Cited by 341Mitochondrial Function and PathologyAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

RETRACTED: Mutations in mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase genes segregate with late-onset Alzheimer disease

Open access
Davis, Robert E., Miller, Scott, Herrnstadt, Corinna, Ghosh, Soumitra S., Fahy, Eoin, Shinobu, Leslie A., Galasko, Douglas, Thal, Leon J. +3 more·1997·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that defects in energy metabolism contribute to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). Cytochrome c oxidase (CO) is kinetically abnormal, and its activity is decreased in brain and peripheral tissue in late-onset AD. CO is encoded by both the mitochondrial and the nuclear genomes. Its catalytic centers, however, are encoded exclusively by two mitochondrial genes, CO1 and CO2 (encoding CO subunits I and II, respectively). We searched these genes, as well as other mitochondrial genes, for mutations that might alter CO activity and cosegregate with AD. In the present study, specific missense mutations in the mitochondrial CO1 and CO2 genes but not the CO3 gene were found to segregate at a higher frequency with AD compared with other neurodegenerative or metabolic diseases. These mutations appear together in the same mitochondrial DNA molecule and define a unique mutant mitochondrial genome. Asymptomatic offspring of AD mothers had higher levels of these mutations than offspring of AD fathers, suggesting that these mutations can be maternally inherited. Cell lines expressing these mutant mitochondrial DNA molecules exhibited a specific decrease in CO activity and increased production of reactive oxygen species. We suggest that specific point mutations in the CO1 and CO2 genes cause the CO defect in AD. A CO defect may represent a primary etiologic event, directly participating in a cascade of events that results in AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4526This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [1]Sherrington R, Rogaev E I, Liang Y, Rogaeva E A, Levesque G, et al. Nature (London) 1995;375:754–760. [Google Scholar]
  2. [7]Payami H, Montee K, Kaye J. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;54:650–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [24]Parker W D, Parks J K, Filley C M, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters B K. Neurology. 1994;44:1090–1096. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.6.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [28]Chomyn A, Lai S T, Shakeley R, Bresolin N, Scarlato G, Attardi G. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;54:966–974. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [29]Ghosh S S, Fahy E, Bodis-Wollner I, Sherman J, Howell N. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:325–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [41]Gabuzda D, Busciglio J, Chen L B, Matsudaira P, Yankner B A. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:13623–13628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [42]Dyrks T, Dyrks E, Hartmann T, Masters C L, Beyreuther K J. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:18210–18217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, R. E., Miller, S., Herrnstadt, C., Ghosh, S. S., Fahy, E., Shinobu, L. A., Galasko, D., Thal, L. J., Beal, M. F., Howell, N., & Parker, W. D.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1997-04-29
Volume
94
Issue
9
Pages
4526-4531
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2112602336
Cited by
341
References
44
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
late-onset Alzheimer's disease, cytochrome c oxidase, mitochondrial DNA mutations, CO1 gene, missense mutations, maternal inheritance, co-segregation, reactive oxygen species, energy metabolism
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Basal Ganglia Diseases, Electron Transport Complex IV, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, DNA, Mitochondrial, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Middle Aged, Mitochondria, Niemann-Pick Diseases, Point Mutation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review