Cited by 393Muscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological ResponsesMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Effect of leucine metabolite β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate on muscle metabolism during resistance-exercise training

Nissen, S., Sharp, R., Ray, M., Rathmacher, J. A., Rice, D., Fuller, J. C., Connelly, A. S., Abumrad, N.·1996·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The effects of dietary supplementation with the leucine metabolite beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) were studied in two experiments. In study 1, subjects (n = 41) were randomized among three levels of HMB supplementation (0, 1.5 or 3.0 g HMB/day) and two protein levels (normal, 117 g/day, or high, 175 g/day) and weight lifted for 1.5 h 3 days/wk for 3 wk. In study 2, subjects (n = 28) were fed either 0 or 3.0 g HMB/day and weight lifted for 2-3 h 6 days/wk for 7 wk. In study 1, HMB significantly decreased the exercise-induced rise in muscle proteolysis as measured by urine 3-methylhistidine during the first 2 wk of exercise (linear decrease, P < 0.04). Plasma creatine phosphokinase was also decreased with HMB supplementation (week 3, linear decrease, P < 0.05). Weight lifted was increased by HMB supplementation when compared with the unsupplemented subjects during each week of the study (linear increase, P < 0.02). In study 2, fat-free mass was significantly increased in HMB-supplemented subjects compared with the unsupplemented group at 2 and 4-6 wk of the study (P < 0.05). In conclusion, supplementation with either 1.5 or 3 g HMB/day can partly prevent exercise-induced proteolysis and/or muscle damage and result in larger gains in muscle function associated with resistance training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.5.2095

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Supplementing with 1.5 to 3 g/day of calcium HMB during resistance training can increase muscle mass (+0.5-1 kg greater than controls during 3-6 weeks of training) and strength particularly among untrained subjects initiating training and the elderly.

    “It is well-documented that supplementing with 1.5 to 3 g/day of calcium HMB during resistance training can increase muscle mass (+ 0.5–1 kg greater than controls during 3–6 weeks of training) and strength particularly among untrained subjects initiating training [168–173] and the elderly [174].”
  • HMB supplementation at 1.5 and 3 g/day significantly increased lean body mass and strength in untrained males, with 3 g showing additional benefits.

    “Initial work by Nissen and colleagues [171] showed significant increases in lean body mass and strength with doses 1.5 and 3 g/day in untrained males, with the 3 g dose showing additional benefits over the lower dose.”
  • Previous studies demonstrated that resistance training and HMB increased muscle mass and strength and reduced body fat.

    “Previous studies demonstrated that RT and the metabolite of the branched-chain amino acid leucine, β-hydroxyβ-methylbutyrate (HMB), increased muscle mass and strength and reduced body fat [14–18], despite recent findings [19, 20].”
  • Supplementation of HMB (3g/day) enhances gains in fat-free mass following 6 weeks of resistance training.

    “Supplementation of HMB (3g/day) has previously been shown to enhance gains in fat-free mass following 6 weeks of resistance training [180].”
  • HMB supplementation resulted in larger gains in muscle function associated with resistance training.

    “and resulted in larger gains in muscle function associated with resistance training [180] on [108].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nissen, S., Sharp, R., Ray, M., Rathmacher, J. A., Rice, D., Fuller, J. C., Connelly, A. S., & Abumrad, N.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1996-11-01
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
2095-2104
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2148166373
Cited by
393
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, leucine metabolites, resistance training, muscle protein degradation, muscle damage, creatine kinase, 3-methylhistidine, dietary supplementation, protein intake, fat-free mass, muscle function
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Body Weight, Diet, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Leucine, Male, Methylhistidines, Muscle Proteins, Physical Education and Training, Valerates, Weight Lifting, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review