Cited by 81Diabetes Management and ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringOcular Surface and Contact Lens

Initial Clinical Testing of a Holographic Non-Invasive Contact Lens Glucose Sensor

Domschke, Angelika, March, Wayne F., Kabilan, Satyamoorthy, Lowe, Christopher·2006·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of a new holographic contact lens glucose sensor for the non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose. METHODS: One fasting normal subject was given an oral challenge consisting of 44 g of glucose. The contact lens hologram signal and fingerstick blood glucose were measured over a 26- min period. RESULTS: The contact lens hologram signal appeared to track blood glucose well. The contact lens was comfortable and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The holographic contact lens glucose sensor shows promise as a non-invasive home glucose monitor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2006.8.89

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automated insulin pumps lower the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, an indicator for glycemic control.

    “automated insulin pumps lowers the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, which is an indicator for glycemic control.82”

    From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [82]

  • Real-time monitoring of glucose in conjunction with automated insulin pumps lowers the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, which is an indicator for glycemic control.

    “Real‐time monitoring of glucose in conjunction with automated insulin pumps lowers the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, which is an indicator for glycemic control.82”

    From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [82]

  • The possibility of quantifying glucose in human tear fluid at physiological conditions using holographic contact lenses was presented around the same time based on advantages such as no need of battery, easy reading, and continuous glucose signal monitoring.

    “The possibility of quantifying glucose in human tear fluid at physiological conditions using holographic contact lenses was also presented around the same time based on its advantages such as a no need of battery, easy reading, and continuous glucose signal monitoring109.”

    From Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring (2019) · cites this paper as [109]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domschke, A., March, W. F., Kabilan, S., & Lowe, C.
Affiliations
  • CIBA Vision Corporation, Duluth, Georgia.
  • State University of New York (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2006-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
89-93
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2075297164
Cited by
81
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Keywords
glucose sensor, non-invasive glucose monitoring, oral glucose tolerance test
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Contact Lenses, Environmental Monitoring, Equipment Design, Glucose, Holography, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review