Cited by 73Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Attentional bias towards negative stimuli in healthy individuals and the effects of trait anxiety

Open access
Veerapa, Emilie, Grandgenevre, Pierre, El Fayoumi, Mohamed, Vinnac, Benjamin, Haelewyn, Océanne, Szaffarczyk, Sébastien, Vaiva, Guillaume, D’Hondt, Fabien·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the time course of attentional bias for negative information in healthy individuals and to assess the associated influence of trait anxiety. Thirty-eight healthy volunteers performed an emotional dot-probe task with pairs of negative and neutral scenes, presented for either 1 or 2 s and followed by a target placed at the previous location of either negative or neutral stimulus. Analyses included eye movements during the presentation of the scenes and response times associated with target localization. In a second step, analyses focused on the influence of trait anxiety. While there was no significant difference at the behavioral level, the eye-tracking data revealed that negative information held longer attention than neutral stimuli once fixated. This initial maintenance bias towards negative pictures then increased with increasing trait anxiety. However, at later processing stages, only individuals with the highest trait anxiety appeared to fixate longer on negative pictures than neutral pictures, individuals with low trait anxiety showing the opposite pattern. This study provides novel evidence that healthy individuals display an attentional maintenance bias towards negative stimuli, which is associated with trait anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-68490-5

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hypervigilance is tightly coupled with attentional threat bias, referring to the fact that negative valence content captures human attention more than other content.

    “It is tightly coupled with attentional threat bias, referring to the fact that negative valence content captures human attention more than other content [121,122].”

    From Impact of Media-Induced Uncertainty on Mental Health: Narrative-Based Perspective. (2025) · cites this paper as [122]

    The Discussion reports that healthy volunteers spent more time looking at negative than neutral pictures, supporting an attentional bias toward negative content. But it found no faster initial orienting toward negative pictures and favored attentional maintenance over vigilance; it therefore does not establish the claimed tight coupling between hypervigilance and attentional threat bias. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Converging evidence indicates that negative emotional content is prioritized over neutral content even during early stages of visual attention.

    “Converging evidence indicates that negative emotional content is prioritized over neutral content even during early stages of visual attention [122-124].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veerapa, E., Grandgenevre, P., El Fayoumi, M., Vinnac, B., Haelewyn, O., Szaffarczyk, S., Vaiva, G., & D’Hondt, F.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
D’Hondt, Fabien
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-07-16
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
11826-11826
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3043750982
Cited by
73
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fondation Pierre Deniker pour la Recherche et la Prévention en Santé Mentale
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
attentional bias, negative stimuli, trait anxiety, eye movements, fixation duration, emotional scenes, healthy individuals
MeSH terms
Attentional Bias, Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review