Cited by 46Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

In vivo characterization of regenerative peripheral nerve interface function

Open access
Ursu, Daniel C, Urbanchek, Melanie G, Nedic, Andrej, Cederna, Paul S, Gillespie, R Brent·2016·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Objective. Regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) are neurotized free autologous muscle grafts equipped with electrodes to record myoelectric signals for prosthesis control. Viability of rat RPNI constructs have been demonstrated using evoked responses. In vivo RPNI characterization is the next critical step for assessment as a control modality for prosthetic devices. Approach. Two RPNIs were created in each of two rats by grafting portions of free muscle to the ends of divided peripheral nerves (peroneal in the left and tibial in the right hind limb) and placing bipolar electrodes on the graft surface. After four months, we examined in vivo electromyographic signal activity and compared these signals to muscular electromyographic signals recorded from autologous muscles in two rats serving as controls. An additional group of two rats in which the autologous muscles were denervated served to quantify cross-talk in the electrode recordings. Recordings were made while rats walked on a treadmill and a motion capture system tracked the hind limbs. Amplitude and periodicity of signals relative to gait were quantified, correlation between electromyographic and motion recording were assessed, and a decoder was trained to predict joint motion. Main Results. Raw RPNI signals were active during walking, with amplitudes of 1 mV PP , and quiet during standing, with amplitudes less than 0.1 mV PP . RPNI signals were periodic and entrained with gait. A decoder predicted bilateral ankle motion with greater than 80% reliability. Control group signal activity agreed with literature. Denervated group signals remained quiescent throughout all evaluations. Significance. In vivo myoelectric RPNI activity encodes neural activation patterns associated with gait. Signal contamination from muscles adjacent to the RPNI is minimal, as demonstrated by the low amplitude signals obtained from the Denervated group. The periodicity and entrainment to gait of RPNI recordings suggests the transduced signals were generated via central nervous system control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026012

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous animal work showed that RPNIs need about three months to mature and stabilize.

    “results from previous animal work, which demonstrated that it took approximately 3 months for RPNIs to mature and stabilize (12, 15–17).”

    From A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees (2020) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Methods (§2.1; page unavailable) say the rats recuperated for four months to allow healing and graft reinnervation, with evaluation during the fourth month. The paper reports that RPNI signal amplitudes did not vary appreciably over the evaluation period (Figure 4 caption; page unavailable), but it does not demonstrate that maturation and stabilization took approximately three months. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This process creates a stable peripheral nerve bioamplifier that produces high-amplitude EMG signals that could be used to control a prosthetic device.

    “This process creates a stable, peripheral nerve bioamplifier that produces high-amplitude EMG signals, which could be used to control a prosthetic device (14–17).”
  • Useful results have been obtained using the RPNI technique in experimental models.

    “A number of useful results have been obtained using the RPNI technique in experimental models (Ceballos et al., 2002; Ursu et al., 2016).”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Ursu et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ursu, D. C., Urbanchek, M. G., Nedic, A., Cederna, P. S., & Gillespie, R. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Gillespie, R Brent
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2016-02-09
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
026012
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2499561050
Cited by
46
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-11-C-4190)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
regenerative peripheral nerve interface, myoelectric signals, prosthetic control, peripheral nerve regeneration, free muscle graft, electromyography, denervation, treadmill walking, rat model
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrodes, Implanted, Electromyography, Gait, Hindlimb, Male, Nerve Regeneration, Peripheral Nerves, Rats, Inbred F344, Walking, Muscle, Skeletal, Transplants, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review