Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 815

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fintech, financial inclusion and income inequality: a quantile regression approach

Open access
Demir, Ayse, Pesqué-Cela, Vanesa, Altunbas, Yener, Murinde, Victor·2022·The European Journal of Finance

Abstract

Although theory suggests that financial market imperfections – mainly information asymmetries, market segmentation and transaction costs – prevent poor people from escaping poverty by limiting their access to formal financial services, new financial technologies (FinTech) are seen as key enablers of financial inclusion. Indeed, the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN-2030-ASD) and the G20 High-Level Principles for Digital Financial Inclusion (G20-HLP-DFI) highlight the importance of harnessing the potential of FinTech to reduce financial exclusion and income inequality. This paper investigates the interrelationship between FinTech, financial inclusion and income inequality for a panel of 140 countries using the Global Findex waves of survey data for 2011, 2014 and 2017. We posit that FinTech affects inequality directly and indirectly through financial inclusion. We invoke quantile regression analysis to investigate whether such effects differ across countries with different levels of income inequality. We uncover new evidence that financial inclusion is a key channel through which FinTech reduces income inequality. We also find that while financial inclusion significantly reduces inequality at all quantiles of the inequality distribution, these effects are primarily associated with higher-income countries. Overall, our results support the aspirations of the UN-2030-ASD and G20-HLP-DFI.Highlights Harnessing the potential of FinTech to reduce financial exclusion and income inequality has been proposed by the UN and G20.We posit that FinTech affects income inequality directly and indirectly through financial inclusion.We invoke quantile regression analysis to investigate whether the effects of FinTech differ across countries with different levels of income inequality.We find that financial inclusion is a key channel through which FinTech reduces income inequality, at all quantile levels, primarily among higher-income countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1351847x.2020.1772335

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1080/15228916.2017.1419332 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.2139/ssrn.1931641 · DOI
  3. 10.1257/jep.24.3.207 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.jfi.2015.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Alliance for Financial Inclusion (AFI), 2018, Fintech for Financial Inclusion: A Framework for Digital Financial Transformation
  6. 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.12.030 · DOI
  7. 10.5202/rei.v3i2.75 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1257/app.20130537 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Aslan, G., C. Deléchat, M. M. Newiak, and M. F. Yang. 2017. “Inequality in Financial Inclusion and Income Inequality ” . International Monetary Fund Working Paper Series, No. 17/236. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2017/11/08/Inequality-in-Financial-Inclusion-and-Income-Inequality-45344. · doi:10.5089/9781484324905.001
  10. 10.1108/IJSE-11-2012-0228 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.026 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1108/ITP-12-2015-0295 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/20421338.2018.1509526 · DOI
  14. Asongu S. A., 2019, Sustainable Development, 1, 1
  15. 10.1257/app.20130489 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1257/app.20130272 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1257/app.20130533 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1086/261876 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/s10887-007-9010-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/00220388.2012.709615 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1086/684014 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.2139/ssrn.2634616 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.jce.2007.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1257/app.20130535 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.5089/9781513568928.001 · doi:10.5089/9781513568928.001
  26. 10.5089/9781498381598.001 · DOI
  27. 10.5089/9781513555188.006 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1596/1813-9450-8040 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1146/annurev.financial.050808.114334 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/00220388.2017.1371293 · doi:10.1080/00220388.2017.1371293
  33. 10.1257/app.5.1.163 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Duvendack M., 2011, What Is the Evidence of the Impact of Microfinance on the Wellbeing of Poor People?
  35. 10.2307/2297811 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.05.009 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/15228916.2017.1396791 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1080/00036846.2013.864039 · DOI
  40. Honohan, P. 2007. “Cross-Country Variation in Household Access to Financial Services.” Paper presented at the Conference “Access to Finance”, Washington DC, 15–16 March http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.170.9339&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  41. 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1562896 · DOI
  42. Jack, W., and T. Suri. 2011. “Mobile Money: The Economics of M-PESA.” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 16721. https://www.nber.org/papers/w16721. · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1057/imfer.2013.7 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.5296/rae.v1i1.304 · doi:10.5296/rae.v1i1.304
  45. 10.1093/wber/lhi008 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Klapper L., 2016, Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Financial Inclusion
  47. 10.1086/657122 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/rode.12573 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.12.007 · DOI
  50. Mbiti, I., and D. N. Weil. 2011. “Mobile Banking: The Impact of M-Pesa in Kenya.” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 17129. · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.ememar.2010.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1080/17531050903273768 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.3386/w19999 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.frl.2017.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1016/j.rdf.2017.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1142/S0217590818410059 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1080/10438599.2017.1322234 · DOI
  58. 10.1080/02692171.2017.1338677 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00614.x · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.018 · DOI
  61. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1257/app.20130475 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1142/S0217590818410047 · doi:10.1142/s0217590818410047
  65. World Bank, 2014, Global Financial Development Report 2014: Financial Inclusion
  66. 10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1080/00220388.2017.1380798 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Zhang, X., J. Zhang, and Z. He. 2018. “Is FinTech Inclusive? Evidence from China’s Household Survey Data.” Paper presented at the 35th IARIW General Conference, Copenhagen, 20–25 August.

Cited by

See all 815

Metadata

Authors
Demir, A., Pesqué-Cela, V., Altunbas, Y., & Murinde, V.
Venue
The European Journal of Finance
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
86-107
ISSN
  • 1351-847X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4364
OpenAlex
W3031910649
Cited by
815
References
9
FWCI
72.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
  • AXA Research Fund
  • Department for International Development
  • Economic and Social Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fintech, financial inclusion and income inequality: a quantile regression approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1351847x.2020.1772335
The paper
Demir, A., Pesqué-Cela, V., Altunbas, Y., & Murinde, V. (2022). Fintech, financial inclusion and income inequality: a quantile regression approach. The European Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2020.1772335

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.