The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The concurrent validity of the N -back task as a working memory measure
Abstract
The N-back task is used extensively in literature as a working memory (WM) paradigm and it is increasingly used as a measure of individual differences. However, not much is known about the psychometric properties of this task and the current study aims to shed more light on this issue. We first review the current literature on the psychometric properties of the N-back task. With three experiments using task variants with different stimuli and load levels, we then investigate the nature of the N-back task by investigating its relationship to WM, and its role as an inter-individual difference measure. Consistent with previous literature, our data suggest that the N-back task is not a useful measure of individual differences in WM, partly because of its insufficient reliability. Nevertheless, the task seems to be useful for experimental research in WM and also well predicts inter-individual differences in other higher cognitive functions, such as fluid intelligence, especially when used at higher levels of load.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One of the most common tasks used in these WM training studies is the N-back, an updating task that correlates significantly with measures of higher-level cognition, such as Matrix Reasoning20–24.”
From Near transfer to an unrelated N-back task mediates the effect of N-back working memory training on matrix reasoning (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“This holds true when the stimulus items are either from both the same (e.g., letters to digits) or different domain (e.g., spatial locations to digits) to the trained items (Li et al., 2008; Jaeggi et al., 2010; Anguera et al., 2012; Bürki et al., 2014; Waris et al., 2015; Küper and Karbach, 2016; Minear et al., 2016; Blacker et al., 2017).”
From Are Working Memory Training Effects Paradigm-Specific? (2019) · cites this paper as Jaeggi et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“In line with previous findings, there was evidence suggesting n-back training transfers to n-back tasks with new stimulus materials (Jaeggi et al., 2010; Anguera et al., 2012; Küper and Karbach, 2016; Minear et al., 2016; Soveri et al., 2017).”
From Are Working Memory Training Effects Paradigm-Specific? (2019) · cites this paper as Jaeggi et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies
Carroll, J. B. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571312 · Cited by 4,121
N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies.
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20131 · Cited by 3,560
Human cognitive abilities a survey of factor-analytic studies
Carroll, J. B. (2004) · Cited by 3,395
Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.117.1.34 · Cited by 3,093
Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 · Cited by 3,078
Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196772 · Cited by 2,882
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Tewes , U. 1991 . Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Erwachsene-Revision 1991 (HAWIE-R) , Bern : Hans Huber .
- Wechsler , D. 1981 . WAIS-R Manual , New York : The Psychological Corporation .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 977
Oxygen: The Rate-Limiting Factor for Episodic Memory Performance, Even in Healthy Young Individuals
Suzin, G., Frolinger, T. H., Yogev, D., Hadanny, A., Catalogna, M., Rassovsky, Y., & Efrati, S. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10091328 · Cited by 11
“The N-back task captures the active part of working memory when N ≥ 2 [15].”
BackgroundPlaying a Video Game and Learning to Think: What’s the Connection?
Wells, A. K., Mayer, R. E., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1007/s41465-021-00214-7 · Cited by 14
“…fosters effort in exercising spatial updating skill Adapted from Parong et al. (2020) The n-back task was used because it is a classic updating task (Jaeggi et al., 2010), and because the custom game being used in this study, CrushStations, was designed to have similar cognitive demands as an…”
BackgroundMethodWurz, A. J., Ayson, G., Smith, A., & Brunet, J. (2021) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-021-02280-y · Cited by 14
“Pairing EF tasks, such as the letter n-back (capturing working memory; [15]) or the Go/No Go (capturing response inhibition; [16]), with neuroimaging techniques can be used to explore neural activity during EF task performance [17, 18].”
MethodSinagra, C., & Wiener, S. (2022) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-022-00439-w · Cited by 11
Is cortical inhibition in primary motor cortex related to executive control?
