Cited by 180Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Cognitive coping and depressive symptoms in the elderly: A longitudinal study

Kraaij, V., Pruymboom, E., Garnefski, N.·2002·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

The objective of the present longitudinal study was to examine the relationship between cognitive coping strategies and depressive symptoms at old age. At the two and a half year follow-up study, a community sample of 99 people aged 67 years and older filled out a self-report questionnaire comprising the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and a negative life events checklist. Cognitive coping strategies seemed to play an important role in relation to depressive symptoms in late life. Elderly persons with more depressive symptoms reported to use acceptance, rumination and catastrophizing to a significantly higher extent and positive reappraisal to a significantly lower extent than those with lower depression scores. After controlling for negative life events and prior depressive symptoms, acceptance and positive reappraisal retained their significant relationship with current depressive symptoms. It is suggested that intervention programs should pay attention to these aspects by challenging the 'maladaptive' strategies, and by supplying the more 'adaptive' strategies. This could be linked to the well-established cognitive therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607860220142387

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraaij, V., Pruymboom, E., & Garnefski, N.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2002-08
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
275-281
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2072440894
Cited by
180
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
cognitive coping, depressive symptoms, older adults, geriatric depression, acceptance, rumination, catastrophizing, positive reappraisal, negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation, maladaptive coping, cognitive therapy
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Defense Mechanisms, Depression, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Problem Solving, Social Environment, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review