The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Planning and Conducting Experimental Advertising Research and Questionnaire Design
Abstract
We give an overview of the most important decisions to be taken when planning and conducting experimental advertising research. Based on previous research and state-of-the-art academic insights, we discuss good methodological practices with respect to fleshing out the contribution of a study, developing and testing experimental stimuli, selecting appropriate samples, collecting data, designing questionnaires, deciding which variables and measures to include, and determining scale measurement. This set of guidelines should enable experimental advertising researchers to optimize their study designs and to carry them out in a correct way.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To rule out the potential effects of brand awareness or preexisting attitudes toward brands, we selected brands with which the study population were unfamiliar and had a neutral attitude toward (Geuens and De Pelsmacker 2017).”
From The Role of Perceived Surveillance and Privacy Cynicism in Effects of Multiple Synced Advertising Exposures on Brand Attitude (2024) · cites this paper as Geuens and De Pelsmacker 2017
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
The Psychology of Survey Response
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819322 · Cited by 4,734
Orne, M. T. (1962) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0043424 · Cited by 4,041
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008
Measurement and Control of Response Bias
Paulhus, D. L. (1991) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50006-x · Cited by 3,867
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002205 · Cited by 3,767
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
The Role of Emotions in Marketing
Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer, P. U. (1999) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070399272005 · Cited by 3,349
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs
Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175 · Cited by 3,107
Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review
Krumpal, I. (2013) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9 · Cited by 2,860
Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review
Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0 · Cited by 2,585
The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis
Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248506 · Cited by 2,523 · cited 1×
“…such as bias in collection and interpretation (Bottles, Begoli, and Worley 2014); validity, transparency, replicability, and interpretation of big data (Lazer et al. 2014; Boyd and Crawford 2012; Bollier and Firestone 2010); and lack of theoretical considerations (Bottles, Begoli, and Worley 2014).”
BackgroundThe C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing
Rossiter, J. R. (2002) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(02)00097-6 · Cited by 2,478
Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 · Cited by 2,452
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611430953 · Cited by 2,239
Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414531598 · Cited by 2,136
Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression
Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch, J. G., & McClelland, G. H. (2013) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0420 · Cited by 1,827
Designing Research for Application
Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. (1981) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208856 · Cited by 1,806
The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1943.10673459 · Cited by 1,737
Celebrity Endorsement: A Literature Review
Erdogan, B. Z. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1362/026725799784870379 · Cited by 1,734
Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462 · Cited by 1,616
Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195 · Cited by 1,412
Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation
Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840 · Cited by 1,262
Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination
Lenth, R. (2001) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313001317098149 · Cited by 1,200
Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices
Peter, J. P. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150948 · Cited by 1,189
Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research
Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000014 · Cited by 1,049
Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7 · Cited by 950
Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects
Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376800 · Cited by 902
The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review
Cox, E. P. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150495 · Cited by 867
Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004 · Cited by 813
Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys.
Robinson, J. P., Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1983) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578327 · Cited by 781
Rand, D. G. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004 · Cited by 699
Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance.
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.181 · Cited by 661
Handbook of marketing scales: multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research
Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Association for Consumer Research (U.S.) (1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-1833 · Cited by 636
Understanding the Impact of Synergy in Multimedia Communications
Naik, P. A., & Raman, K. (2003) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.4.375.19385 · Cited by 583
Designing Rating Scales for Effective Measurement in Surveys
Krosnick, J. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118490013.ch6 · Cited by 540
Barnette, J. J. (2000) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640021970592 · Cited by 529
The median split: Robust, refined, and revived
Iacobucci, D., Posavac, S. S., Kardes, F. R., Schneider, M. J., & Popovich, D. L. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.06.014 · Cited by 523
Bearden, W. O., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1999) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412984379 · Cited by 483
Death to Dichotomizing: Figure 1
Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/589561 · Cited by 459
Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., De Jong, M. G., & Baumgartner, H. (2010) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.2.199 · Cited by 444
Negative Consequences of Dichotomizing Continuous Predictor Variables
Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2003) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.3.366.19237 · Cited by 425
Misresponse to Reversed and Negated Items in Surveys: A Review
Weijters, B., & Baumgartner, H. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.11.0368 · Cited by 421
Rating Scales: Numeric Values May Change the Meaning of Scale Labels
Schwarz, N., Knaüper, B., Hippler, H., Noëlle-Neumann, E., & Clark, L. F. (1991) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269282 · Cited by 410
Marketing Scales Handbook: A Compilation of Multi-item Measures
Bruner, G. C., Hensel, P. J., & James, K. E. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 408
Assessing Three Sources of Misresponse to Reversed Likert Items
Swain, S. D., Weathers, D., & Niedrich, R. W. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.1.116 · Cited by 386
Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinal research
Schoenberg, N., & Ravdal, H. (2000) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/136455700294932 · Cited by 364
Interviewer effects in public health surveys
Davis, R. E., Couper, M. P., Janz, N. K., Caldwell, C. H., & Resnicow, K. (2009) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyp046 · Cited by 348
Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation
Vandecasteele, B., & Geuens, M. (2010) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.08.004 · Cited by 322
Self-citationAdvertising Repetition: A Meta-Analysis on Effective Frequency in Advertising
Schmidt, S., & Eisend, M. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1018460 · Cited by 308
Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis
Eisend, M. (2006) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.11.001 · Cited by 305 · cited 1×
“The first approach is experimental (Eisend 2006, 2010; Schmidt and Eisend 2015).”