Loomes, M., Tran, D. M. D., Chowdhury, N. S., Birney, D. P., Harris, J. A., & Livesey, E. J. (2023) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.12.013 · Cited by 13
Heroin use and neuropsychological impairments: comparison of intravenous and inhalational use
Ghosh, A., Shaktan, A., Nehra, R., Basu, D., Verma, A., Rana, D. K., Modi, M., & Ahuja, C. K. (2023) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-023-06332-8 · Cited by 11
Aneni, K., de la Vega, I. G., Jiao, M. G., Funaro, M. C., & Fiellin, L. E. (2023) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2023.02.002 · Cited by 17
Comparable responses to a wide range of olfactory stimulation in women and men
Lillqvist, M., Claeson, A., Zakrzewska, M., & Andersson, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35936-5 · Cited by 10
Tarefa N-back auditiva: desempenho entre diferentes grupos etários
Nardi, T. D., Sanvicente‐Vieira, B., Prando, M. L., Stein, L. M., Fonseca, R. P., & Grassi‐Oliveira, R. (2013) · Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica · doi:10.1590/s0102-79722013000100016 · Cited by 14
Specific Effects of Anger Rumination on Particular Executive Functions
Ding, X., Yang, Y., Qian, M., & Gordon-Hollingsworth, A. T. (2015) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/02.09.pr0.117c24z8 · Cited by 11
Memory and learning with rapid audiovisual sequences
Keller, A. S., & Sekuler, R. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.15.7 · Cited by 11
Sleep Health and Psychopathology Mediate Executive Deficits in Pediatric Obesity
Pearce, A. L., Mackey, E. R., Nadler, E. P., & Vaidya, C. J. (2018) · Childhood Obesity · doi:10.1089/chi.2017.0281 · Cited by 13
“…of an action after it is planned (stop signal task [SST]), 25 dynamic working memory requiring trial-to-trial updating with load manipulation, 26 and with ecologically relevant assessment of regulatory and metacognitive executive difficulties using the Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive…”
Laxminarayan, S., Wang, C., Ramakrishnan, S., Oyama, T., Cashmere, J. D., Germain, A., & Jaques Reifman, A. (2020) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa006 · Cited by 11
“We evaluated daytime cognitive performance on days 1 and 2 by measuring reaction time (RT) on the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) [22], which assesses alertness, and the RT of correct trials on the N-back task (0-back, 1-back, and 2-back) [23], which assesses working memory.”
MethodEating up cognitive resources: Does attentional consumption lead to food consumption?
Volz, S. C., Ward, A. C., & Mann, T. L. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105165 · Cited by 12
An Investigation of the Multilingual and Bi-dialectal Advantage in Executive Control.
Antoniou, K., & Spanoudis, G. C. (2020) · Ktisis at Cyprus University of Technology (Cyprus University of Technology) · Cited by 11
The Box Task: A tool to design experiments for assessing visuospatial working memory
Kessels, R. P. C., & Postma, A. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0966-7 · Cited by 13
“To measure working memory processing, a number of paradigms have been developed (see Postma & van der Ham, 2016, for an overview), such as span tasks – either verbal (Blankenship, 1938) or spatial (Berch, Krikorian, & Huha, 1998) in nature – or running working memory tasks such as n -back paradigms (see Jaeggi, Buschk…”
BackgroundThe Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition Performance
Grossman, S., Yeagle, E. M., Harel, M., Espinal, E., Harpaz, R., Noy, N., Mégevand, P., Groppe, D. M., Mehta, A. D., & Malach, R. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.081 · Cited by 12
Hacking the functions of sleep: noninvasive approaches to stimulate sleep neurophysiology
Krugliakova, E., Breuer, F., Adelhöfer, N., Alonso, A., Besedovsky, L., Murphy, K. R., Peters, E., Raczek, K., Rasch, B., Salvesen, L., et al. (2025) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00007.2025 · Cited by 21
Jing, M., Li, H., Li, C., Wei, X., Lin, W., Zhu, S.-C., Xu, Y.-L., & Li, L. (2023) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/2023/3770404 · Cited by 10
Nusslock, R., Kogan, S. M., Yu, T., Armstrong, C. C., Chen, E., Miller, G. E., Brody, G. H., & Sweet, L. H. (2024) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2024.06.018 · Cited by 10
“This is a widely employed functional MRI paradigm (Jaeggi et al., 2010; Owen et al., 2005) that has been shown to reliably elicit activation responses from brain regions associated with working memory and executive control, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), superior frontal…”
