Cited by 267Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationVestibular and auditory disorders

Cerebellar involvement in executive control

Bellebaum, Christian, Daum, Irene·2007·The Cerebellum

Abstract

The cerebellum has long been considered to be mainly involved in motor function. In the last 20 years, evidence from neuroimaging studies and from investigations of patients with cerebellar lesions has shown that the cerebellum plays a role in a range of cognitive functions. While cerebellar contributions have been shown for learning and memory, the cerebellum has also been linked to higher order cognitive control processes frequently referred to as executive functions. Although it is widely accepted that the cerebellum contributes to cognitive processing, the nature of cerebellar involvement is not well understood. The present paper focuses on the role of the cerebellum in executive processing, reviewing findings derived from neuroimaging studies or from studies investigating deficits related to cerebellar dysfunction. As executive functions cannot be considered as a unitary concept, special emphasis is put on cerebellar contributions to different aspects of executive control such as working memory, multitasking or inhibition. Referring to models derived from motor control, possible mechanisms of cerebellar involvement in executive processing are discussed. Finally, methodological problems in assessing executive deficits in general and in assessing the cerebellar contribution to executive processing in particular are addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14734220601169707

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cerebellum may modulate executive functions, likely through reciprocal connections to cortical regions.

    “Mounting evidence from human neuroimaging and acquired lesion studies suggests that the cerebellum may modulate executive functions [274], likely by means of reciprocal connections to cortical regions [26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bellebaum, C., & Daum, I.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Bellebaum, Christian
Venue
The Cerebellum
Published
2007-09
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
184-192
ISSN
  • 1473-4222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4230
OpenAlex
W2071656990
Cited by
267
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Cerebellum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
cerebellum, executive function, cognitive control, working memory, multitasking, inhibition, cerebellar lesions, cerebellar dysfunction, motor control models
MeSH terms
Cerebellum, Humans, Models, Biological, Neural Pathways, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review