Cited by 67Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Student self-assessment: why do they do it?

Yan, Zi, Brown, Gavin T. L., Lee, John Chi-Kin, Qiu, Xue-Lan·2020·Educational Psychology

Abstract

This study explores factors that predict students’ self-assessment intentions and practices using a framework based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). A total of 1425 Hong Kong students (Primary 4 to Secondary 3) participated in this study. Students’ intentions and practices pertaining to self-assessment and the predictors of their intentions and practices were assessed with 11 self-report scales aligned to the TPB constructs. The psychometric properties of scales were examined with Rasch analysis and the relations among the variables were investigated with path analysis based on Rasch-calibrated person measures. The results showed that attitude, subjective norms, self-efficacy, and perceived controllability were statistically significant predictors on intention to self-assess, while self-efficacy and intention had significant influence on self-assessment practice. Psychological safety was also found to have relatively weak but significant impact on both self-assessment intention and practice. This study lays a foundation for future investigations on how to promote meaningful self-assessment behaviour which is crucial for self-regulated and life-long learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-assessment improves student's motivation, engagement, and outcomes in computer-based, mobile-based, pen-paper based, and e-learning-based education environments.

    “However, there are a significant number of studies giving proof that uncovers and reveals that self-assessment improves student's motivation, engagement, their outcomes in computer-based, mobilebased, pen-paper based, and e-learning-based education environment [49,50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, Z., Brown, G. T. L., Lee, J. C.-K., & Qiu, X.-L.
Affiliations
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Yan, Zi
Venue
Educational Psychology
Published
2019-10-07
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
509-532
ISSN
  • 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5820
OpenAlex
W2978697879
Cited by
67
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6
FWCI
16.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
student self-assessment, theory of planned behavior, self-efficacy, perceived controllability, attitudes, subjective norms, psychological safety, student self-regulation, lifelong learning, primary and secondary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review