Byrne, E. M., Gilbert, R. A., Kievit, R., & Holmes, J. (2024) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2024.2393388 · Cited by 12
Kazinczi, C., Kocsis, K., Boross, K., Racsmány, M., Klivènyi, P., Vécsei, L., & Must, A. (2024) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-024-03813-x · Cited by 15
Valente, A., Lee, D., Choi, S., Billinghurst, M., & Esteves, A. (2024) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3654777.3676435 · Cited by 10
Stubbs, J. L., Corrow, S. L., Kiang, B. R., Corrow, J. C., Pearce, H. L., Cheng, A., Barton, J. J. S., & Panenka, W. J. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36286-3 · Cited by 12
Changes in Error Patterns during N-back Training Indicate Reliance on Subvocal Rehearsal
Chooi, W.-T., & Logie, R. H. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01066-w · Cited by 12
Rüttgens, T., & Wolf, O. T. (2022) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105803 · Cited by 14
Working memory is supported by learning to represent items as actions
Cochrane, A., & Green, C. S. (2023) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-023-02654-z · Cited by 10
“Here, it is worth noting that while both approaches are quite common (Foster et al., 2015; Jaeggi et al., 2010; Unsworth & Engle, 2007; van den Berg et al., 2012), they actually make opposite assumptions.”
BackgroundTAG-ME again: A serious game for measuring working memory
Hu, Y. Z., Parimoo, S., Chignell, M., Lowe, C. J., & Morton, J. B. (2023) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2023.2183361 · Cited by 10
“Stimuli appeared for 1000 ms, and the interstimulus interval was set to 1200 ms. Target stimuli appeared in 30% of the trials (Jaeggi et al., 2010; Miller et al., 2009), for a total of three targets in each practice block and 18 targets in each experimental block.”
Cognitive Load and Deception Detection Performance
Wielgopolan, A., & Imbir, K. K. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13321 · Cited by 13
Executive functions in patients with bilateral and unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction
Schöne, C. G., Vibert, D., & Mast, F. W. (2024) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-024-12267-7 · Cited by 10
Working Memory Capacity of ChatGPT: An Empirical Study
Gong, D., Wan, X., & Wang, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i9.28868 · Cited by 19
“Typical human performance drops significantly when n = 3 (Klatzky et al. 2008; Amon and Bertenthal 2018; Jaeggi et al. 2010), which can be defined as the working memory capacity limit of an average human.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAnderson, J. F. I., & Cockle, E. (2020) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acaa123 · Cited by 10
Perks of blindness: Enhanced verbal memory span in blind over sighted adults
Arcos, K., Jaeggi, S. M., & Grossman, E. D. (2022) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2022.147943 · Cited by 11
“The following consonants were selected for the n-back task to minimize confusion, maximize clarity, and for standardized letter duration when heard: C, D, G, K, P, Q, T, and V (Jaeggi et al., 2010).”
MethodSelf-citationWorking memory training shows immediate and long-term effects on cognitive performance in children
Pugin, F., Metz, A. J., Stauffer, M., Wolf, M., Jenni, O. G., & Huber, R. (2015) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.3665.3 · Cited by 11
Decision Making and Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review
Alfeo, F., Decarolis, D., Clemente, L., Delussi, M. D., de Tommaso, M., Curci, A., & Lanciano, T. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12111452 · Cited by 10
Zając-Lamparska, L., Zabielska‐Mendyk, E., Zapała, D., & Augustynowicz, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1371035 · Cited by 8
“The n-back task is a well-known measure of WM efficiency in content updating (Jaeggi et al., 2010; Schmiedek et al., 2014).”
BackgroundDuan, C., Chong, Y., Gong, J., Wu, Q., Sun, J., Zheng, C., Li, Z., Xia, L., Cheng, Z., Zhang, P., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1571964 · Cited by 10
“The 1-back has a low cognitive load and is suitable for the ability range of patients with MCI, which can effectively detect impairment of working memory in patients with MCI, while avoiding obscuring the true ability due to difficult tasks (31, 32).”
