating macrophages [41,42,43].”

    From Beyond Activation: Characterizing Microglial Functional Phenotypes (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results (Microglia vs. Macrophages; page not provided) list Tmem119 and P2ry12 among transcripts unique to microglia in a comparison with peritoneal macrophages. The study did not test infiltrating macrophages, so it does not establish that these markers are absent from that population. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Aged or stressed microglia present a buildup of intracellular LDs, deterioration of mitochondrial efficiency, and downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation-related genes.

    “aged or stressed microglia present a buildup of intracellular LDs, deterioration of mitochondrial efficiency, and downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation-related genes [59, 60].”

    From The protective PLCγ2-P522R variant mitigates Alzheimer’s disease-associated pathologies by enhancing beneficial microglial functions (2025) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Results section, “Effects of aging on the microglial biological pathways” (page unavailable), reports that oxidative phosphorylation–related genes are downregulated in microglia from aged mice. The cited paper does not establish intracellular lipid-droplet buildup or deteriorating mitochondrial efficiency, and this result concerns aging rather than stressed microglia. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CX3CR1 is a chemokine receptor expressed on microglia and a subset of monocytes.

    “CX3CR1 is a chemokine receptor expressed on microglia and a subset of monocytes (8, 9).”

    From Heterozygous CX3CR1 Deficiency in Microglia Restores Neuronal β-Amyloid Clearance Pathways and Slows Progression of Alzheimer's Like-Disease in PS1-APP Mice (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results section, “Microglia vs. Macrophages” (page not specified), identifies Cx3cr1 among chemokine-receptor genes expressed at higher levels in microglia than in peritoneal macrophages. The paper does not establish expression in a subset of monocytes; its comparison is with macrophages, not monocytes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 63% of microglial sensome genes were DEGs in XO4+ microglia (p = 6.1 × 10−11).

    “A significant proportion (63%, p = 6.1 × 10−11, hypergeometric test) of microglial sensome genes30 were DEGs in XO4+ microglia”
  • There are several hypermorphic variants in PLCG2 that have been associated with autoimmune disease and cancer.

    “There are several hypermorphic variants in PLCG2 that have been associated with autoimmune disease and cancer [58–61, 66].”

    From The protective PLCγ2-P522R variant mitigates Alzheimer’s disease-associated pathologies by enhancing beneficial microglial functions (2025) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Discussion passages concern microglial gene expression and disease, not PLCG2 variants. Searches of our full-text copy for PLCG2, hypermorphic variants, and phospholipase C gamma 2 with autoimmunity or cancer found no passage addressing the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hickman, S. E., Kingery, N. D., Ohsumi, T. K., Borowsky, M. L., Wang, L.-C., Means, T. K., & El Khoury, J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Advanced Cell Diagnostics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Hickman, Suzanne E
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2013-10-27
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1896-1905
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2163410184
Cited by
1,511
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 142 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 2
FWCI
40.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG032349, R01AG032349)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI084884)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS059005, R01NS059005)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
Keywords
microglia, microglial transcriptome, pathogen recognition, aging, neuroprotection, peripheral macrophages, host defense, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Flow Cytometry, Ligands, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mass Spectrometry, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Leukocyte Common Antigens, Microglia, Macrophages, Peritoneal, Computational Biology, CD11b Antigen, Mice, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review