The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploiting transcription factor binding site clustering to identify cis-regulatory modules involved in pattern formation in the Drosophila genome
Open accessAbstract
A major challenge in interpreting genome sequences is understanding how the genome encodes the information that specifies when and where a gene will be expressed. The first step in this process is the identification of regions of the genome that contain regulatory information. In higher eukaryotes, this cis-regulatory information is organized into modular units [cis-regulatory modules (CRMs)] of a few hundred base pairs. A common feature of these cis-regulatory modules is the presence of multiple binding sites for multiple transcription factors. Here, we evaluate the extent to which the tendency for transcription factor binding sites to be clustered can be used as the basis for the computational identification of cis-regulatory modules. By using published DNA binding specificity data for five transcription factors active in the early Drosophila embryo, we identified genomic regions containing unusually high concentrations of predicted binding sites for these factors. A significant fraction of these binding site clusters overlap known CRMs that are regulated by these factors. In addition, many of the remaining clusters are adjacent to genes expressed in a pattern characteristic of genes regulated by these factors. We tested one of the newly identified clusters, mapping upstream of the gap gene giant (gt) , and show that it acts as an enhancer that recapitulates the posterior expression pattern of gt.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goto, T., Macdonald, P., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90916-1 · Cited by 277
The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy
Arnosti, D. N., Barolo, S., Levine, M., & Small, S. (1996) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.122.1.205 · Cited by 226
Self-citation
Cited by
Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions
Shlyueva, D., Stampfel, G., & Stark, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3682 · Cited by 1,356
Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence
Cooper, G. M., Stone, E. A., Asimenos, G., Green, E. D., Batzoglou, S., & Sidow, A. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3577405 · Cited by 1,359
Transcription regulation and animal diversity
Levine, M., & Tjian, R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01763 · Cited by 1,309
Self-citationDeterminants of enhancer and promoter activities of regulatory elements
Andersson, R., & Sandelin, A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0173-8 · Cited by 713
Bruce, A. W., Donaldson, I. J., Wood, I. C., Yerbury, S. A., Sadowski, M. I., Chapman, M., Göttgens, B., & Buckley, N. J. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0401827101 · Cited by 485
Kim, J.-W., Zeller, K. I., Wang, Y., Jegga, A. G., Aronow, B. J., O'Donnell, K. A., & Dang, C. V. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.13.5923-5936.2004 · Cited by 371
Iterative random forests to discover predictive and stable high-order interactions
Basu, S., Kumbier, K., Brown, J. B., & Yu, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711236115 · Cited by 317
Kheradpour, P., Ernst, J., Melnikov, A., Rogov, P., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Alston, J., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Kellis, M. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.144899.112 · Cited by 315
Transcriptional enhancers: Intelligent enhanceosomes or flexible billboards?
Arnosti, D. N., & Kulkarni, M. M. (2005) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.20352 · Cited by 309
Hare, E. E., Peterson, B. K., Iyer, V. N., Meier, R., & Eisen, M. B. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000106 · Cited by 302
Self-citationGotea, V., Visel, A., Westlund, J. M., Nobrega, M. A., Pennacchio, L. A., & Ovcharenko, I. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.104471.109 · Cited by 248
Multiple enhancers ensure precision of gap gene-expression patterns in the Drosophila embryo
Perry, M. W., Boettiger, A. N., & Levine, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1109873108 · Cited by 228
Self-citationIn pursuit of design principles of regulatory sequences
Levo, M., & Segal, E. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3684 · Cited by 215
A regulatory code for neurogenic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo
Markstein, M., Zinzen, R., Markstein, P., Yee, K.-P., Erives, A., Stathopoulos, A., & Levine, M. (2004) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01124 · Cited by 165
Self-citationGrossman, S. R., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Engreitz, J., Melnikov, A., Rogov, P., Tewhey, R., Isakova, A., Deplancke, B., Bernstein, B. E., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1621150114 · Cited by 165
Shaping segments: Hox gene function in the genomic age
Hueber, S. D., & Lohmann, I. (2008) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20823 · Cited by 152
Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo.
Reeves, G. T., & Stathopoulos, A. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000836 · Cited by 119
Andersson, R. (2015) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201400162 · Cited by 127
Dermitzakis, E. T. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg077 · Cited by 88
Papatsenko, D., & Levine, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409414102 · Cited by 82
Self-citationTabach, Y., Milyavsky, M., Shats, I., Brosh, R., Zuk, O., Yitzhaky, A., Mantovani, R., Domany, E., Rotter, V., & Pilpel, Y. (2005) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100030 · Cited by 72
Li, L., Zhu, Q., He, X., Sinha, S., & Halfon, M. S. (2007) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r101 · Cited by 69
Computational methods for the detection of cis-regulatory modules
Van Loo, P., & Marynen, P. (2009) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbp025 · Cited by 62
An Enhancer's Length and Composition Are Shaped by Its Regulatory Task
Li, L., & Wunderlich, Z. (2017) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2017.00063 · Cited by 42
“…enhancer can only achieve distinguishability if it consists of a cluster of TF binding sites within a short distance (Wasserman and Fickett, 1998; Berman et al., 2002; Frith et al., 2002; Halfon et al., 2002; Markstein et al., 2002; Rebeiz et al., 2002; Li et al., 2007; Wunderlich and Mirny,…”
BackgroundExploring the characteristics of sequence elements in proximal promoters of human genes
Bina, M., Wyss, P., Ren, W., Szpankowski, W., Thomas, E., Randhawa, R., Reddy, S., John, P. M., Pares-Matos, E. I., Stein, A., et al. (2004) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.08.013 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Berman, B. P., Nibu, Y., Pfeiffer, B. D., Tomancak, P., Celniker, S. E., Levine, M., Rubin, G. M., & Eisen, M. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-01-22
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 757-762
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2117549173
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.