Cited by 271Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCellular transport and secretionDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 16 of the 46 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

VPS35 haploinsufficiency increases Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology

Open access

Abstract

VPS35, a major component of the retromer complex, is important for endosome-to-Golgi retrieval of membrane proteins. Although implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), how VPS35 regulates AD-associated pathology is unknown. In this paper, we show that hemizygous deletion of Vps35 in the Tg2576 mouse model of AD led to earlier-onset AD-like phenotypes, including cognitive memory deficits, defective long-term potentiation, and impaired postsynaptic glutamatergic neurotransmission in young adult age. These deficits correlated well with an increase of β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) level in the mutant hippocampus. We further demonstrate that VPS35 is predominantly expressed in pyramidal neurons of young adult hippocampus and interacts with BACE1, a protease responsible for Aβ production. Loss of VPS35 function in the mouse hippocampus increased BACE1 activity. Suppression of VPS35 expression in culture decreased BACE1 trans-Golgi localization but enriched it in endosomes. These results demonstrate an essential role for VPS35 in suppression of AD neuropathology and in inhibition of BACE1 activation and Aβ production by promoting BACE1 endosome-to-Golgi retrieval.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

VPS35 haploinsufficiency accelerates Alzheimer’s disease–like neuropathology in Tg2576 mice by impairing endosome-to-Golgi retrieval of BACE1, increasing BACE1 activity and Aβ production. The double mutant mice show earlier cognitive, synaptic, and amyloid phenotypes than Tg2576 mice alone.

Key findings

  • Vps35+/m;Tg2576+/− mice showed earlier spatial learning/memory deficits at 3 and 6 mo, impaired LTP in CA1 and dentate gyrus, and reduced AMPA/NMDA receptor–mediated mEPSC amplitudes and frequencies, with no change in GABAergic transmission.
  • Aβ deposits were more numerous and larger in 6- and 12-mo-old Vps35+/m;Tg2576+/− brains than in Tg2576 brains; human Aβ40 was higher in 2-mo-old double mutant hippocampus and cortex by 30% and 15%, respectively, and mouse Aβ40 was also increased in Vps35+/m and double mutants. Aβ42 increased, but the Aβ40/Aβ42 ratio was unchanged.
  • VPS35 interacted with BACE1, with a BACE1-binding site at VPS35 amino acids 390–606; loss of VPS35 increased BACE1 localization to Rab5/Rab7/LAMP1-positive endosomal compartments and reduced Rab11 recycling endosome localization.
  • BACE1 activity increased by ∼50% in Vps35+/m hippocampus and ∼20% in cortex versus WT, with further increases in double mutants; C99 and sAPPβ were increased in Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m hippocampus.

Methods

  • Vps35 mutant mice were generated by gene trapping; homozygotes died before E10, while heterozygotes expressed Vps35 at ∼50% of WT and were crossed with Tg2576 APPswe mice to produce WT, Tg2576+/−, Vps35+/m, and Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m littermates.
  • Behavioral testing used the Morris water maze at 1–2, 3, and 6 mo; electrophysiology measured fEPSPs, LTP, mEPSCs, eEPSCs, mIPSCs, and eIPSCs in hippocampal slices; biochemistry included Aβ40/42 ELISAs, BACE1 activity assays, Western blots for APP cleavage products, immunohistochemistry, coimmunoprecipitation, and GST pull-down.
  • Data were analyzed with one-way or repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc tests, or t tests, with significance at P < 0.05.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it remains to be investigated whether Golgi/endosome-associated BACE1 activity is altered by loss of Vps35, where Aβ is produced in Vps35-deficient neurons, and whether APP and APPswe trafficking are differentially regulated by VPS35; it also notes that an Aβ-independent mechanism for synapse/synaptic activity loss cannot be excluded.
  • Evident from the text: the study relies on mouse and cultured-cell models, with no human tissue validation; some supporting results are described as “unpublished data” or “not depicted,” and several biochemical/plaque quantifications use small n values (e.g., n = 4 for ELISA and plaque analyses).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.201105109

