Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-protein diets in trained individuals

Antonio, Jose·2019·Research in Sports Medicine

Abstract

The United States (US) recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for protein is 0.8 grams per kilogram body weight per day (g/kg/d). The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) recently recommended an intake of 1.4-2.0 g/kg/d whereas the United States and Canadian Dietetic Association typically recommend a lower range of 1.2 to 1.7 g/kg/d. It is clear that the US RDA for protein is grossly inadequate for exercising individuals; thus, athletes are typically advised to consume twice the RDA. This falls within the range commonly recommended by academic societies. The effect of protein consumption that exceeds these aforementioned guidelines is not entirely known. This review examines the current literature as it pertains to the influence of very high protein intakes in trained individuals (i.e., humans). It is the scientific opinion of the author that athletes should consume at least 2.2 g/kg/d of protein.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15438627.2018.1523167

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1186/s12970-018-0210-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Antonio J., 2017, International Journal of Exercise Science, 10, 479
  3. 2016, Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2016, 9104792
  4. 10.1016/j.cct.2017.05.004 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00125-004-1511-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0389 · DOI
  7. 10.1159/000471485 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0056 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1186/1550-2783-8-10 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/jdi.12148 · DOI
  11. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.08.023 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/ejcn.2010.163 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/ajcn/33.5.978 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2337/diacare.25.3.425 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0007114512002516 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/ajcn/43.5.723 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/jcsm.12264 · DOI
  18. 10.2183/pjab.93.001 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s00394-012-0338-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/s12944-018-0791-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Antonio, J.
Affiliations
Department of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA
Venue
Research in Sports Medicine
Published
2018-09-22
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
195-203
ISSN
  • 1543-8627
  • 1543-8635
Cited by
17
References
13
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review