Cited by 29Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

Wild Lactobacillus hilgardii (CCMA 0170) strain modifies the fermentation profile and aerobic stability of corn silage

Open access
Reis, Camila Branda, de Oliveira dos Santos, Andréia, Carvalho, Beatriz Ferreira, Schwan, Rosane Freitas, Ávila, Carla Luiza da Silva·2018·Journal of Applied Animal Research

Abstract

The wild Lactobacillus hilgardii (CCMA 0170) strain isolated from sugarcane silage showed good results as an inoculant in this silage, so the aim of this study was to evaluate its effect on corn silage. After harvested, three replicates for each fermentation time of corn silage: 19, 60 and 103 days were prepared with L. hilgardii or uninoculated (control silage). Experimental silos were opened and their chemical composition was determined. The silages opened after 103 days were also assessed for aerobic stability and microbial population after aerobic exposure. The new inoculant reduced the dry matter losses and conserved more water-soluble carbohydrates. The inoculated silage showed higher lactic acid bacteria populations and lower yeasts and filamentous fungi than the control silage. The concentration of lactic and acetic acid and 1,2-propanediol increased in inoculated silage. The population of filamentous fungi and yeasts after aerobic exposure in the inoculated silage was less than the minimum detectable (<2.0 log CFU g−1). Lactobacillus hilgardii CCMA 0170 presents qualities for a good microbial inoculant for corn silage, more research is needed to evaluate their performance in large-scale silos.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09712119.2017.1371609

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reis, C. B., de Oliveira dos Santos, A., Carvalho, B. F., Schwan, R. F., & Ávila, C. L. D. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
  • Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil
Corresponding author
Ávila, Carla Luiza da Silva
Venue
Journal of Applied Animal Research
Published
2017-09-07
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
632-638
ISSN
  • 0971-2119 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-1844
OpenAlex
W2752525925
Cited by
29
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Animal Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • CNPQ
  • FAPEMIG
  • CAPES
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
Lactobacillus hilgardii, corn silage, silage inoculants, aerobic stability, silage fermentation profile, lactic acid bacteria, filamentous fungi, yeast, propylene glycol, acetic acid, water-soluble carbohydrates, dry matter loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review