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1. Impaired spatial learning and memory by the Morris water maze test in young adult Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/− mice. (A–H) 3 (A, C, E, and G)- and 6 (B, D, F, and H)-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice showed increases of swimming latency (A and B) and total distance (C and D) in the training sessions but decreases of the platform probe frequency (E and F) in the probe tests relative to the age-matched Tg2576+/−, Vps35+/m, and nontransgenic (WT) mice. Although Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m showed slightly higher velocity at day 1–3 sessions, repeated measures ANOVA analysis of the total five sessions showed no significant change of the velocity among the four groups in both 3- and 6-mo-old mice (G and H). Comparing the performance between 3- and 6-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice, a trend toward longer latency and distance was noted in the 6-mo-old mice, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05, using repeated measures ANOVA). However, the platform probe frequency was significantly reduced in 6-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice as compared with that in 3-mo-old (P < 0.05). Data shown are mean ± SEM, and n = 6–10 for each of the genotypes in 3-mo-old mice, whereas n = 5–11 for each of the genotypes in 6-mo-old mice. *, P < 0.05, with a significant difference from the Tg2576+/−, Vps35+/m, and WT control mice by repeated measures ANOVA; #, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01, with a significant difference by one-way ANOVA followed by the least significant difference test.
Figure 1. Impaired spatial learning and memory by the Morris water maze test in young adult Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/− mice. (A–H) 3 (A, C, E, and G)- and 6 (B, D, F, and H)-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice showed increases of swimming latency (A and B) and total distance (C and D) in the training sessions but decreases of the platform probe frequency (E and F) in the probe tests relative to the age-matched Tg2576+/−, Vps35+/m, and nontransgenic (WT) mice. Although Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m showed slightly higher velocity at day 1–3 sessions, repeated measures ANOVA analysis of the total five sessions showed no significant change of the velocity among the four groups in both 3- and 6-mo-old mice (G and H). Comparing the performance between 3- and 6-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice, a trend toward longer latency and distance was noted in the 6-mo-old mice, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05, using repeated measures ANOVA). However, the platform probe frequency was significantly reduced in 6-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice as compared with that in 3-mo-old (P < 0.05). Data shown are mean ± SEM, and n = 6–10 for each of the genotypes in 3-mo-old mice, whereas n = 5–11 for each of the genotypes in 6-mo-old mice. *, P < 0.05, with a significant difference from the Tg2576+/−, Vps35+/m, and WT control mice by repeated measures ANOVA; #, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01, with a significant difference by one-way ANOVA followed by the least significant difference test.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Acceleration of LTP deficit in the CA1 region and the DG in Tg2576+/− hippocampus by loss of Vps35 function. (A and B) Input–output relations generated by stimulating the SCs and recording in CA1 stratum radiatum (A) or by stimulating the perforant pathway and recording in stratum moleculare of the DG (B). The basal transmission in both CA1 (A) and DG (B) were similar in aged-matched WT, Tg2576+/−, and Vps35+/m mice but was significantly impaired in Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. Means ± SEM are shown; n = 6–8 for CA1 recordings, and n = 7–9 for DG recordings. *, P < 0.05, using repeated measures ANOVA. (C) LTP at the SC-CA1 synapses was normal in Tg2576+/− and Vps35+/m mice but was defective in the 2-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. LTP was induced by one train of 100-Hz stimuli in the SCs. The upset shows representative traces of fEPSP recordings of responses before and 50 min after high frequency stimulation (HFS; arrow). (D) Quantitative analysis of data in C. The level of fEPSP potentiation was determined at a mean of 0–3 min and 50–60 min after high frequency stimulation. n = 5–7. (E) Severe LTP impairment at the SC-CA1 synapses in the 4-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. (F) Quantitative analysis of data in E. n = 5–7. (G) LTP at the DG was normal in Tg2576+/− and Vps35+/m mice but was defective in the 2–4-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. LTP was induced by a strong theta burst stimuli at the perforant pathway given at the time indicated by the arrow and recorded in the presence of 20 µM bicuculline (see Materials and methods). (H) Quantitative analysis of data in G. n = 8–11. (D, F, and H) *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
