The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes
Open accessAbstract
Protein–protein recognition plays a central role in most biological processes. Although the structures of many protein–protein complexes have been solved in molecular detail, general rules describing affinity and selectivity of protein–protein interactions do not accurately account for the extremely diverse nature of the interfaces. We investigate the extent to which a simple physical model can account for the wide range of experimentally measured free energy changes brought about by alanine mutation at protein–protein interfaces. The model successfully predicts the results of alanine scanning experiments on globular proteins (743 mutations) and 19 protein–protein interfaces (233 mutations) with average unsigned errors of 0.81 kcal/mol and 1.06 kcal/mol, respectively. The results test our understanding of the dominant contributions to the free energy of protein–protein interactions, can guide experiments aimed at the design of protein interaction inhibitors, and provide a stepping-stone to important applications such as interface redesign.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain
Kussie, P. H., Gorina, S., Marechal, V., Elenbaas, B., Moreau, J., Levine, A. J., & Pavletich, N. P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.948 · Cited by 2,206
Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces
Bogan, A. A., & Thorn, K. S. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843 · Cited by 1,988
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728
Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges
DeLano, W. L. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00283-x · Cited by 767
Cited by
The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design
Alford, R. F., Leaver-Fay, A., Jeliazkov, J. R., O’Meara, M. J., DiMaio, F. P., Park, H., Shapovalov, M. V., Renfrew, P. D., Mulligan, V. K., Kappel, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · Cited by 1,532
Self-citationmCSM: Predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures
Pires, D. E. V., Ascher, D. B., & Blundell, T. L. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt691 · Cited by 1,066
Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks
Leman, J. K., Weitzner, B. D., Lewis, S. M., Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Alam, N., Alford, R. F., Aprahamian, M., Baker, D., Barlow, K. A., Barth, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · Cited by 888
Self-citationHot spots—A review of the protein–protein interface determinant amino‐acid residues
Moreira, I. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21396 · Cited by 760
Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040409x · Cited by 697
Ma, B., Elkayam, T., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1030237100 · Cited by 595
Keskin, O., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.077 · Cited by 519
High-resolution mapping of protein sequence-function relationships
Fowler, D. M., Araya, C. L., Fleishman, S. J., Kellogg, E. H., Stephany, J. J., Baker, D., & Fields, S. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1492 · Cited by 516
Self-citationSequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes
Hopf, T. A., Schärfe, C. P. I., Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M., Green, A. G., Kohlbacher, O., Sander, C., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Marks, D. S. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.03430 · Cited by 515
Predicting Protein–Protein Interactions from the Molecular to the Proteome Level
Keskin, O., Tuncbag, N., & Gursoy, A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00683 · Cited by 369
mCSM-PPI2: predicting the effects of mutations on protein–protein interactions
Rodrigues, C. H. M., Myung, Y., Pires, D. E. V., & Ascher, D. B. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz383 · Cited by 369
BeAtMuSiC: prediction of changes in protein–protein binding affinity on mutations
Dehouck, Y., Kwasigroch, J. M., Rooman, M., & Gilis, D. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt450 · Cited by 338
Moal, I. H., & Fernández-Recio, J. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts489 · Cited by 281
Engineered ACE2 receptor traps potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2
Glasgow, A., Glasgow, J., Limonta, D., Solomon, P., Lui, I., Zhang, Y., Nix, M. A., Rettko, N. J., Zha, S., Yamin, R., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016093117 · Cited by 251
Self-citationPredicting free energy changes using structural ensembles
Benedix, A., Becker, C. M., de Groot, B. L., Caflisch, A., & Böckmann, R. A. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0109-3 · Cited by 234
Structural Biology and Drug Discovery of Difficult Targets: The Limits of Ligandability
Surade, S., & Blundell, T. L. (2012) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.12.013 · Cited by 230
Efficient Determination of Protein–Protein Standard Binding Free Energies from First Principles
Gumbart, J. C., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400273t · Cited by 211
Systematic Analysis of Helical Protein Interfaces Reveals Targets for Synthetic Inhibitors
Jochim, A. L., & Arora, P. S. (2010) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb1001747 · Cited by 191
AB ‐Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions
Sirin, S., Apgar, J. R., Bennett, E. M., & Keating, A. E. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2829 · Cited by 179
Cui, Q., Sulea, T., Schrag, J. D., Munger, C., Hung, M.-N., Naïm, M., Cygler, M., & Purisima, E. O. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.035 · Cited by 162
Lise, S., Archambeau, C., Pontil, M., & Jones, D. T. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-365 · Cited by 107
“Alanine mutation data are collected from the Alanine Scanning Energetics database (ASEdb) [37] and from previous publications [11,13].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLapidoth, G. D., Baran, D., Pszolla, G. M., Norn, C., Alon, A., Tyka, M. D., & Fleishman, S. J. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24779 · Cited by 107
Hot-spot analysis for drug discovery targeting protein-protein interactions
Rosell, M., & Fernández-Recio, J. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2018.1430763 · Cited by 105
Wang, X., Singh, S. K., & Kumar, S. (2010) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0143-5 · Cited by 79
Plucking the high hanging fruit: A systematic approach for targeting protein–protein interactions
Raj, M., Bullock, B. N., & Arora, P. S. (2013) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2012.11.023 · Cited by 66
Dourado, D. F. A. R., & Flores, S. C. (2014) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24634 · Cited by 56
Golden, M. S., Cote, S. M., Sayeg, M., Zerbe, B. S., Villar, E. A., Beglov, D., Sazinsky, S. L., Georgiadis, R. M., Vajda, S., Kozakov, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja400914z · Cited by 47
Corrada, D., Soshilov, A. A., Denison, M. S., & Bonati, L. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004981 · Cited by 43
Are protein-protein interfaces special regions on a protein’s surface?
Tonddast-Navaei, S., & Skolnick, J. (2015) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4937428 · Cited by 31
Zhou, Z., Yin, Y., Han, H., Jia, Y., Koh, J. H., Kong, A. W.-K., & Mu, Y. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01850 · Cited by 30
Wu, D., Yin, R., Chen, G., Ribeiro-Filho, H. V., Cheung, M., Robbins, P. F., Mariuzza, R. A., & Pierce, B. G. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adq6150 · Cited by 27
Rämisch, S., Lizatović, R., & André, I. (2015) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24729 · Cited by 24
ESM ‐scan—A tool to guide amino acid substitutions
Totaro, M. G., Vide, U., Zausinger, R., Winkler, A., & Oberdorfer, G. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5221 · Cited by 19
Reliable prediction of protein–protein binding affinity changes upon mutations with Pythia-PPI
Tao, F., Sun, J., Gao, P., Gao, G. F., & Wu, B. (2025) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf231 · Cited by 10
Bolz, S. N., Schake, P., Stitz, C., & Schroeder, M. (2025) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2025.2557599 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kortemme, T., & Baker, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-10-15
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 14116-14121
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2150192011
- Cited by
- 804
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
