Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

X-ray diffraction from intraneuronal paired helical filaments and extraneuronal amyloid fibers in Alzheimer disease indicates cross-beta conformation.

Open access
Kirschner, D A, Abraham, C, Selkoe, D J·1986·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.83.2.503
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Information about the structure of the paired helical filaments (PHF) that accumulate within human neurons and the amyloid fibers that accumulate in the extracellular spaces between neurons in Alzheimer disease has so far depended on electron microscopy of thin-sectioned or negatively stained material. To determine the protein conformation of these abnormal fibers, we have obtained x-ray diffraction patterns from unfixed human brain fractions highly enriched in PHF and from purified amyloid cores isolated from senile plaques. The predominant x-ray scatter evident from both types of samples, either wet or dry, is a sharp reflection at 4.76-A spacing and a diffuse one at about 10.6-A spacing. These features are characteristic of a beta-pleated sheet type of protein conformation. In doubly oriented dried pellets of PHF fractions, the two reflections are accentuated at right angles to each other and the arc at 4.76-A spacing is in the fiber direction indicating a cross-beta conformation. From the integral widths of the reflections we estimate the cross-beta crystallite to be about 80 A long in the fiber direction and about 40 A thick. These dimensions correspond to approximately four pleated sheets, each of which consists of approximately 16 hydrogen-bonded polypeptide chains running normal to the fiber direction. The cross-beta conformation of PHF and amyloid fibers that we have found from x-ray diffraction is in contrast to the predominant alpha-helical coiled-coil conformation of the neurofilaments with which they share epitopes and from which they have been postulated to derive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.83.2.503

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kirschner, D. A., Abraham, C., & Selkoe, D. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1986-01
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
503-507
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.83.2.503
OpenAlex
W2049535318
Cited by
565
References
3
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.