Cited by 57Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Enhancing exposure therapy for anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder

Open access
McGuire, Joseph F, Lewin, Adam B, Storch, Eric A·2014·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Translating findings from basic science, several compounds have been identified that may enhance therapeutic outcomes and/or expedite treatment gains when administered alongside exposure-based treatments. Four of these compounds (referred to as cognitive enhancers) have been evaluated in the context of randomized controlled trials for anxiety disorders (e.g., specific phobias, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder), obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. These cognitive enhancers include D-cycloserine, yohimbine hydrochloride, glucocorticoids and cortisol and brain-derived neurotrophic factor. There is consistent evidence that cognitive enhancers can enhance therapeutic outcomes and/or expedite treatment gains across anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Emerging evidence has highlighted the importance of within-session fear habituation and between-session fear learning, which can either enhance fear extinction or reconsolidate of fear responses. Although findings from these trials are promising, there are several considerations that warrant further evaluation prior to widespread use of cognitive enhancers in exposure-based treatments. Consistent trial design and large sample sizes are important in future studies of cognitive enhancers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/14737175.2014.934677

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motivational interviewing and behavioral contracts are evidence-based models used to maximize adherence to treatment plans and encourage motivation toward lasting changes.

    “Motivational interviewing (MI) and behavioral contracts are evidence-based models used to maximize adherence to treatment plans and encourage motivation toward lasting changes [82,83].”

    From Pre-Sleep Anxiety: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches in Clinical Practice. (2026) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Introduction discusses treatment discontinuation, and the Discussion mentions homework compliance in exposure therapy, but neither addresses motivational interviewing or behavioral contracts. Searches for those terms and for adherence and lasting change found no passage supporting the attributed claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGuire, J. F., Lewin, A. B., & Storch, E. A.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
McGuire, Joseph F
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2014-06-27
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
893-910
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W2145081648
Cited by
57
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • International OCD Foundation
  • University of South Florida
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH093381)
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
nootropic drugs, exposure therapy, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, D-cycloserine, yohimbine, glucocorticoids, cortisol, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, fear extinction, fear reconsolidation, fear learning, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Behavior Therapy, Cycloserine, Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Yohimbine, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review