The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do you like me? Neural correlates of social evaluation and developmental trajectories
Abstract
Social acceptance is of key importance for healthy functioning. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine age-related changes in the neural correlates of social acceptance and rejection processing. Participants from four age groups participated in the study: pre-pubertal children (8-10 years), early adolescents (12-14 years), older adolescents (16-17 years) and young adults (19-25 years). During the experiment, participants were presented with unfamiliar faces of peers and were asked to predict whether they expected to be liked or disliked by the other person, followed by feedback indicating acceptance or rejection. Results showed that activation in the ventral mPFC and striatum to social feedback was context-dependent; there was increased activation when participants had positive expectations about social evaluation, and increased activation following social acceptance feedback. Age-related comparisons revealed a linear increase in activity with age in these brain regions for positive expectations of social evaluation. Similarly, a linear increase with age was found for activation in the striatum, ventral mPFC, OFC, and lateral PFC for rejection feedback. No age-related differences in neural activation were shown for social acceptance feedback. Together, these results provide important insights in the developmental trajectories of brain regions implicated in social and affective behavior.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“other fMRI evidence for earlier maturation of neural responses to positive than negative feedback”
From Rewards, aversions and affect in adolescence: emerging convergences across laboratory animal and human data (2011) · cites this paper as Gunther Moor et al, 2010
In the citing paper
“gradual age-related increases in activation to negative feedback/aversive consequences in a variety of cognitive control regions”
From Rewards, aversions and affect in adolescence: emerging convergences across laboratory animal and human data (2011) · cites this paper as Gunther Moor et al, 2010
In the citing paper
“The ventral striatum also shows evidence of modulation based on receiving positive (i.e., being told another person likes you) compared to neutral or negative social feedback 42, 43.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, other research shows that adolescents, like adults, display striatum responses to positive social feedback 42, 43 (i.e., being liked), but also that adolescents higher in social anxiety display an increased striatum response to positive relative to negative social feedback 42.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“exclusion differs from fair play by defying widely-held baseline expectations of approximate fairness (Gunther Moor et al., 2010; Rodman et al., 2017), thereby inducing expectancy violations”
From Feeling left out or just surprised? Neural correlates of social exclusion and overinclusion in adolescence (2020) · cites this paper as Gunther Moor et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“a well-validated paradigm that has been shown to elicit genuine experiences of social evaluation (20–23).”
From Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“these findings are consistent with one prior study showing that early adolescents expected to be liked less frequently than adults (20).”
From Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Likes on social media are quantifiable, public signs of status (see Nesi & Prinstein, 2018 for digital status-seeking on social media), and so getting another person to like one’s self-expression elicits feelings of validation, conferring positive status and regard, and thus leads to positive emotions (Davey, Allen, Harrison, Dwyer, & Yücel, 2009; Gunther Moor, van Leijenhorst, Rombouts, Crone, &”
From Getting Fewer “Likes” Than Others on Social Media Elicits Emotional Distress Among Victimized Adolescents (2020) · cites this paper as Gunther Moor, van Leijenhorst, Rombouts, Crone, & Van der Molen, 2010
In the citing paper
“Indeed, the VS reacts to not only positively valenced contexts but also negative ones (e.g., peer acceptance and rejection; Gunther Moor et al., 2010; Guyer et al., 2015, Guyer et al., 2012a, Guyer et al., 2012b), and the amygdala reacts to not only negatively valenced contexts but also positive ones (e.g., fearful and happy faces; Canli et al., 2002, or negative/threatening and positive/interest”
From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Gunther Moor et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“Gunther Moor et al. (2010) showing that activation of the striatum, particularly, the putamen, and vmPFC linearly increased across ages 10–21 to both anticipating peer acceptance and receiving peer rejection.”
From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Gunther Moor et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“Gunther Moor et al. (2010) found that, in adults, the subACC activated to being accepted when expecting peer acceptance and rejected when expecting peer rejection.”
From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Gunther Moor et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
(1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,071
(2005) · CTIT technical reports series · Cited by 5,307
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 1×
“There is a rapidly growing literature on the use of neuroimaging methods to identify the neural mechanisms underlying human social interactions, with a specific focus on social feedback processing (eg, Amodio & Frith, 2006 ; Blakemore, Winston, & Frith, 2004 ; Rilling, King-Casas, & Sanfey, 2008 ).”
BackgroundRose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98 · Cited by 2,517
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83 · Cited by 2,517
Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox
Brett, M. (2002) · NeuroImage · Cited by 2,273
Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens
Knutson, B., Adams, C. M., Fong, G. W., & Hommer, D. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-j0002.2001 · Cited by 2,244
The Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC): factor structure, reliability, and validity
MARCH, J. S., PARKER, J. D. A., SULLIVAN, K., STALLINGS, P., & CONNERS, C. K. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199704000-00019 · Cited by 2,236
Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. D., Cooper, J. C., Robertson, E. R., Chopra, S., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Gross, J. J. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.030 · Cited by 2,113
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- Galvan A., 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 6885
- Harter S., 1985, Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children
- Harter S., 1988, Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents
- Knutson B., 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1
- Treffers D. A., 2002, Manual of the Self-perception Scale for Adolescents
- Utens E. M. W. J., 2000, Dutch translation of the March's Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC-NL)
- Veerman J. W., 1997, Dutch translation of the Self Perception Profile for Children
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3313 · Cited by 2,507
Self-citationThe Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Social Evaluation
Somerville, L. H. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413476512 · Cited by 1,011
The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making
Ruff, C. C., & Fehr, E. (2014) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3776 · Cited by 716
The Trier Social Stress Test: Principles and practice
Allen, A. P., Kennedy, P. J., Dockray, S., Cryan, J. F., Dinan, T. G., & Clarke, G. (2017) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2016.11.001 · Cited by 525
Why Interventions to Influence Adolescent Behavior Often Fail but Could Succeed
Yeager, D. S., Dahl, R. E., & Dweck, C. S. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617722620 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Gunther Moor, B., van Leijenhorst, L., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Crone, E. A., & Van der Molen, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Venue
- Social Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-10-14
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 461-482
- ISSN
- 1747-0919 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-0927
- OpenAlex
- W1964598640
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- social evaluation, social acceptance, social rejection, neural correlates, developmental trajectories, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, social feedback, peer liking, brain aging, children and adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Social Behavior, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