Figure 2. Acceleration of LTP deficit in the CA1 region and the DG in Tg2576+/− hippocampus by loss of Vps35 function. (A and B) Input–output relations generated by stimulating the SCs and recording in CA1 stratum radiatum (A) or by stimulating the perforant pathway and recording in stratum moleculare of the DG (B). The basal transmission in both CA1 (A) and DG (B) were similar in aged-matched WT, Tg2576+/−, and Vps35+/m mice but was significantly impaired in Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. Means ± SEM are shown; n = 6–8 for CA1 recordings, and n = 7–9 for DG recordings. *, P < 0.05, using repeated measures ANOVA. (C) LTP at the SC-CA1 synapses was normal in Tg2576+/− and Vps35+/m mice but was defective in the 2-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. LTP was induced by one train of 100-Hz stimuli in the SCs. The upset shows representative traces of fEPSP recordings of responses before and 50 min after high frequency stimulation (HFS; arrow). (D) Quantitative analysis of data in C. The level of fEPSP potentiation was determined at a mean of 0–3 min and 50–60 min after high frequency stimulation. n = 5–7. (E) Severe LTP impairment at the SC-CA1 synapses in the 4-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. (F) Quantitative analysis of data in E. n = 5–7. (G) LTP at the DG was normal in Tg2576+/− and Vps35+/m mice but was defective in the 2–4-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. LTP was induced by a strong theta burst stimuli at the perforant pathway given at the time indicated by the arrow and recorded in the presence of 20 µM bicuculline (see Materials and methods). (H) Quantitative analysis of data in G. n = 8–11. (D, F, and H) *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Deficit in glutamatergic synaptic transmission in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons of young adult Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/− mice. (A and B) Representative traces of AMPA (A) and NMDA (B) receptor-mediated mEPSCs. All mEPSCs were recorded at a holding potential of −65 mV. NMDA receptor-mediated mEPSCs were recorded in Mg2+-free aCSF (see Materials and methods). Bars, 200 ms, 40 pA. (C and D) Cumulative distribution plots (left) and mean amplitude of AMPA receptor-mediated mEPSCs (C, right) and NMDA receptor-mediated mEPSCs (D, right). (E and F) Cumulative frequency plots of the interevent interval (left) and quantitative analysis of the frequency of AMPA receptor-mediated mEPSCs (E, right) and NMDA receptor-mediated mEPSCs (F, right). (G, bottom) Representative traces of eEPSCs (NMDA [right] and AMPA [left]) and quantitative analysis of evoked AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated EPSC amplitude to stimulus intensity. AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs were recorded at a holding potential of −65 mV and +40 mV, respectively. (top) From left to right, the stimulus intensities for each trace were 2, 5, 10, and 30 µA (saturating stimulus). (H) Paired-pulse ratio analysis. Data were obtained from whole-cell recordings of CA1 pyramidal neurons from the four indicated groups of mice at the age of 2 mo old, including WT, Tg2576+/−, Vps35+/m, and Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. (C–H) Data shown as mean ± SEM were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (for averaged mEPSC amplitude and frequency and paired-pulse ratio), Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (for mEPSC cumulative histograms), and repeated measures ANOVA (for eEPSC amplitude). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; n = 9–16.
Figure 3. Deficit in glutamatergic synaptic transmission in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons of young adult Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/− mice. (A and B) Representative traces of AMPA (A) and NMDA (B) receptor-mediated mEPSCs. All mEPSCs were recorded at a holding potential of −65 mV. NMDA receptor-mediated mEPSCs were recorded in Mg2+-free aCSF (see Materials and methods). Bars, 200 ms, 40 pA. (C and D) Cumulative distribution plots (left) and mean amplitude of AMPA receptor-mediated mEPSCs (C, right) and NMDA receptor-mediated mEPSCs (D, right). (E and F) Cumulative frequency plots of the interevent interval (left) and quantitative analysis of the frequency of AMPA receptor-mediated mEPSCs (E, right) and NMDA receptor-mediated mEPSCs (F, right). (G, bottom) Representative traces of