Chen, X., Watanabe, T., Kubo, N., Yunoki, K., Matsumoto, T., Kuwabara, T., Sunagawa, T., Date, S., Mima, T., & Kirimoto, H. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11060739 · Cited by 13
“565) and a significant simple interaction of condition × time (F [3,36] = 7.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWorking memory training does not improve executive functioning or fluid intelligence
Rodas, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211039502 · Cited by 10
“Visuospatial n-back task (experimental group) ( Jaeggi et al., 2010).”
Zhang, D., Johnstone, S. J., Li, H., Luo, X., & Sun, L. (2021) · Behaviour Change · doi:10.1017/bec.2021.26 · Cited by 9
Inguscio, B. M. S., Cartocci, G., Sciaraffa, N., Nicastri, M., Giallini, I., Greco, A., Babiloni, F., & Mancini, P. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12101291 · Cited by 9
Limpo, T., Rasteiro, I., Aguiar, S., & Magalhães, S. (2022) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-02003-5 · Cited by 8
“Given their distinctive features, it is likely that these tasks tap into different dimensions of working memory (Bühner et al., 2006; Jaeggi et al., 2010; Kane et al., 2007) that may relate differently with mindfulness.”
BackgroundEFFECT OF AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL FALSE MEMORY ON THE COMPLEXITY OF NEURAL OSCILLATIONS
Shabani, M., Sadeghi, M., Salehi, J., NAMAZI, H., & Khosrowabadi, R. (2023) · Fractals · doi:10.1142/s0218348x23501165 · Cited by 9
Creating a new dynamic measure of the useful field of view using gaze-contingent displays
Ringer, R. V., Johnson, A. P., Gaspar, J. G., Neider, M. B., Crowell, J., Kramer, A. F., & Loschky, L. C. (2014) · ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA) · doi:10.1145/2578153.2578160 · Cited by 9
Pugin, F., Metz, A. J., Stauffer, M., Wolf, M., Jenni, O. G., & Huber, R. (2014) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.3665.1 · Cited by 9
Arnould, A., Rochat, L., Dromer, E., Azouvi, P., & der Linden, M. V. (2016) · Journal of Neuropsychology · doi:10.1111/jnp.12107 · Cited by 9
Longitudinal Course and Predictors of Apathetic Symptoms after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Arnould, A., Rochat, L., Azouvi, P., & der Linden, M. V. (2017) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acx122 · Cited by 10
Memory bias and its association with memory function in women with posttraumatic stress disorder
Itoh, M., Hori, H., Lin, M., Niwa, M., Ino, K., Imai, R., Ogawa, S., Matsui, M., Kamo, T., & Kim, Y. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.365 · Cited by 11
Impact of pressure as a tactile stimulus on working memory in healthy participants
Nayyeri, M. D., Burgmer, M., & Pfleiderer, B. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213070 · Cited by 9
“The fMRI activations of the fronto-parietal network corroborated previous findings of brain activity when using this visual working memory task [36, 41, 42].”
MethodKenny, R., Mayo, C. D., Kennedy, S., Varga, A. A., Stuart-Hill, L. A., García-Barrera, M. A., McQuarrie, A. M., Christie, B. R., & Gawryluk, J. R. (2019) · Journal of Concussion · doi:10.1177/2059700219885503 · Cited by 9
Simultaneous non-Gaussian component analysis (SING) for data integration in neuroimaging
Risk, B. B., & Gaynanova, I. (2021) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/21-aoas1466 · Cited by 9
“In this paper, we focus on the N -back working memory task, which is a popular task used in cognition studies that may be related to fluid intelligence (Jaeggi et al., 2010), and rs-fMRI.”