BackgroundCatania, J. A., Binson, D., Canchola, J. A., Pollack, L. M., & Hauck, W. W. (1996) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/297758 · Cited by 287
Questionable Research Practices Revisited
Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615612150 · Cited by 279
Replication research's disturbing trend
Evanschitzky, H., Baumgarth, C., Hubbard, R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.003 · Cited by 271
Improving Rating Scale Measures by Detecting and Correcting Bias Components in Some Response Styles
Greenleaf, E. A. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172568 · Cited by 268
Is this for me? How Consumers Respond to Personalized Advertising on Social Network Sites
Keyzer, F. D., Dens, N., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2015.1082450 · Cited by 241
Cauberghe, V., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2010) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367390101 · Cited by 232
Cashing in on crashes via brand placement in computer games
Schneider, L.-P., Systems, B., & Cornwell, T. B. (2005) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2005.11072928 · Cited by 221
A researcher's guide to regression, discretization, and median splits of continuous variables
Rucker, D., McShane, B., & Preacher, K. J. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.04.004 · Cited by 221
Measurement for the Social Sciences
Rossiter, J. R. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7158-6 · Cited by 212
Danaher, P., & Dagger, T. (2013) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0241 · Cited by 197
Clicks as a Healthy Alternative to Bricks: How Online Grocery Shopping Reduces Vice Purchases
Huyghe, E., Verstraeten, J., Geuens, M., & Kerckhove, A. V. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0490 · Cited by 197
Self-citationPeople Studying People: Artifacts and Ethics in Behavioral Research
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1997) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 191
Median splits, Type II errors, and false–positive consumer psychology: Don't fight the power
McClelland, G. H., Lynch, J. G., Irwin, J. R., Spiller, S. A., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.006 · Cited by 185
Using Crowdsourcing Websites for Sociological Research: The Case of Amazon Mechanical Turk
Shank, D. B. (2015) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/s12108-015-9266-9 · Cited by 176
Pham, M. T., Geuens, M., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2013) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.04.004 · Cited by 167
Self-citationCorrelates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Method Effects
Quilty, L. C., Oakman, J. M., & Risko, E. F. (2006) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1301_5 · Cited by 167
Assessing response styles across modes of data collection
Weijters, B., Schillewaert, N., & Geuens, M. (2007) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0077-6 · Cited by 161
Self-citationWhy people say "yes": A dual-process theory of acquiescence.
Knowles, E. S., & Condon, C. A. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.379 · Cited by 160
Longitudinal Invariance of Self-Esteem and Method Effects Associated With Negatively Worded Items
Motl, R. W., & DiStefano, C. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0904_6 · Cited by 147
Response Styles in Telephone and Household Interviewing: A Field Experiment
Jordan, L. A., Marcus, A. C., & Reeder, L. G. (1980) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268585 · Cited by 141
Just Say No to Traditional Student Samples
Jones, W. L., & Sonner, B. S. (2001) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-41-5-63-71 · Cited by 141
Should We Take Don't Know for an Answer?
Gilljam, M., & Granberg, D. O. (1993) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269380 · Cited by 137
Encyclopedia of Psychological Assessment
Guha, M. (2004) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/09504120410513069 · Cited by 132
Consumer response to the preferred brand out‐of‐stock situation
Verbeke, W., Farris, P., & Thurik, R. (1998) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569810243640 · Cited by 121
Designing research with in-built differentiated replication
Uncles, M., & Kwok, S. (2012) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.005 · Cited by 120
Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall.
