Cited by 199Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary protein requirements and adaptive advantages in athletes

Open access
Phillips, Stuart M.·2012·British Journal Of Nutrition

Abstract

Dietary guidelines from a variety of sources are generally congruent that an adequate dietary protein intake for persons over the age of 19 is between 0·8-0·9 g protein/kg body weight/d. According to the US/Canadian Dietary Reference Intakes, the RDA for protein of 0·8 g protein/kg/d is "...the average daily intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirement of nearly all [~98 %]… healthy individuals..." The panel also states that "...no additional dietary protein is suggested for healthy adults undertaking resistance or endurance exercise." These recommendations are in contrast to recommendations from the US and Canadian Dietetic Association: "Protein recommendations for endurance and strength trained athletes range from 1·2 to 1·7 g/kg/d." The disparity between those setting dietary protein requirements and those who might be considered to be making practical recommendations for athletes is substantial. This may reflect a situation where an adaptive advantage of protein intakes higher than recommended protein requirements exists. That population protein requirements are still based on nitrogen balance may also be a point of contention since achieving balanced nitrogen intake and excretion likely means little to an athlete who has the primary goal of exercise performance. The goal of the present review is to critically analyse evidence from both acute and chronic dietary protein-based studies in which athletic performance, or correlates thereof, have been measured. An attempt will be made to distinguish between protein requirements set by data from nitrogen balance studies, and a potential adaptive 'advantage' for athletes of dietary protein in excess of the RDA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114512002516

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Targeted nutritional strategies to optimize macronutrient intake are commonplace within sports nutrition and likely mean any differences in Table 2 are dampened in athlete populations.

    “However, targeted nutritional strategies to optimize macronutrient intake are commonplace within sports nutrition [[19], [20], [21]] and likely means any differences in Table 2 are dampened in athlete populations.”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1080/0264041031000140527 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Haff, 2003, Carbohydrate supplementation and resistance training, J Strength Cond Res, 17, 187

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Phillips, S. M.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Stuart M.
Venue
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2012-08
Volume
108
Issue
S2
Pages
S158-S167
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2112149522
Cited by
199
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
protein requirements, athletes, protein intake, exercise performance, nitrogen balance, Dietary Reference Intakes, resistance training, endurance training, protein supplementation
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Canada, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Nutritional Requirements, Physical Endurance, Sports, United States, Exercise, Nutrition Policy, Muscle Strength, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review