MethodCousijn, J., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Kaag, A. M. (2021) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.13003 · Cited by 8
“However, the n-back task is generally considered to be less reliable to assess behavioral WM-related deficits.(47) As such, the behavioral implications of the current findings remain speculative and future research may benefit from including a more reliable WM task outside the MRI scanner to assess behavioral WM perfo…”
Brich, I. R., Bause, I. M., Hesse, F. W., & Wesslein, A. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106860 · Cited by 9
Modulation of brain states on fractal and oscillatory power of EEG in brain–computer interfaces
Zhang, S., Yan, X., Wang, Y., Liu, B., & Gao, X. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac2628 · Cited by 9
“To induce the fatigue state of subjects, a three-back working memory task was employed (Jaeggi et al 2010, Soveri et al 2017).”
Kerr, J., Reddy, P., Shewokis, P. A., & İzzetoğlu, K. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2022.3155368 · Cited by 9
Myllylä, M., Kyröläinen, H., Ojanen, T., Ruohola, J., Heinonen, O. J., Vahlberg, T. J., & Parkkola, K. I. (2022) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.1080/07420528.2022.2090374 · Cited by 9
“The n-back task (N-Back) is a continuous performance task that is considered useful for experimental research in working memory and is also considered to predict interindividual differences in fluid intelligence (Jaeggi et al. 2010).”
BackgroundWolff, B., Franco, V. R., Magiati, I., Pestell, C., & Glasson, E. J. (2023) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2023.2259042 · Cited by 11
“It assesses how often an individual can identify whether the current stimulus matches the one two trials back using continuous maintaining and updating of the previous two items viewed (Jaeggi et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodDamme, K. S. F., Kelley, N. J., Quinn, M. E., Glazer, J. E., Chat, I. K.-Y., Young, K. S., Nusslock, R., Zinbarg, R. E., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Craske, M. G. (2019) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-019-00712-4 · Cited by 13
Stark, G. F., Avery, E. W., Rosenberg, M. D., Greene, A. S., Gao, S., Scheinost, D., Constable, R. T., Chun, M. M., & Yoo, K. (2021) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.2105 · Cited by 8
Marx, C., Könczöl, C., Altmanninger, A., & Kubicek, B. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-024-01147-9 · Cited by 8
“Thus, their accuracy was higher than the 66% accuracy reported in previous validation studies [48].”
Zhu, H., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Su, H., & Yu, C. W. (2024) · Indoor and Built Environment · doi:10.1177/1420326x241284031 · Cited by 8
“The Subjects need to press as fast as they can on the button located under the circle that lights up as soon as it lights up To measure the reaction time and information processing speed of subjects N-back Task 46 Subjects are presented with a sequence of stimuli, and the task consists of indicating when the current s…”
InfluentialDoes working memory training in children need to be adaptive? A randomized controlled trial
Lau, R. C., Anderson, P. J., Gathercole, S. E., Wiley, J. F., & Spencer‐Smith, M. M. (2024) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.14180 · Cited by 9
“For the remaining 20 trials (6 target/same and 14 non-target/not same trials), children had to decide if the current object matched the object presented two items ago (Byrne et al., 2020; Jaeggi et al., 2010; Katz et al., 2014).”
The effect of cognitive control on addiction relapse
Gilbey, H., & Wilcockson, T. D. W. (2024) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066359.2024.2426469 · Cited by 8
“The task requires individuals to encode, maintain, and monitor previous stimuli while simultaneously deciding if the present stimulus is the same as the stimulus appearing n steps back in the series (Jaeggi et al. 2010).”
Wang, A., Yang, H., Wang, J., Yang, H., & He, D. (2025) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2025.105471 · Cited by 9
Kilts, C. D., & Ely, T. D. (2012) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52002-9.00007-3 · Cited by 8
Jesse, A., & Kaplan, E. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-018-01651-x · Cited by 8
Gaze-based Metrics of Cognitive Load in a Conjunctive Visual Memory Task
Bacchin, D., Gehrer, N. A., Krejtz, K., Duchowski, A. T., & Gamberini, L. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585650 · Cited by 8
“The n-back task is challenging as it requires simultaneous management of multiple cognitive processes [Jaeggi et al. 2010].”