Judd, C. M., & Kulik, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.569 · Cited by 118
On the Psychometric Principles of Affect
Carroll, J. M., Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.14 · Cited by 113
Determinants of Scale Response: Label versus Position
Wildt, A. R., & Mazis, M. B. (1978) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377801500209 · Cited by 105
White, L., & Taket, A. R. (1996) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00048-8 · Cited by 100
The Middlemost Choice on Attitude Items
Klopfer, F. J., & Madden, T. M. (1980) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616728061014 · Cited by 99
Do you like What you Recognize?
Dens, N., Pelsmacker, P. D., Wouters, M., & Purnawirawan, N. (2012) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367410303 · Cited by 95
Psychometric Properties of Four 5-Point Likert Type Response Scales
Wyatt, R. C., & Meyers, L. S. (1987) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164487471003 · Cited by 94
Angell, R. J., Gorton, M., Sauer, J., Bottomley, P. A., & White, J. E. (2016) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1130665 · Cited by 92
PP for ‘product placement’or ‘puzzled public’?
Tessitore, T., & Geuens, M. (2013) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2501/ija-32-3-419-442 · Cited by 91
Self-citationWeathers, D., Sharma, S., & Niedrich, R. W. (2004) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.08.002 · Cited by 75
(2013) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.50.3.i · Cited by 67
Eisend, M. (2010) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20372 · Cited by 65
The Anchor Contraction Effect in International Marketing Research
de Langhe, B., Puntoni, S., Fernandes, D. V. D. H., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.2.366 · Cited by 63
The Effect of Familiarity with the Response Category Labels on Item Response to Likert Scales
Weijters, B., Geuens, M., & Baumgartner, H. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/670394 · Cited by 62
Self-citationThe Impact of Item Readability on the Endorsement of the Midpoint Response in Surveys
Velez, P. M., & Ashworth, S. D. (2007) · Survey research methods · doi:10.18148/srm/2007.v1i2.76 · Cited by 60
The Floor Is Nearer than the Sky: How Looking Up or Down Affects Construal Level
Kerckhove, A. V., Geuens, M., & Vermeir, I. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/679309 · Cited by 58
Self-citationSeeing the Big Picture: Multitasking and Perceptual Processing Influences on Ad Recognition
Duff, B. R. L., & Sar, S. (2014) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2014.967426 · Cited by 56
Manipulation Checks as Manipulation: Another Look at the Ease-of-Retrieval Heuristic
Kühnen, U. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209346746 · Cited by 55
Scale format effects on response option interpretation and use
Cabooter, E., Weijters, B., Geuens, M., & Vermeir, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.138 · Cited by 55
Self-citationMeulenaer, S. D., Pelsmacker, P. D., & Dens, N. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1018465 · Cited by 53
Gibbons, J. L., Zellner, J. A., & Rudek, D. J. (1999) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/106939719903300404 · Cited by 53
Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising
Dens, N., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.004 · Cited by 51
Advertising weak and strong brands: Who gains?
Dahlen, M., & Lange, F. (2005) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20069 · Cited by 51
Marketing Scales Handbook: Multi-Item Measures for Consumer Insight Research
Bruner, G. C. (2015) · Cited by 47
Richter, M. M. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.02.014 · Cited by 46
Goedertier, F., Dawar, N., Geuens, M., & Weijters, B. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.005 · Cited by 45
Self-citationNegative Consequences of Dichotomizing Continuous Predictor VariablesPreprint
McClelland, G. H., & Irwin, J. R. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 45
Advertising for New and Existing Brands: The Impact of Media Context and Type of Advertisement
Janssens, W., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2005) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/1352726042000306847 · Cited by 44
How Meaning Is Given to Rating Scales: The Effects of Response Language on Category Activation
Gannon, K. M., & Ostrom, T. M. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.0016 · Cited by 42
Contrast effects in attitude judgment: An examination of the accentuation hypothesis.
Judd, C. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.3.390 · Cited by 41
Probing suspicion among participants in deception research.
