Cited by 164Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Self-compassion enhances the efficacy of explicit cognitive reappraisal as an emotion regulation strategy in individuals with major depressive disorder

Open access
Diedrich, Alice, Hofmann, Stefan G., Cuijpers, Pim, Berking, Matthias·2016·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal has been shown to be an effective strategy to regulate depressed mood in healthy and remitted depressed individuals. However, individuals currently suffering from a clinical depression often experience difficulties in utilizing this strategy. Therefore, the goal of this study was to examine whether the efficacy of explicit cognitive reappraisal in major depressive disorder can be enhanced through the use of self-compassion and emotion-focused acceptance as preparatory strategies. Thereby, explicit cognitive reappraisal refers to purposefully identifying, challenging, and modifying depressiogenic cognitions to reduce depressed mood. To test our hypotheses, we induced depressed mood at four points in time in 54 participants (64.8% female; age M = 35.59, SD = 11.49 years) meeting criteria for major depressive disorder. After each mood induction, participants were instructed to either wait, or employ self-compassion, acceptance, or reappraisal to regulate their depressed mood. Depressed mood was assessed before and after each mood induction and regulation period on a visual analog scale. Results indicated that participants who had utilized self-compassion as a preparatory strategy experienced a significantly greater reduction of depressed mood during reappraisal than did those who had been instructed to wait prior to reappraisal. Participants who had used acceptance as a preparatory strategy did not experience a significantly greater reduction of depressed m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2016.04.003

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diedrich, A., Hofmann, S. G., Cuijpers, P., & Berking, M.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Diedrich, Alice
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
82
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2343094209
Cited by
164
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • German Research Foundation (BE 4510/3-1/HI 456/6-1, BE 4510/3-2/HI 456/6-2)
  • NIH (R01AT007257)
  • University of Mainz
  • University of Marburg, Germany
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
self-compassion, cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, major depressive disorder, mood induction, depressive mood, emotion regulation strategies
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review