eEPSCs (NMDA [right] and AMPA [left]) and quantitative analysis of evoked AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated EPSC amplitude to stimulus intensity. AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs were recorded at a holding potential of −65 mV and +40 mV, respectively. (top) From left to right, the stimulus intensities for each trace were 2, 5, 10, and 30 µA (saturating stimulus). (H) Paired-pulse ratio analysis. Data were obtained from whole-cell recordings of CA1 pyramidal neurons from the four indicated groups of mice at the age of 2 mo old, including WT, Tg2576+/−, Vps35+/m, and Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice. (C–H) Data shown as mean ± SEM were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (for averaged mEPSC amplitude and frequency and paired-pulse ratio), Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (for mEPSC cumulative histograms), and repeated measures ANOVA (for eEPSC amplitude). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; n = 9–16.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Increase of Aβ deposits and Aβ40 in the hippocampus and cortex by loss of VPS35 function. (A and B) Increase of Aβ deposits in 6-mo or older Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m brain as compared with that of Tg2576+/− by immunohistochemical staining analysis using anti-6E10 antibody. Images are shown in A, and quantification data are presented in B (mean ± SEM; n = 4 for each of the genotypes). *, P < 0.01, with a significant difference from the control (Tg2576+/−) by Student’s t test. (C) Increase of human Aβ40 levels in 2-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m hippocampus and cortex as compared with that of Tg2576+/− mice. (D) Increase of mouse Aβ40 levels in 2-mo-old hippocampus and cortex of Vps35+/m mice (compared with WT) and Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice (compared with Tg2576+/−). (C and D) Hippocampus and cortex from WT and indicated mutant mice were homogenized with guanidine HCl extraction buffer, and the homogenates were analyzed by ELISAs for human (C) and mouse (D) Aβ1–40. Data, shown as mean ± SEM, were analyzed by Student’s t test. *, P < 0.01. n = 4 for each of the genotypes.
Figure 4. Increase of Aβ deposits and Aβ40 in the hippocampus and cortex by loss of VPS35 function. (A and B) Increase of Aβ deposits in 6-mo or older Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m brain as compared with that of Tg2576+/− by immunohistochemical staining analysis using anti-6E10 antibody. Images are shown in A, and quantification data are presented in B (mean ± SEM; n = 4 for each of the genotypes). *, P < 0.01, with a significant difference from the control (Tg2576+/−) by Student’s t test. (C) Increase of human Aβ40 levels in 2-mo-old Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m hippocampus and cortex as compared with that of Tg2576+/− mice. (D) Increase of mouse Aβ40 levels in 2-mo-old hippocampus and cortex of Vps35+/m mice (compared with WT) and Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice (compared with Tg2576+/−). (C and D) Hippocampus and cortex from WT and indicated mutant mice were homogenized with guanidine HCl extraction buffer, and the homogenates were analyzed by ELISAs for human (C) and mouse (D) Aβ1–40. Data, shown as mean ± SEM, were analyzed by Student’s t test. *, P < 0.01. n = 4 for each of the genotypes.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 5. VPS35 expression in pyramidal neurons of hippocampus and cortex. (A and B) Detection of enzymatic LacZ activity in 2-mo-old WT (Vps35+/+) and Vps35+/m cortex (A) and hippocampus (B). LacZ activity was only detected in Vps35+/m but not WT and was largely expressed in layer IV–V cortical neurons and CA1–3 hippocampus. Layers I–VI in cortex and DG and CA1–3 in hippocampus are indicated. Bars, 200 µm. (C and D) Immunofluorescence staining analysis of VPS35 protein distribution in pyramidal neurons of cortex and hippocampus from adult mouse brain. Confocal images of coimmunostaining analysis of VPS35 with CaMKII (C) and MAP2, parvalbumin (PV), and GAD67-GFP (D) are shown with their respective enlarged images of the boxed regions (C). Bars, 20 µm.