Taylor, K. M., & Shepperd, J. A. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.51.8.886 · Cited by 37
Effect of Ad-Irrelevant Distance Cues on Persuasiveness of Message Framing
Kulkarni, A. A., & Yuan, H. (2014) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2014.975877 · Cited by 36
Reinquiries in Advertising Research
Eisend, M., Franke, G. R., & Leigh, J. H. (2016) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1115381 · Cited by 35
When and why is perceived congruity important for in-game advertising in fantasy games?
Verberckmoes, S., Poels, K., Dens, N., Herrewijn, L., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.062 · Cited by 33
Does poor fit always lead to negative evaluations? Extension advertising and perceived brand quality
Dens, N., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2015) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2015.1057924 · Cited by 31
The influence of mood on attitude–behavior consistency
Elen, M., D’heer, E., Geuens, M., & Vermeir, I. (2012) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.011 · Cited by 30
Self-citation“Someone Should Do Something”: Replication and an Agenda for Collective Action
Kerr, G. F., Schultz, D. E., & Lings, I. N. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1077492 · Cited by 30
Park, J. H., Venger, O., Park, D. Y., & Reid, L. N. (2015) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2015.1023874 · Cited by 29
Billboard and cinema advertising: Missed opportunity or spoiled arms?
Frison, S., Dekimpe, M. G., Croux, C., & Maeyer, P. D. (2014) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.05.004 · Cited by 26
Statistical significance testing should be discontinued in mathematics education research
Menon, R. R. (1993) · Mathematics Education Research Journal · doi:10.1007/bf03217248 · Cited by 26
Understanding the pros and cons of big data analytics.
Bottles, K., & Begoli, E. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 25
Rosnow, R. L. (1997) · Cited by 24
Posavac, S. S., Herzenstein, M., & Sanbonmatsu, D. M. (2003) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1022858118201 · Cited by 21
Rajabi, M., Dens, N., Pelsmacker, P. D., & Goos, P. (2015) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2015.1110949 · Cited by 20
Weijters, B., Baumgartner, H., & Geuens, M. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.05.003 · Cited by 18
Self-citationLaczniak, R. N. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1060909 · Cited by 18
New Technologies Drive CPG Media Mix Optimization
Reynar, A., Phillips, J., & Heumann, S. (2010) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/s0021849910091567 · Cited by 18
Mixed-Media Modeling May Help Optimize Campaign Recognition and Brand Interest
Aleksandrovs, L., Goos, P., Dens, N., & Pelsmacker, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2015-025 · Cited by 16
Foos, A. E., Keeling, K. A., & Keeling, D. I. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1085820 · Cited by 14
Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept and MeasurementPreprint
Vandecasteele, B., & Geuens, M. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 13
Self-citationResearch and Publishing in theJournal of Advertising: Making Theory Relevant
Stafford, M. R. (2016) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1156592 · Cited by 12
Schultze, U., & Rennecker, J. A. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7_23 · Cited by 8
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 140 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Anderson Chris, 2008, Wired Magazine, 16
- Bollier David, 2010, The Promise and Peril of Big Data
- Bottles Kent, 2014, Physician Executive, 40, 6
- 10.2307/3150876 · DOI · Paper page
- Nunnally Jim C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
- Pany Kurt, 1987, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 7, 39
- 10.1037/0003-066X.51.8.886 · DOI
- Velez Pauline, 2007, Survey Research Method, 1, 69
- 10.2307/3151256 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Close Encounters of the AI Kind: Use of AI Influencers As Brand Endorsers
Thomas, V. L., & Fowler, K. (2020) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2020.1810595 · Cited by 585
The Role of Emotions in Advertising: A Call to Action
Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2019) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2019.1579688 · Cited by 220
Human vs. AI: The battle for authenticity in fashion design and consumer response
Lee, G., & Kim, H. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103690 · Cited by 152
Diversity in the digital age: how consumers respond to diverse virtual influencers
Ferraro, C., Sands, S., Zubcevic‐Basic, N., & Campbell, C. (2024) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2023.2300927 · Cited by 122
Green or greenwashed? Examining consumers' ability to identify greenwashing
Fella, S., & Bausa, E. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102281 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Geuens, M., & De Pelsmacker, P.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- ORCID
- Geuens, Maggie
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-01-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-100
- ISSN
- 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7805
- OpenAlex
- W2581015606
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 48.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advertising (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Keywords
- research design, questionnaire design, experimental stimuli, sample selection, scale measurement, advertising effects, methodological recommendations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review