MethodSchaffer, C., Goldart, E., Ligsay, A., Mazwi, M., Gallant, S. N., & Ehrmann, D. E. (2023) · Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s40746-023-00272-3 · Cited by 8
Using an OpenDS Driving Simulator for Car Following
Green, P., Jeong, H., & Kang, T.-P. (2014) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/2667239.2667295 · Cited by 8
“…'14, Sep 17-19 2014, Seattle, WA, USA ACM 978-1-4503-0725-3/14/09. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667295 Abstract This paper describes the modifications to free, opensource driving simulator software to simulate a carfollowing task resembling that in the NHTSA driver distraction protocol.”
MethodInfluentialObject individuation and compensation in healthy aging
Pagano, S., Fait, E., Brignani, D., & Mazza, V. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.01.013 · Cited by 10
“However, most studies conducted thus far involved tasks where participants had to maintain in memory a specific item for a variable amount of time (n-back tasks, see Jaeggi et al., 2010; Daffner et al., 2011).”
BackgroundKulikowski, K., & Potasz-Kulikowska, K. (2016) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1515/ppb-2016-0006 · Cited by 12
“As in the study of Jaeggi et al. (2010a), we used n-back without lure trials, one of the n-back versions accepted in the literature (Redick, & Lindsey, Konrad Kulikowski, Katarzyna Potasz-Kulikowska54 Can we measure working memory via the Internet?”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLeung, A. W. S., Barrett, L. M., Butterworth, D., Werther, K., DAWSON, D. R., & Brintnell, E. S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01266 · Cited by 8
“They were trained on a computerized auditory WM task (n-back) 5 days a week for 6 weeks, for a total of 20 h. Participant 1 had high levels of perceived stress, both pre- and post-training, and showed improvement on the satisfaction aspect of functional engagement only.”
MethodArnould, A., Rochat, L., Azouvi, P., & der Linden, M. V. (2018) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2017.1411468 · Cited by 7
Human Gaze-Parameters as an Indicator of Mental Workload
Volden, F. S., Edirisinghe, V. D. A., & Fostervold, K. I. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_23 · Cited by 8
Yoo, J., & Yim, D. (2018) · Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disorders · doi:10.12963/csd.18523 · Cited by 10
Hilton, D. C., Jarrett, M. A., Rondon, A. T., Tutek, J., & Mulla, M. M. (2019) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-019-00915-3 · Cited by 10
Frost, A., Tomou, G., Parikh, H., Kaur, J., Zivcevska, M., & Niemeier, M. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05623-x · Cited by 10
“1 3 one does with CD, even though stimulus presentation in the two tasks is rather different and 2-back is sometimes considered as a specialized and non-general measure of working memory compared to other tasks that preclude any eye movements (Kane et al. 2007; Jaeggi et al. 2010).”
Sauer, K. S., & Witthöft, M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.1177/20438087221138716 · Cited by 10
“…n-back task, only correlating to a very limited extent with other working memory tasks (e.g., digit span) and potentially even measuring other constructs (e.g., fluid intelligence) especially in higher load levels (Jaeggi, Buschkuehl et al., 2010; Jaeggi et al., 2010), could have played a role.”
BackgroundDo emotions evoked by music modulate visuospatial working memory capacity? A physiological study
Ribeiro, F. S., Santos, F. H., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2022) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/03057356221135352 · Cited by 8
Berivanlou, N. H., Setarehdan, S. K., & Noubari, H. A. (2016) · National and International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME) · doi:10.1109/icbme.2016.7890945 · Cited by 8
Rienäcker, F., Jacobs, H. I. L., Heugten, C. M. V., & Gerven, P. W. M. V. (2018) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.005 · Cited by 9
Stress Measurement in Multi-tasking Decision Processes Using Executive Functions Analysis
Paletta, L., Pszeida, M., Nauschnegg, B., Haspl, T., & Marton, R. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20473-0_33 · Cited by 8
Mewton, L. R., Hodge, A., Gates, N. J., Visontay, R., Lees, B., & Teesson, M. (2020) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103672 · Cited by 9
Lau, R. C., Anderson, P. J., Wiley, J. F., Huang, D., Surjatin, F., McIntosh, P., Gathercole, S. E., & Spencer‐Smith, M. M. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/47496 · Cited by 7
“In this 2-back test, the child was presented with a continuous stream of 22 common objects and animals (eg, carrot, flower, and cat; 6 targets and 16 nontargets), and the child had to decide for each object if it matched the object that was presented 2 items ago [5,33,34].”