Figure 5. VPS35 expression in pyramidal neurons of hippocampus and cortex. (A and B) Detection of enzymatic LacZ activity in 2-mo-old WT (Vps35+/+) and Vps35+/m cortex (A) and hippocampus (B). LacZ activity was only detected in Vps35+/m but not WT and was largely expressed in layer IV–V cortical neurons and CA1–3 hippocampus. Layers I–VI in cortex and DG and CA1–3 in hippocampus are indicated. Bars, 200 µm. (C and D) Immunofluorescence staining analysis of VPS35 protein distribution in pyramidal neurons of cortex and hippocampus from adult mouse brain. Confocal images of coimmunostaining analysis of VPS35 with CaMKII (C) and MAP2, parvalbumin (PV), and GAD67-GFP (D) are shown with their respective enlarged images of the boxed regions (C). Bars, 20 µm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 6. VPS35–BACE1 interaction in vitro, in culture, and in mouse brain. (A) Coimmunostaining analysis of exogenous BACE1 with endogenous Vps35 in NLT cells transfected with BACE1-HA. Closed arrows indicate their colocalization, and open arrows indicate BACE1-HA–negative cells. (B) Coimmunostaining analysis of endogenous BACE1 with Vps35 in primary cultured mouse cortical neurons (DIV3). Arrows indicate their colocalization. (A and B) Bars, 20 µm. (C) Coimmunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of VPS35–BACE1 protein complexes in homogenates of mouse brain. IB, immunoblotted; NS, nonspecific. (D) In vitro VPS35–BACE1 interaction revealed by GST pull-down assay. HEK293 cells expressing BACE1-HA were lysed, and resulting lysates were incubated with indicated GST fusion proteins (5 µg) immobilized on beads. Bound proteins were probed with anti-HA and -GST antibodies. (E) Coimmunoprecipitation analysis of VPS35–BACE1 protein complexes in lysates of HEK293 cells expressing the indicated plasmids. HEK293 cell lysates were incubated with anti-HA antibodies to immunoprecipitate BACE1 complexes, which were resolved on SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antibodies against Flag. BACE1 and VPS35 in lysates were revealed by immunoblotting with anti-HA and -Flag antibodies, respectively. (F) Illustration of VPS35 structure, its binding partners, and mutant VPS35 proteins and a summary of the data for VPS35–BACE1 interaction. n/a, not analyzed.
Figure 6. VPS35–BACE1 interaction in vitro, in culture, and in mouse brain. (A) Coimmunostaining analysis of exogenous BACE1 with endogenous Vps35 in NLT cells transfected with BACE1-HA. Closed arrows indicate their colocalization, and open arrows indicate BACE1-HA–negative cells. (B) Coimmunostaining analysis of endogenous BACE1 with Vps35 in primary cultured mouse cortical neurons (DIV3). Arrows indicate their colocalization. (A and B) Bars, 20 µm. (C) Coimmunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of VPS35–BACE1 protein complexes in homogenates of mouse brain. IB, immunoblotted; NS, nonspecific. (D) In vitro VPS35–BACE1 interaction revealed by GST pull-down assay. HEK293 cells expressing BACE1-HA were lysed, and resulting lysates were incubated with indicated GST fusion proteins (5 µg) immobilized on beads. Bound proteins were probed with anti-HA and -GST antibodies. (E) Coimmunoprecipitation analysis of VPS35–BACE1 protein complexes in lysates of HEK293 cells expressing the indicated plasmids. HEK293 cell lysates were incubated with anti-HA antibodies to immunoprecipitate BACE1 complexes, which were resolved on SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antibodies against Flag. BACE1 and VPS35 in lysates were revealed by immunoblotting with anti-HA and -Flag antibodies, respectively. (F) Illustration of VPS35 structure, its binding partners, and mutant VPS35 proteins and a summary of the data for VPS35–BACE1 interaction. n/a, not analyzed.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 7. Increase of BACE1 localization in endosomal compartments in NLT cells suppressing Vps35 expression and in Vps35+/− neurons. (A) Coimmunostaining analysis of exogenous BACE1 with endogenous Vps35, GM130, and LAMP1 in NLT cells transfected with BACE1-HA with control or shRNA-Vps35. MOCK indicates control shRNA. (B) Coimmunostaining analysis of BACE1 with GFP-Rab5/7/11 in NLT cells coexpressing BACE1-HA and GFP-Rab5/7/11 with control or shRNA-Vps35. (A and B) Amplified images were included (indicated in the insets). (C) Quantification analysis of data from A and B using ImageJ. The colocalization index of BACE1 with the indicated markers (LAMP1 and Rab-5/7/11) was determined by the measurement of overlapped signal (yellow fluorescence) over total BACE1 signal. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 5). *, P < 0.01 compared with control shRNA (Ctr shRNA) cells. (D) Coimmunostaining analysis of endogenous BACE1 with Rab7 in primary cortical neurons from WT and Vps35+/m mouse (E18 and DIV3). Amplified images are indicated in the insets. (E) Quantification analysis of data from D using ImageJ. The colocalization index of BACE1 with Rab7 was determined by the measurement of overlapped signal (yellow fluorescence) over total BACE1 signal. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 5). *, P < 0.01 compared with WT neurons. (F) Illustration of the working model for Vps35 in BACE1 endosomal-to-Golgi retrieval. Bars, 20 µm.
