Cited by 87Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

In sync with the family: children and partners influence the sleep-wake circadian rhythm and social habits of women

Leonhard, Catherine, Randler, Christoph·2009·Chronobiology International

Abstract

Different factors have been proposed to influence morningness-eveningness, biological rhythms, and sleep-wake cycles, but few studies focused on the influence of social habits. Here, we focus on the influence of children and partners on the social habits of women at different stages of their lives and on synchronization within the family. One hundred and seventy-nine women participated in the study and were allocated into four groups: women without children, pregnant women without children, pregnant women with children, and non-pregnant mothers. Morningness was predicted by the presence of children, and earlier chronotype was predicted by the presence of children, pregnancy, and age. Average sleep duration was longest in pregnant women. The presence of children was responsible for a difference in rise times of approximately 1.5 h on the weekend. Subjective sleep-onset latencies were shortest in women with children. The synchrony between partners (husband/wife) was 0.46 in women without children, 0.79 in pregnant women, 0.40 in women with children, and 0.56 between mother and child. Partners' chronotypes were highly correlated, as were those of mother and child. This study suggests children have a strong influence on their mother's lifestyle and sleep-wake rhythm, far beyond the first months of life, and that children are a more important social factor than the male partner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07420520902821101

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies but not others found a greater prevalence of eveningness in men compared with women, who exhibit greater morningness.

    “Some studies (48, 49) but not others (9, 24) found a greater prevalence of eveningness in men compared with women, who exhibit greater morningness.”
  • In women, but not in men, having children was found to be the strongest determinant of morningness.

    “For instance, in women, but not in men, having children was found to be the strongest determinant of morningness.”
  • Having children may be a more important social factor influencing a woman's chronotype compared with their partner, and potentially an effect modifier in analyses of nutritional surveys or cohorts.

    “This may imply that having children is a more important social factor influencing a woman's chronotype compared with their partner (49), and potentially an effect modifier that needs to be considered in the analysis of nutritional surveys or cohorts.”
  • Evening chronotype is cross-sectionally associated with higher consumption of stimulants such as caffeine, energy drinks, sugar-sweetened beverages, and alcohol in adolescents and in college or university students.

    “Several other studies have reported cross-sectional associations between an evening chronotype and higher consumption of stimulants such as caffeine, energy drinks, sugar-sweetened beverages, and alcohol in adolescents (24) and in college or university students (49, 78, 79, 84).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leonhard, C., & Randler, C.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University of Education (DE)
Corresponding author
Randler, Christoph
Venue
Chronobiology International
Published
2009-01
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
510-525
ISSN
  • 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6073
OpenAlex
W2039432894
Cited by
87
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
chronotype, sleep-wake cycle, circadian rhythm, children, pregnancy, social habits, sleep latency, sleep duration, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Biological Clocks, Circadian Rhythm, Family Health, Female, Habits, Humans, Middle Aged, Mothers, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Social Behavior, Work Schedule Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review