Cited by 23Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesAgricultural safety and regulations

Assessing herbal products with health claims

Lapenna, Silvia, Gemen, Raymond, Wollgast, Jan, Worth, Andrew, Maragkoudakis, Petros, Caldeira, Sandra·2015·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Herbs, herbal extracts, or phytochemicals are broadly used as foods, drugs, and as traditional medicines. These are well regulated in Europe, with thorough controls on both safety and efficacy or validity of health claims. However, the distinction between medicines and foods with health claims is not always clear. In addition, there are several cases of herbal products that claim benefits that are not scientifically demonstrated. This review details the European Union (EU) legislative framework that regulates the approval and marketing of herbal products bearing health claims as well as the scientific evidence that is needed to support such claims. To illustrate the latter, we focus on phytoecdysteroid (PE)-containing preparations, generally sold to sportsmen and bodybuilders. We review the limited published scientific evidence that supports claims for these products in humans. In addition, we model the in silico binding between different PEs and human nuclear receptors and discuss the implications of these putative bindings in terms of the mechanism of action of this family of compounds. We call for additional research to validate the safety and health-promoting properties of PEs and other herbal compounds, for the benefit of all consumers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2012.726661

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lapenna, S., Gemen, R., Wollgast, J., Worth, A., Maragkoudakis, P., & Caldeira, S.
Affiliations
European Commission (BE)
Corresponding author
Lapenna, Silvia
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2013-04
Volume
55
Issue
13
Pages
1918-1928
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W2084249527
Cited by
23
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
herbal products, health claims, phytoecdysteroids, European Union regulation, nuclear receptor binding, mechanism of action, sports supplements, bodybuilding supplements
MeSH terms
Animals, Consumer Product Safety, European Union, Humans, Mammals, Phytotherapy, Medicine, Traditional, Models, Biological, Plants, Medicinal, Ecdysteroids, Plant Preparations, Herbal Medicine, Marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review