Figure 7. Increase of BACE1 localization in endosomal compartments in NLT cells suppressing Vps35 expression and in Vps35+/− neurons. (A) Coimmunostaining analysis of exogenous BACE1 with endogenous Vps35, GM130, and LAMP1 in NLT cells transfected with BACE1-HA with control or shRNA-Vps35. MOCK indicates control shRNA. (B) Coimmunostaining analysis of BACE1 with GFP-Rab5/7/11 in NLT cells coexpressing BACE1-HA and GFP-Rab5/7/11 with control or shRNA-Vps35. (A and B) Amplified images were included (indicated in the insets). (C) Quantification analysis of data from A and B using ImageJ. The colocalization index of BACE1 with the indicated markers (LAMP1 and Rab-5/7/11) was determined by the measurement of overlapped signal (yellow fluorescence) over total BACE1 signal. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 5). *, P < 0.01 compared with control shRNA (Ctr shRNA) cells. (D) Coimmunostaining analysis of endogenous BACE1 with Rab7 in primary cortical neurons from WT and Vps35+/m mouse (E18 and DIV3). Amplified images are indicated in the insets. (E) Quantification analysis of data from D using ImageJ. The colocalization index of BACE1 with Rab7 was determined by the measurement of overlapped signal (yellow fluorescence) over total BACE1 signal. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 5). *, P < 0.01 compared with WT neurons. (F) Illustration of the working model for Vps35 in BACE1 endosomal-to-Golgi retrieval. Bars, 20 µm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 8. Increase of BACE1-mediated cleavage of APP and BACE1 activity in young adult Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m hippocampus. (A) Illustration of APP structure and its cleavage sites. The epitopes for the antibodies (sAPPβ, 6E10, and 6687) and the cleavage fragments (sAPPβ, βCTF/C99, and αCTF/C83) are indicated. (B and C) Western blot analysis of C99 and sAPPβ BACE1-mediated APP cleavage products using the indicated antibodies. Homogenates of cortex and hippocampus from 2-mo-old WT, Vps35+/m, Tg2576+/−, and Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice were subjected to Western blot analysis (16% Tricine SDS-PAGE; see Materials and methods). The full length (FL) of APP, the C99, sAPPβ, and C88 is indicated by arrows. APP6687, but not 6E10, antibody also detected C83 (indicated by the open arrow), an α-secretase–mediated APP cleavage product. Equal amounts of homogenates (50 µg of protein) were loaded and revealed by immunoblot (IB) using anti–β-actin antibody. (D–F) Quantification analysis of C99 (D), C83 (E), and sAPPβ (F) cleavage products, in which three different experiments were quantified, and data were shown as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, compared with Tg2576+/−. (G) In vitro BACE1 activity measured by a BACE1 assay kit purchased from Abcam. The hippocampal and cortical homogenates from 2-mo-old WT and the indicated mutant mice were prepared for the in vitro BACE1 activity assay (see Materials and methods). The data were quantified from three to four different experiments and shown as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.01 compared with WT control; **, P < 0.01 compared with Tg2576+/−.
Figure 8. Increase of BACE1-mediated cleavage of APP and BACE1 activity in young adult Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m hippocampus. (A) Illustration of APP structure and its cleavage sites. The epitopes for the antibodies (sAPPβ, 6E10, and 6687) and the cleavage fragments (sAPPβ, βCTF/C99, and αCTF/C83) are indicated. (B and C) Western blot analysis of C99 and sAPPβ BACE1-mediated APP cleavage products using the indicated antibodies. Homogenates of cortex and hippocampus from 2-mo-old WT, Vps35+/m, Tg2576+/−, and Tg2576+/−;Vps35+/m mice were subjected to Western blot analysis (16% Tricine SDS-PAGE; see Materials and methods). The full length (FL) of APP, the C99, sAPPβ, and C88 is indicated by arrows. APP6687, but not 6E10, antibody also detected C83 (indicated by the open arrow), an α-secretase–mediated APP cleavage product. Equal amounts of homogenates (50 µg of protein) were loaded and revealed by immunoblot (IB) using anti–β-actin antibody. (D–F) Quantification analysis of C99 (D), C83 (E), and sAPPβ (F) cleavage products, in which three different experiments were quantified, and data were shown as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, compared with Tg2576+/−. (G) In vitro BACE1 activity measured by a BACE1 assay kit purchased from Abcam. The hippocampal and cortical homogenates from 2-mo-old WT and the indicated mutant mice were prepared for the in vitro BACE1 activity assay (see Materials and methods). The data were quantified from three to four different experiments and shown as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.01 compared with WT control; **, P < 0.01 compared with Tg2576+/−.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

