CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,051Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHuman Behavior and Motivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries

Open access
Gagné, Marylène, Forest, Jacques, Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Crevier-Braud, Laurence, van den Broeck, Anja, Aspeli, Ann Kristin, Bellerose, Jenny, Benabou, Charles, Chemolli, Emanuela, Güntert, Stefan Tomas, Halvari, Hallgeir, Indiyastuti, Devani Laksmi, Johnson, Peter A., Molstad, Marianne Hauan, Naudin, Mathias, Ndao, Assane, Olafsen, Anja Hagen, Roussel, Patrice, Wang, Zheni, Westbye, Cathrine·2015·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
DOI 10.1080/1359432x.2013.877892
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Self-determination theory proposes a multidimensional conceptualization of motivation comprising autonomous and controlled forms. Whereas autonomous motivation relates positively to individuals’ optimal functioning (e.g., well-being, performance), controlled motivation is less beneficial. To be able to use self-determination theory in the field of organizational behaviour, the Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale was developed and tested using data from 3435 workers in seven languages and nine countries. Factorial analyses indicated that the 19-item scale has the same factor structure across the seven languages. Convergent and discriminant validity tests across the countries also indicate that the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as well as the theoretically derived antecedents to work motivation (e.g., leadership and job design) are predictably related to the different forms of motivation, which in turn are predictably related to important work outcomes (e.g., well-being, commitment, performance, and turnover intentions). Implications for the development of organizational research based on self-determination theory are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359432x.2013.877892

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 90 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Byrne B. M., 2006, Structural equation modelling with eqs: Basic concepts, applications, and programming
  3. 10.1037//0033-2909.125.6.627 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gagné M., 2010, Handbook of autonomy in cross-cultural context, 163
  5. 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hofstede G., 2001, Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations
  7. Koestner R., 2002, Handbook of self-determination research, 101
  8. Murphy P. R., 1999, The changing nature of work performance, 325
  9. Rousseau F. L., 2003, Revue Québécoise De Psychologie,, 24, 197
  10. 10.1037//1076-8998.6.1.43 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., Bellerose, J., Benabou, C., Chemolli, E., Güntert, S. T., Halvari, H., Indiyastuti, D. L., Johnson, P. A., Molstad, M. H., Naudin, M., Ndao, A., Olafsen, A. H., Roussel, P., Wang, Z., & Westbye, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Buskerud University College (NO)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Université Panthéon-Assas (FR)
  • Cheikh Anta Diop University (SN)
  • Université de Toulouse (FR)
Corresponding author
Gagné, Marylène
ORCID
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-02-05
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
178-196
ISSN
  • 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0643
DOI
10.1080/1359432x.2013.877892
OpenAlex
W2088200404
Semantic Scholar
725aa3f0e394bf102d25200507074beb64a86ef1
Cited by
1,051
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 138 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 6
FWCI
61.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture
  • Association Nationale Recherche Technologie France
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
Keywords
Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale, self-determination theory, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, employee motivation, scale validation, cross-cultural measurement, psychological needs, autonomy, competence, relatedness, leadership, job design, well-being, organizational commitment, employee performance, turnover intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review