MethodPerellón‐Alfonso, R., Oblak, A., Kuclar, M., Škrlj, B., Pileckyte, I., Škodlar, B., Pregelj, P., Abellaneda‐Pérez, K., David Bartrés-faz, A., Repovš, G., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1205119 · Cited by 7
“, N-back tasks; (20, 21)] or sequentially [e.”
Veinot, J., Cane, D. B., & Hashmi, J. A. (2025) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.104795 · Cited by 7
Liu, C., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15020225 · Cited by 9
“Updating Function—N-back Task (E. E. Smith et al., 1998): The N-back task is a widely used standard measure of executive working memory in cognitive neuroscience with good reliability and validity (Jaeggi et al., 2016).”
Parietal alpha and theta power predict cognitive training gains in middle-aged adults
Juras, L., Hromatko, I., & Vranić, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1530147 · Cited by 7
The roles of ability emotional intelligence in predicting affective decision-making
Sambol, S., Suleyman, E., & Ball, M. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02779-w · Cited by 17
“Participants were instructed to determine if the current letter matched the one presented either two, three, or four positions earlier in the sequence, depending on the specified N-back level [66].”
Delgado, P., Passos, P., Tavares, F., & Ferreira, H. A. (2025) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102930 · Cited by 7
Why is cognitive effort experienced as costly?
Otto, A. R., Westbrook, A., & Jean Daunizeau, A. (2025) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2025.10.012 · Cited by 10
Stress and working memory in children and adolescents: Insights from a multisystem approach
Tsai, N., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Quas, J. A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105176 · Cited by 7
Biophilic Design of Virtual Workplaces: Effect of Animations on User Attention
Romano, S., Laviola, E., Uva, A. E., & Gattullo, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48495-7_14 · Cited by 7
Warchoł, Ł., & Zając-Lamparska, L. (2023) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5709/acp-0404-2 · Cited by 10
Khatri, R. A., Baumgartner, N. W., Noh, K., Ullrich-French, S. C., Schmitt, S. A., Wang, C., & Kao, S. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.14558 · Cited by 7
Inguscio, B. M. S., Cartocci, G., Sciaraffa, N., Nicastri, M., Giallini, I., Aricò, P., Greco, A., Babiloni, F., & Mancini, P. (2024) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2024.109007 · Cited by 8
Dehnabaei, Z., Tabibi, Z., Ouimet, M. C., Moghaddam, A. M., & Delavar, M. E. (2024) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.06.019 · Cited by 7
Edworthy, J. R., Talbot, N., & Martin, N. (2025) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.047 · Cited by 7
Performance on the antisaccade task predicts dropout from cognitive training
Arbiv, D. C., & Meiran, N. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.009 · Cited by 7
Maternal influences on binge eating behaviors in children
Barrie, D. L. L., Hardy, R. A., Clendinen, C., Jain, J., Bradley, B., Teer, A. P., Michopoulos, V., Vance, L. A., Hinrichs, R. C., Jovanović, T., et al. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113600 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W. J., & Meier, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Bern (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Jaeggi, Susanne M.
- Venue
- Memory
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04-19
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 394-412
- ISSN
- 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0686
- OpenAlex
- W2104281515
- Semantic Scholar
- 1cdd5a855d4ded37954d52981b618cd9a6576f96
- Cited by
- 981
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 28.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- n-back task, working memory, concurrent validity, individual differences, reliability statistics, fluid intelligence, workload, psychometric properties
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Attention, Female, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychometrics, Reaction Time, Reading, Retention, Psychology, Serial Learning, Speech Perception, Verbal Learning, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review