66 Own result · 27 Own interpretation · 9 No full text of the sources · 6 Own method · 5 Partly supported · 5 Not checked yet · 4 Supported · 3 Supported so far · 3 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 3 references — free account

Show all 70 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 40
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
58 of 58
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The mechanisms by which the retromer is involved in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis remain elusive.

    “However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Aβ40/42 production requires BACE1.

    “Aβ40/42 production requires BACE1.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Retromer is implicated in the pathogenesis of late-onset AD.

    “Although retromer is implicated in the pathogenesis of late-onset AD, the function of VPS35 in AD pathology and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unclear.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The function of VPS35 in AD pathology and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unclear.

    “Although retromer is implicated in the pathogenesis of late-onset AD, the function of VPS35 in AD pathology and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unclear.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    BACE1 cleavage of APP is favored in endosomal compartments.

    “increased BACE1 localization to the endosomal compartments where the BACE1 cleavage of APP is favored”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–271 of 271

Metadata

Authors
Wen, L., Tang, F.-L., Hong, Y., Luo, S.-W., Wang, C.-L., He, W., Shen, C., Jung, J.-U., Xiong, F., Lee, D.-H., Zhang, Q.-G., Brann, D., Kim, T.-W., Yan, R., Mei, L., & Xiong, W.-C.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics 1 and 2
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wen, Lei
  • He, Wanxia
  • Xiong, Fei
  • Xiong, Wen-Cheng
Venue
Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2011-11-21
Volume
195
Issue
5
Pages
765-779
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2150669288
Cited by
270
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (RF1AG045781)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS060648)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
VPS35, retromer complex, Alzheimer's disease, haploinsufficiency, BACE1, amyloid-beta production, Tg2576 mice, hippocampus, long-term potentiation, glutamatergic neurotransmission, pyramidal neurons
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Hippocampus, Humans, Endosomes, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases, trans-Golgi Network, Vesicular Transport Proteins, Mice, Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases, HEK293 Cells, Haploinsufficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review